Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush declares democrats can be left behind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:09 PM
Original message
Bush declares democrats can be left behind
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 05:10 PM by AIndependentTexan
In his speech yesterday, he said something to the extent of "if the Democrats want to participate in our agenda, that is fine. If not, they will simply be left behind".


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. WAKE UP PEOPLE HE JUST DECLARED HIMSELF DICTATOR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steelangel Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh my god
how can more than 50% of americans didn't see that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Lance Bass Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its his "style"
What a uniter huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lenape85 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. NO MORE DINOS
If any Democrat participates in the Bush agenda, I'm going to primary them out or vote Green
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. gee, that's as subtle as a brick to the head
Left behind, like those books where non-christians stick around and have the anti-christ poke them with pointed sticks or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's the danger of two-party duopolies
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 05:29 PM by Selatius
You are more likely to see one party or the other dominate the branches of government, and, for a time, you see a government that acts more like a one-party state than a pluralistic democracy. Multiparty representative democracies in other countries are healthier when it comes to political culture. There are many views and voices, not just two, and it forces people to compromise more rather than leave folks behind because no one party could hope to gain majority power without the other parties in government.

I'm not advocating a parliamentary style system, but what I do advocate is the abolition of the Electoral College and the institution of IRV (instant runoff voting) for all federal seats including the White House. That way, if no one gets the majority in the first round of elections, IRV will ensure that a candidate which is acceptable to a MAJORITY or the electorate, not a simple PLURALITY, wins. It makes it easier to unseat corrupt, incompetent parties as well as make it easier for 3rd parties to enter government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Labour's super-majority in britain sorta undermines your point
The party can do whatever it likes, and blair can murder whomever
he wants, and nobody can effect a thing, as their majority is even
larger than bush's.

I agree that a plural system is wiser and healthier, however we've
got a more insideous problem. The mass media have failed totally
their public obligation to use the public airwaves as a checkpoint
on government. Rather, the media are complicity entertainment and
propaganda mouthpieces with serious journalists being deliberately
forced out, and even killed deliberately by the military in iraq.

When the government is behing assassination of journalists, its time
to wonder whether the rot has gone past a 2 party problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Come on! Did he really say that?!
Now I'm really getting scared.

(It's not that I don't believe you. That's the REALLY scary thing!)

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi826 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's why we HAVE to start fighting
Not literally.
But we have GOT to come out of the box fighting.
We may have to fight all the same fights again.
Civil Rights.
The right to vote.
Abortion rights. etc.
Our will must be strong. That means ruthlessly getting rid of any "pansy" Dems at primary time. We need Dems that are not scared to fight.
Thank God Cynthia Mckinney is heading back to Congress.

That Idiot thinks he has to world by the strings right now.

But what would limit him greatly is 2 or 3 Moderate Repubs pulling a Jim Jeffords and he's reined in. Lincoln Chaffee already said he'd switch. We'd just need 3 more and Bush is stopped in his tracks. A SMART majority leader would already be on the phone working on this.
Des
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. READ THIS, THIS IS HOW THEY ARE DECLARING IT AS WELL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. filibuster, gridlock, obstruction, and nonstop FUD
Wrong, chimpy. We are now the ball-and-chain locked around your ankle. You will carry us everywhere you go, which will slow you down considerably. You will never leave us behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. EEW EEW EEW!!! Code language to the fundies!!!
Translation: When the rapture comes, you sinful, evil liberals'll be "left behind."

Why do I get the feeling that if Christ were around today, he'd get all moneychangers-in-the-temple on Bush's ass? This man is unbelievably craven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Lol...you must have just beated me to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You know, it would almost be funny if....
...it weren't so fucking terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. LEFT BEHIND is code talk for Armageddon...no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Yes. It is..
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. Rapture


Now I wonder, was "No Child Left Behind" code for instituting prayer in school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, I declare he can KISS my behind
Fucking fundy chickenhawk assclown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Left behind?
Georgie boy, if the blue states ever secede, the US is crippled. You have no leverage! We stop buying, we stop selling, and you are crushed. You need US! We don't need YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evilqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not possible. Yanno Why?
Because Bush is so far behind the times that he'll have to sprint to catch up to us.

hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. LOL! What a POS. I plan to ignore him as much as I can for ..
the next four years. No telling what damage he has already done to my health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC