Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Broward machines count backward? Palm Beach Post article-READS Fraud!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:11 PM
Original message
Broward machines count backward? Palm Beach Post article-READS Fraud!


By Eliot Kleinberg

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Friday, November 05, 2004

FORT LAUDERDALE -- It had to happen. Things were just going too smoothly.

Early Thursday, as Broward County elections officials wrapped up after a long day of canvassing votes, something unusual caught their eye. Tallies should go up as more votes are counted. That's simple math. But in some races, the numbers had gone . . . down.

Officials found the software used in Broward can handle only 32,000 votes per precinct. After that, the system starts counting backward.

Why a voting system would be designed to count backward was a mystery to Broward County Mayor Ilene Lieberman. She was on the phone late Wednesday with Omaha-based Elections Systems and Software.

more...
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/news/epap ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LilKim Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. 32,000? Excuse me for talking geek (and pasting my reply from another
thread) but I'm guessing they meant 32,767. It sounds like the programmer was using only a two byte signed integer for storing vote totals which is pretty bone headed. Storing a number larger than 32,767 in such variables can cause them to flip negative.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Or was it evil geius covering itself as stupidity
I am a programmer too and that is just a little too convientently incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LilKim Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I dunno, I've worked with a number of Visual Basic programmers and
I've seen a lot of marginally competent and some downright incompetent coders. Anyone who's primary programming background is in high level applications work is essentially clueless when it comes to the subtleties and limitations of signed integers. Right now I'm working with some real estate data and in this day and age I find it positively mind boggling that whoever wrote the data entry interface didn't have enough sense to have a function to copy the property address to the owner address (since they're nearly always the same) and instead forces the user to retype it in, furthering any chance of typos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You are right.
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 11:06 PM by bemildred
Two byte signed int is the first thing to check, and most
applications programmers will not have much of a clue about
such issues. Incompetence is the norm.

IIRC they run these on XP using Excel, so it's a clueless
development environment.

One should look for numbers to go up to 32767 and then to -32768 and
count up towards -1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes2000 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Link Isn't Working....
Can you try again?

I need to read the whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Try this one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. keep this kicked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just tried looking for it and
Edited on Fri Nov-05-04 07:56 PM by Frenchie4Clark
Thanks ....Contrary 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Also here is some important information
Here is how they cheated by E-machines votes PAY ATTENION

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1318200&mesg_id=1318200&page=

Stock symbol of Diebold - DBD and history

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=1319721#1319974

saw this on another forum

Diebold used the old underhanded ATM trick.....Negative vote count aka negative numbers when doing a withdrawl.....So easy to do, it actually reverses the percentages immediately, making it seem like no fraud could happen!


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1314823&mesg_id=1314823&page=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. It is heartbreaking.
Either incompetence or illegality could very well be depriving this country of its elected leader.

But who can we turn to in order to have all these things investigated in a proper way?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC