Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where are the wistle blowers if there was voter fraud?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:12 PM
Original message
Where are the wistle blowers if there was voter fraud?
I do think there was tampering with the BBV, but I'm concerned that no one who worked the polls, or works in county and state election departments has come forward. There's surely democrats who work in those positions who could blow this wide open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's one........................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:34 PM
Original message
I'm sorry, can you give a name of the whistle blower?
I couldn't find anything about a whistle blower at the provided link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's not one person, There is a FL. politician doing something but this is
just an overall group thing. I'll go look for the one name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I had read the alleged FL politician story
but he would not be a whistle blower, and I have seen nothing more than a second hand account that remains unsubstantiated.

A whistle blower, by definition, would be somebody within either the company building, programming, and providing the machines who comes out telling the story of how they designed it for fraud or in a County Clerk or Secretary of State office who witnessed and/or participated in election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So you only want someone from the company as proof. Sorry can't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. OR a County Clerk's office or a Secretary of State's office
There must be litereally hundreds of people involved all over the country for this to have happened.

Surely one witness can be produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Did you read anything I gave you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I've read it all
and have seen no substantiation of the charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. If Wally O'Dell confessed on national TV, Walt would still say...
"no substantiation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Now there's a leap
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 02:24 PM by Walt Starr
:eyes:

You must be absolutely correct. I'd better get my tinfoilhat adjusted because obviously Karl Rove's mind rays are affecting me.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. DU dupe
Edited on Sun Nov-07-04 01:40 PM by Walt Starr
delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Two points:
1.) The main nightmare of the loosely audited use of computers in elections it that it only takes a disgustingly few people to perpetrate the theft.

2.) Insiders do come forward - but so far they haven't been high enough to prove things to the media's "standards". However, their standards would have acquitted Jack Ruby on a lack of evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here is another story. I'm still looking.........................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good thread.If there really was voter fraud, there's no way it could ever
be kept secret for long, not with so many people speculating about it and supposedly investigating into it. Someone involved would have to fuck up sooner or later.

For the time being, let's just hope that there WAS fraud and that it'll be found out. Frankly, though, I'm getting a little tired of seeing this used as the main excuse why we lost. It's counterproductive to fixing what ails us......in the event that there was no fraud, that is.

Fraud or no fraud, we screwed up enough times during the campaign that we don't need to blame it entirely on this excuse alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry2win Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. sorry if dupe
jeff fisher dem candidate fla. 16th district was to meet with FBI on sat. www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm but like mentioned above not direct connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheshire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-07-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Read that article last night. Good read. If Jeff really does have evidence
of who hacked the election and how they did it, I wonder if we'll ever see his face again. I hope he's got some good people with him when he meets with the FBI if what he says is true.

Funny how you don't hear mention of this on any of the shows on TV. At least I didn't. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC