jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:14 PM
Original message |
Poll question: How will the Senate Dems handle Condom-Loser Rice's SoS nomination? |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. On what grounds should this be opposed? |
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. Well, let's see...here are a few good reasons... |
|
1. Her absolute derth of personal integrity and credibility. 2. Her abject incompetency as a civil servant and administrator. 3. For the sheer politics of lobbing a salvo against the Chimp-in-Chief and everything he stands for.
...
|
kcwayne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. How about incompetence, lack of judgment, and a complete |
|
lack of confidence in her due to her repeated lying to the Congress and people of the United States.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. How would that make her an inappropriate successor to Powell? |
kcwayne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Powell set the bar very low, but does that mean the bar has to stay there? |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. This administration is not going to nominate a good person |
|
If they want their administration to look bad by nominating a bunch of shitheads I say we let them. Besides we'll look bad if we take this to the barricades. Save the poweder for judicial nominees. The court is much more important than shrubbies advisors.
|
kcwayne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
Parche
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
NewHampshireDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"The Democrats are revealing their racism by opposing Rice ... blah blah blah ... high-tech lynching of an uppity black woman ... blah blah blah ... dividing the nation ... blah blah blah ..."
|
whathappened
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
she is nothing more then a yes women to this bunch of lier's , and the dem's better show some spine and send her ass packing
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Unless A Cabinet Nominee Is Hideous They Usually Get Appropved... |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-15-04 07:21 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Can you cite one instance where a presiden't Cabinet appointee was shot down.....
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. No. I cannot cite one. In fact, i don't think it's ever happened. |
|
But some are only confirmed after a nasty political fight. Remember Ashcroft and how his credibility was justifiably tarnished from the get-go.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Ashcroft Passed 58-42 |
|
and there were four or five more Dems then.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Condi pass by a huge margin...
That being said I think she's an awful choice....
She's part of team that alienated a good part of the world....
|
JohnKleeb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Eisenhower's first pick for secretary of commerce |
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. If they expect a problem, the name gets withdrawn |
|
Lani Guerniere (sp?), Kimba Woods, Linda Chavez ...
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Kimba Woods And Linda Chavez Had Ethical Problems... |
|
The withdrawl of Lani Guenierre's nomination was a travesty ....
|
Spinzonner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Not academically qualified |
|
Needs to go back and take Remedial PDB Reading 101
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
but she has a solid academic background...
I also believe she was the provost at Stanford...
|
Carrion
(206 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-15-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
In the current administration, SoS is purely a ceremonial position anyway--they never negotiate with anyone. So, she is perfectly qualified.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |