Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your explanation for the mass exodus of Bush's cabinet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeddyKGB Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:14 PM
Original message
Your explanation for the mass exodus of Bush's cabinet?
Mine:

This is what happens at college sports programs that are about to be sanctioned by the NCAA -- the staffs are cleared to shelter the university and the staff from ties to the scandal.

It's coming, folks - and in a BIG way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rats Leaving A Sinking Ship. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I don't think so....
At least not yet. Rather, I think most of those cabinet members are moving aside (not necessarily willingly, mind you) so that the neocons can consolidate their grip on the executive branch. Look for more appointments of the ultra-faithful like Rice at State. This amounts to a bloodless coup of sorts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton sacked seven Secretaries when he was re-elected.
I wouldn't read too much into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeddyKGB Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Powell wasn't expected to leave for another six months or so.
His early exit IS a surprise -- and, quite frankly, leaves a mess at the State Department.

What do you "read into" that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midem Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. but
he was telling everyone he would leave after one term. It should be no surprise. It will hurt the country though to not have his moderating service in this hostile administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reality Not Tin Foil Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Easy...
Bush, wanting to get his new "Team" going as quickly as possible, was told by Powell that he was going to leave in a few months. Bush, again, wanting to get them all started at the same time asked Powell to leave now, if he was going to leave eventually anyway.

Sorry...No big conspiracy here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midem Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I agree,
this is just a standard shakeup. Also, would you want to work for Bush for more than four years when there are big corporations just begging to pay you half a million per year for your name on the letter head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. The spells that Bar put on them wore off?
:shrug:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Naw, I think the real undead are coming out of their bunkers ...
The invisible gov't that has run the shit since 01 is now free and clear to wander the countryside and do as it pleases, since there's nobody to stop Herr Bush.

The former cabinet was just a front of 'moderate leadership' for public consumption.


:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I'll go with that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Estel Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I agree...
BabyBush doesn't have to appease anyone but himself now and he's putting those closest to him in key spots, so all his dirty dealings will stay secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Loyalty &Control. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Possibly
Big Money on the outside for these guys. However, with bush not having to run for office again he can surround himself with those more attuned to his hate and ignorance. Powell, a voice of reason, if not a weak one, was forced out by the neanderthals who have no use for thoughtfulness or honor or integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. something's up
let's just pray it is not plans to cremate the planet
hopefully morality leads them away, that they are not being chased.
the "all is well on the western front" is a really bad B movie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cabinet changes between terms are customary
It's not unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeddyKGB Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. see post #13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Burnout
tire of lying...tireed of stupid ill conceived policy that they are obliged to defend.

They want to make some money. Book deals. Board of Directors..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reality Not Tin Foil Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. LOL! There's your basic answer!!
They're all tired of the STUPIDITY!!

Who WOUDLN'T be??

LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Four years of on-the-job training for BIG$$ board of directors' positions
Edited on Tue Nov-16-04 02:00 PM by SoCalDem
These people shuttle in and out of government.. They will be raking in the dough. Speaking toours..tell-nothing books..board of directorships for more money than they made in the WH..Paid "analysts" for Fox... radio shows..magazine columns..

It's just a sabbatical.. They will be back in another repube administration..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Before the election....
The media was suggesting that a few may leave if Bush had another term, and the Bush camp kept preaching that everyone was staying and nobody was going to leave if there was another term. Now, it is a question of who will stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. They are ready to cash in their equity
Look, it happens in all administrations that get a second term. The first termers are tired of working 18 hour days and getting a pittance compared to what they could get in the corporate world. So, they take their resumes to corporate America hungry to have a Bushie on staff, and they get paid millions in their new positions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Typical ideological purge
The people being forced out are the ones who stayed the entire 4 years hoping Chimpo would listen to reason. We all know that he's completely disconnected from reality, and now his echo chamber will be airtight. No one will be left to issue a discordant note in the fascist opera.

Everyone will be rubberstamped by a tame congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. Josh Marshall says: Consolidating control
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2004_11_14.php#003995

So is Bush moving to the right or the center in term two?

Wrong metric. He's moving to exert greater control.

Look at the pattern.

Neither Ms. Rice nor Mr. Gonzales are the neo-cons' or the conservatives' choice for their respective offices-to-be.

In each case they're acceptable; but no more.

What distinguishes each is their connection to the president, their loyalty and their fealty. Neither has any base in the city or standing anywhere else absent their connection to him. And in appointing them he has placed the State Department and the Justice Department under his direct and unmediated control as surely as the various members of the White House staff already are.

Which is certainly a good thing since if there is one thing this president sorely needs it is more yes-men.


What I'd like to know is, how does this compare with Nixon's "imperial presidency"? I was too young to be really paying attention during Nixon's term... as a teenager, I was more concerned with boys, rock bands, teen angst, surviving the school "cliques" and such. Plus, I grew up in a small farming community where the world was not too much with us. In general, we were only vaguely aware of events beyond our small stage.

Was this level of control of the apparatus of state power present in Nixon's time? I mean, Bush has his loyalists in control of virtually every arm of state power - AG in charge of federal prosecutions, not to mention the CIA and FBI, Rummy at Defense, Rice at State - every institution that could be used for suppression and "police state tactics" is now being run by people loyal to bu**sh** personally rather than to the institution or the Constitution, or the country as a whole.

I find it very scary, and I'd be somewhat reassured to find out that it's been done - and survived - before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's a political purge.
Similar to what's happening at the CIA. The FBI, Justice Dept, State Dept & Def Dept will follow.

Bushco is taking administrative advice from Joseph Stalin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reality Not Tin Foil Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. The non-tin foil (And therefore probably correct) answer??
They've lost, what, one cabinet member in 4 years? And I've read that commonly, cabinent members last an average of 2 years due to the wear and tear,the 25 hour per day, 8 day per week requirements of the job.

They're leaving because they've done their duty for their country, as THEY see it (As warped as that thought might be).

They're giving themsselves a break, just like members of past administrations have done.

Personally, I'm surprised they haven't lost more over the past 4 years. The fact that they haven't is just now catching up with them and all are leaving at the same time rather than different times.


Of course that's just my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Normal attrition
Anyone that would work for this clown is suspect so having them leave is not a big deal IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Might be normal, might be something more
the real test will be when we see how many have left in a few month's time.

If you see even more resignations between now and say, January, it might just be more than normal attrition.

Also, in past re-elections of an incumbent, did the resignations happen this quickly?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC