Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraqis sure are PATIENT.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:34 AM
Original message
Iraqis sure are PATIENT.
If America were invaded and occupied by a foreign nation on a pile of steaming bullshit pack of lies, 2 million US citizens killed, our doors kicked in and our possessions stolen, our women & kids bound & humiliated, our innocent civilians detained in jails where they were raped, tortured, threatened, killed, our wounded freedom fighters executed while lying unarmed & dying in our churches...would we show the amount of patience Iraqis are showing before we rose up enmass to fight the invaders? I don't think so.

But then, the Iraqis have a very long history of being brutally invaded & occupied for their oil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
florian Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. the world just got too sickly absurd to parody
Check out this NEWS:

Iraqi PM charges militants with plan to "destroy Fallujah"

Apparently unaware that Fallujah had just been reduced to rubble already by the American military, US-appointed Prime Minister of Iraqi Iyad Allawi announced today that captured Iraqi militants “were planning to destroy Fallujah…by blowing up important positions.”

http://warcheerleaders.tripod.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Awesome first post. WELCOME TO DU!!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. But we only did that so we could re-build it.
The hearts and mind of these people must be with us. Are we not happy to have to re-build the WTC?I do some times wonder what is in the mind of these people who like to blow up things. They all think a 180 off from me. I just never get the point of either side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yep..
so we can pay Halliburton and Bechtel ten times the fair rate to reconstruct the destroyed buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Nice work if you can get it--sort of like--
--the veternarian/taxidermist, where one way or another, you always get your dog back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Hi florian!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeaconBlues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish there was some way to put the people of America in the shoes
of the Iraqis for just 24 hours. Since most Americans seem to lack the ability to feel empathy, this is the only way for them to actually understand how much we fucked the Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. you are correct, Deacon
I am absolutley appalled by the lack of empathy I see for the Iraqi civilians AND our soldiers. One freeptard at work actually told me well, 1000 dead soldiers isn't that many compared to Viet Nam. WTF???? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Let your freeper at work know that IN FACT the US death rate is WORSE
than Vietnam. MORE US ARE DEAD in Iraq than the number who died in the FIRST FIVE YEARS of Vietnam.

Vietnam went for 10 years; Iraq is on month #22.

Gawd I LOATHE ignorant stupid idiotic rightwingnuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeaconBlues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The rationalization I was hit with was that, compared with the number of
deaths from traffic accidents the deaths in Iraq don't add up to nothing and are no big deal. Of course, this came from a jackass who never spent a day in the service. Support the troops, indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. The 2700 deaths on 911 add up to nothing, and are no big deal.
Funny how the freeping rightwingnuts are SOOOO STUPID, SOOOO IRRATIONAL, SOOOO ILLOGICAL, they don't realize that for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Classic chicken shit response courtesy of Hannity
yep they hate the troops, We know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Compared to Vietnam...
I'd say we're right on pace. Tell your co-worker not to worry, he'll get his Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm planning to read Orwell's 1984 again.
I reckon that G.O. is the only guy who can help me understand this shit.

All together, now, "DOUBLE-THINK, DOUBLE-THINK !!!! ...."

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting twist.
Despite the fact that I consider Bush a usurper I would certainly be in the streets fighting if a foreign power invaded and killed my brother and daughter to "liberate" me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Vietnamese were rather patient, as well.
I believe they wrote the book on resisting the Colonizers, and a good few Iraqis have read it by now.

:freak:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUDUing2 Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. and when they do become freedom fighters they are called terrorist and
Edited on Wed Nov-17-04 08:53 AM by RUDUing2
shot to death by american soldiers while lying injured on the floor of a mosque...

BTW I can not do new topic post yet so wanted to add this here...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middl...018325.stm

French President Jacques Chirac says he is "not at all sure" the world has become safer with the removal from power of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.
In a BBC interview Mr Chirac suggests the situation in Iraq has helped to prompt an increase in terrorism.

The interview, to be aired on BBC Two's Newsnight programme on Wednesday, comes ahead of his visit to the UK this week.

President Chirac also maintains that any intervention in Iraq should have been through the United Nations.

"To a certain extent Saddam Hussein's departure was a positive thing, " Mr Chirac says when asked if the world is safer now, as US President George W Bush has repeatedly stated.

"But it also provoked reactions, such as the mobilisation in a number of countries, of men and women of Islam, which has made the world more dangerous," Mr Chirac says.

"There's no doubt that there has been an increase in terrorism and one of the origins of that has been the situation in Iraq.

"I'm not at all sure that one can say that the world is safer," Mr Chirac says.

Return favours

He also signals that be believes Britain's support for the US-led war has brought few dividends.

In an earlier interview with British journalists, Mr Chirac said Prime Minister Tony Blair had received nothing in return for backing the Bush administration.

"I'm not sure it is in the nature of our American friends at the moment to return favours systematically," he said.

"I am not sure, with America as it is these days, that it would be easy for someone, even the British, to be an honest broker."

Mr Chirac said he had urged Mr Blair last year to press President Bush to restart the Middle East peace process in return for British support for the US-led war in Iraq.

Speaking in Washington on Monday, Mr Blair called for Europe and the US to bury their differences over Iraq.

"It is not a sensible or intelligent response for us in Europe to ridicule American arguments and parody their political leadership," he said.

The signs are that Mr Chirac and Mr Blair will again at best agree to disagree on the Iraq war when they meet on Thursday, says BBC World Affairs correspondent Mike Wooldridge.

You can see the interview with President Chirac on Newsnight on BBC Two at 2230 GMT on Wednesday 17 November, or watch it on the Newsnight website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. It's their country, they can afford to be patient
Because sooner or later, every bully's attention wanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC