Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

social liberal fiscal conservative

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:09 AM
Original message
social liberal fiscal conservative
What I always thought I was. Is there such a thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Russ Feingold
Jim Doyle (our Gov)
my dad
my husband
me...

You're in good company! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me too...
I imagine that encompasses 3/4 of people in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. At least 3/4 of the people who supported Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Doesn't surprise me that
We are both Clark supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. yeah,
and Wes Clark, too! :hi:

(forgot to add him to my list)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fiscal conservative to what extent?
Conservative as in not spending vast sums of money that we don't have? Socially liberal usually entails higher government spending for more programs, are you for that? Im guess I'm not sure to what degree you are one or the other. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. me personally,
i am all about putting money where our mouth is when it comes to education, health care, various social programs...

we could increase spending this way dramatically by cutting useless defense spending and eliminating pork, getting corporations to actually pay taxes, among other ways without having to increase the individual's taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. My oversimplified view would be to
balance the budget, while maintaining the safety net and assist the underpriviledged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. no longer possible.
It was hard enough to bounce out of the reagan/bush year deficits that were less than half of the size of the current deficits - and remember the current numbers do NOT inlude the cost of Iraq/Afghanistan...

They have done their jobs well - and continue to attempt to do it moreso - that fiscally conservative and safety net can not both be done. Hell they are already floating their newest tax cuts plan that allows for more tax shelters for the wealthy and for corporations... but is "revenue neutral" - and they consider paying for it.... by disallowing the deductions for local/state taxes and... get this... by cutting out the tax incentive for companies to provide health insurance to employees ... two fer - more money to the top - no help towards the deficit while increasing the number of uninsured and thus greatly expanding the need for a safety net - that can no longer be paid for. Each day, it seems, the damage gets worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I disagree...
Being socially liberal does not necessarily mean higher gov spending and programs. Howard Dean is a good model of a social liberal with a conservative fiscal philosophy. These days the definitions of the various philosophies have been skewed by the big mouths who depend on the listeners not owning a dictionary much less a history book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, higher as opposed to "nothing"
The money can obviously be used more efficiently and the budget itself can be streamlined. However some would argue that it is best to do both; streamline the budget, spend more effectively, AND don't bother with the social programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. To me, socially liberal refers to privacy and individual liberties
Edited on Tue Nov-23-04 09:46 AM by American Tragedy
I can't necessarily speak for the original poster's meaning. Personally, as a hardcore civil libertarian, I consider myself extremely socially liberal. I am fiscally conservative specifically in the sense that Eisenhower was: balance the budget, and decrease excessive and unnecessary subsidy of military, especially when it displaces money from the private sector and our domestic support system. As you read this post, I am typing a report on this very problem.

Ironically, much of the Ike ideal has recently become a staple of the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fiscally responsible Democrats
Fiscal responsibility means that the government is not beholden to any corporate interest. Much like the separation between church and state, there must be separation between business and state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoGreen Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Me too...
and Dean is one of my models for such a point of view.

I have always believed, until this election, that the Dems could win with this political stance.

Bring the Patiot-act-hater and some of the tax-reduction republicans into our camp. Reduce taxes by reducing the fed debt by reducing this insane spending on the CIA/military.

Leave the jesus-freak-repukes (JFR's)to play by themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC