Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where do you think the "Amend for Arnold" nonsense will go?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 01:44 AM
Original message
Where do you think the "Amend for Arnold" nonsense will go?
Edited on Wed Nov-24-04 01:52 AM by Harvey Korman
And how can it be exploited in order to demonstrate these con artists at work bending the Constitution to expand their power?

According to this article, "only 36 percent of the {California's} registered voters want to amend the Constitution to allow {Schwarzenegger} to run for president and only 26 percent said they would vote for him if they did." I guess that bodes well, but the campaign is getting a lot of press and is touting an "enormous response."

Now to make it even worse, these cretins have changed it to "Amend for Arnold and Jen," to make it look like a bipartisan effort. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornfedyank Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. if the country gets to that point of craziness.. great
it will mean that shrub et al have not blown us up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Since They Only Do Things That...
...serve their interests.

What do you think?

They put through a rule about ethics to stop Democrats in Texas years ago. Now that's it's come back to bite them, nope. Lott is OK and immune.

Arnold?

Let's amend the constitution for that one? ROLF.

But then again, they're telling us about a lot of stuff I would never have thought possible.

I never thought we would have another VietNam. Now here we are.

We live in very scary times.

The CHRISTIAN-TALABAN are the "New" Crusaders. (Even W used the C word...but he's an idiot.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. destination............


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LauraT28 Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. http://www.arnoldexposed.com/ go there..
Read all about your boy and pass it on....this is just rediculous. NO other country would even contemplate letting a foreigner run their nation.

http://www.arnoldexposed.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good link, I hadn't seen it. Thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Ahnold is a U.S. citizen, not a foreigner
Furthermore, Canada would let a "foreigner" lead the country:

More than 10% of our Members of Parliament were born outside Canada – 39 of 308.

Link

If the party that forms government chooses one of these MP's as their leader, then that "foreigner" would run Canada. There are no legal provisions to stop it.

I'm waiting for a good answer to this question: what is it about the status of a naturalized citizen that makes a person unqualified to be president? The only answer I've heard to this is vague xenophobia, but no concrete reasons.

Pretty much everybody here agrees that Ahnold sucks. Hence someone must think that the Democratic Party really sucks if we can't beat him. Personally I don't buy it. In the unlikely event he defeats the Christofascists in the primaries, we'd beat him in November. From Aug. to Oct. 2008 some 527 can run a bunch of ads exposing all the items mentioned on the arnoldexposed website. This combined with his association with the party that's been working to destroy America for the last 8 years makes him very vulnerable. If we can't beat that, we can't beat anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. conservative republicans will kill it...
Arnold whored for Bush but that's not enough for true believers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Absolutely....
not!!! When the conservative Republicans finally wake up and find out what Arnold "really" believes in, they will shut up about this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulsh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. President George Soros
President Madeline Albright, that's my response to the few people I know who support the amend for arnold con game. its fun to see the confused look over take their faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. an "enormous responsess"
doesn't necessarily mean an enormous POSITIVE response!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC