Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the proof of napalm be the thing to

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:51 PM
Original message
Will the proof of napalm be the thing to
turn the UN against us? I have to believe the sane countries of the world will not put up with war crimes for much longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why haven't they turned against us yet anyway?


United Nations, if you are listening:

Embargo

Sanctions

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will totally fail
Economic embargoes and sanctions are the jurisdiction of the UN Security Council. The US is a permanent member of that body, and it holds veto power. It would never pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. A 'United for Peace' Resolution would get around a US and UK veto
The US introduced the 'United for Peace' Resolution during the Korean War to get around Soviet vetos after the war started (IIRC).

Bascially, the General Assembly can vote to override a Security Council veto in matters of war and peace. I don't think it's ever been done, and they talked about doing it before the Iraq war but didn't, but the possibility is there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. can't figure that one out
we don't pay our dues, we bless torture, we bomb defenseless, innocent countries, kill women, children, and other non-combatants, and trash the planet. It's a matter of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, we are the most powerful country on the planet. By a long shot.
Like it or not, the US is the most powerful nation. No country, by itself, could equal us. And it would take a semi-respectable nation to stand up and call for some action. BUT, that country would be reduced to ruins. We wouldn't even have to bomb them, just embargo their goods and coerce several other countries into joining as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Uh, no.
I don't support the Iraq war, but I do not want the economic disentigration of the United States. After all, I voted democratic.

Do you have any idea what the embargo would do? All those poor people who I'm sure you claim to want to help, like the homeless, would bear the burden. They would suffer, not the rich, not the Bushes, not the republicans.

It would actually help the repubs. Americans would become even more isolationist, clamoring for revenge against the nations now sanctioning us.

The international community would have to deal with cutting off access to HALF the world's currency. This would throw the rest of the world into economic chaos.

Embargoing the US is a bad idea for everyone. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. 90% chance
according to some economists that economic disentigration is coming no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Don't economists also say that Bush and Tax cuts are good for the economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've been thinking along
the same lines. Only a matter of time till the rest of the world tells this mega arrogant administration to go cheney themselves. It will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It should happen and I can only hope it will happen and very, very
soon, before we kill everyone in Iraq ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. no. torture, eh. cluster bombs, eh.
depleted uranium, eh.

napalm, eh.

whatever.


signed, the spineless UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC