Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My re-emphasis on the importance of party unity once a nominee is chosen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 10:22 PM
Original message
My re-emphasis on the importance of party unity once a nominee is chosen
This fight will probably go on for more than a month. I know that some supporters of some of the losing candidates may be disappointed with tonight's results from Iowa. The race may get a little more nasty too, but once a nominee is selected animosities from primary season must end, and it will be time to re-direct the vitriol toward the Great Satan, George W. Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, I have too many hard feelings after the past year on DU
My sig says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Applauds.
I just got ripped in another thread because I refuse to blindly support yet another Democrat who really isn't a Liberal. I'm voting Green if Dean is not on the ticket, and I am getting a little sick and tired of the "you are the ones that allowed Bush to be elected" line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But Dean isnt liberal.
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 11:28 PM by bhunt70
I dont know why people assert he is. He's not, and he'd tell you that.

edit- Vote Kucinich or even Kerry if you want someone with strong liberal leanings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not liberal?
-Against the war
-Pro-choice
-For Campaign Finance Reform
-For a minimum wage increase
-Does not support "corporate welfare" at the expense of the people
-Supports affirmative action
-Against racial profiling
-Supports equal rights for gays (not second class citizenship)

Also supports a lot of other things that I won't list here (but his web site is a good start to look).

Not a liberal? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. That's everyone's platform...
...except the "Against the War" part.

And in general, other candidates are further left on issues like health care or trade or gun control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. The key being "Against the War"
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 02:49 AM by Disandra
as for the other candidates, as another person already stated on this thread, they bow down to the Republicans over issues of homeland security and violating the constitution.

Also, you asserted that Dean wasn't a Liberal, and I simply stated that your observation was incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hey...I hated Nader because of 2000
But, if Dean isn't the candidate...if we nominate someone who's done nothing but support Bush's policies for the past two years....hell, I'll vote for Nader! Tell him he oughta run!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thank you so much for the personal insult....
...but wasn't you all who "wined and were sore losers" when Gore lost the election because of us Greens? At least, that is why I keep hearing.

Pot, meet kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. The grown-ups? What grown-ups?
The ones telling us to join forces with disgruntled Republicans to get the Republicans out of office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. you guys totally insult a whole group of people then demand
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 02:11 AM by jonnyblitz
loyalty. Aint that the richest load of bullshit i ever heard. give me a break. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Well put...
..it seems the lessons from 2000 were not learned at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I promised myself I wasn't wading back in here, but...
Agree 100% with replies #1 and 2.

There will be no ABB, if one of the candidates who voted for the Patriot Act, the Homeland Security Act, and the Iraq War Resolution gets the Democratic nomination. Instead I'll be doing everything I can to encourage Ralph Nader to run again, or else I'll support another left-wing third party if Nader doesn't run.

It seems that too many Democrats still haven't learned the lesson that Nader taught Gore in 2000. That lesson is, don't betray liberals time and time again and then expect to be "entitled" to liberal votes come election time, because you aren't going to get them.

There are only three legitimate Democratic candidates in the race, namely Dean, Sharpton, and Kucinich, and of those three only Dean is a serious player for the nomination.

Democrats had better keep this in mind when they vote in the primaries and caucuses: Either nominate a candidate who is not tainted by votes in favor of the Patriot Act, Homeland Security Act, and IWR, or we will bolt again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Enjoy four more years of Bush...
I, for one, would give ANYTHING for a Gore Presidency right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm sure he's enjoying his Bush taxcut
Those of us who have to live with the consequences of a Bush presidency know better. There is a reason why Ralph Nader polled poorly with non-white, working class voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Gore would give up his tax cut in a second...
...to undo the damage Bush has done to this country. And so would I. And so would a lot of those people Nader polled well with.

I'm sorry you don't see Bush as more of a threat to this nation than Gore. I really am. It just means I have to work twice as hard for the candidate to make up for your vote because I DO see a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Uh, I agree with you
I think you meant to direct your post to ldooin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldoolin Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. And unlike some people...
I want every one of the Bush taxcuts repealed, which is why I'm supporting the only candidate who is proposing to repeal all of them.

Which makes your accusation above beyond ludicrous. Please redirect it to somebody who is supporting another candidate besides Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Why do you want the entire
tax cut repealed? It makes no sense. I was behind Dean in beginning, but this is one among MANY issues that I disagree with him.

You are going to tell the middle class income workers that they will have to pay MORE in income. Well then you need to sit yourself in the "show" box 'cause it sure won't be the "win" box.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Oh, I appreciate that
I want every one of the Bush taxcuts repealed, which is why I'm supporting the only candidate who is proposing to repeal all of them.

That message will resonate real well in suburban St. Louis, and if you actually believe that then you need to spend more time in the Red counties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Oh... You meant Nader?
I thought you were saying Gore wanted his tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. *Raises eyebrow*
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 02:53 AM by Disandra
I, as a non-white, working class voter, am insulted whenever the "race card" is pulled out. Polls are not all they are cracked up to be, and certainly do not fairly represent the views of all the people in a particular group.

Just because my skin is a bit darker than most "white" people doesn't mean Democrats should automatically expect my vote.

Oh, and as a working class voter with no children, I didn't get a tax break. My sister, a working class, single mother, voter also didn't get a tax break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Memekiller Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
37. Here, here...
I'm a Clark supporter, but what everyone wants (with the exception, it appears, of a few Dean supporters) is to not have another four years of Bush. I think Clark is the best, and I'll work for him with all my heart and soul, but I'll support any of the leading candidates . There's four or five I'd feel totally comfortable with at the top of the ticket. Anyone who remembers all the people who refused to support Gore because he was "the same" as Bush knows there's a HUGE difference between Bush and any one of these candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. Glad to see another person of a like minded view here.
I was feeling kind of lonely. :-)

Very well written, and thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. well then
what do you really want from the Democratic party? If your're going to do a "turn-coat" when you guy doesn't win, why do you support the cause of what the Democratic party stands for?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
35. For them to start acting like Democrats, for starters. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. This is coming from a Dean supporter, so please listen:
You are behaving poorly. Your attitude sucks and is counter-productive.


And if you do follow on your plans, I thank you ahead of time for helping Bush get another four years. It's been a wonderful three years, hasn't it? Well, bend over, here comes another term......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. You're welcome
My only words to those who have pissed on Dean would be to quote the Outlaw Josey Wales:

"Don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nice try bluestateguy
I'm with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreissig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Great Satan
There's no doubt that Bush ought to be defeated, but there's more than one Great Satan running. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who supported Bush's unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country has declared personal values that I find repugnant. There's no way to justify things like slavery, child prostitution, or waging colonial wars.

I don't know if I'd call John Kerry a "Great Satan", but if he's the nominee of the Democratic party, he'll have to pull votes from the Republicans to make up for the ones he won't get from Democrats offended by his war vote. As a matter of strategy I don't think he can do it. For that reason, John Kerry is a poor choice to be the nominee of our party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. My Vote IS Transferable
Disclaimer: I back Clark. Have and will until he wins or drops out.

My vote is transferable to whomever wins the nomination. I'm going to fight like hell for my guy right up to the moment he wins or he concedes and either he'll have my vote for President or whomever wins the nomination will have it.

Why?

Because I happen to feel that voting your conscious is unconscionably selfish if it allows George W. Bush and his administration another four years with what will probably be an increased Senate representation and House representation.

Our only hope of not becoming bought-and-paid-for corporate inputs is going to be getting a Democrat into the White House because otherwise I fear we're looking at a straight Republican pipeline from the Oval Office all the way through both parts of Congress.

I say this to any supporter of any candidate in this race: If your vote is not transferable, how do you manage to make it through life calling yourself a liberal and/or a Democrat and behaving like a garden-variety Republican? They are the party of selfishness. We're not supposed to be the same. If my own candidate said he wouldn't support the nominee I'd brand him with the same iron and move on.

I hope that anyone who feels that their vote is non-transferable now due to whatever reasons they have to feel set upon here on DU, at the national level, state level, or local level will reconsider when the time comes and step up in this time of political peril and vote for whomever our nominee is, because that person will be the best chance for all liberals, be they Democrats or Greens or independents, to get back on a path where we can express our true interests once we've been saved from George W. Bush.

I'm with you, bluestateguy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. Sure - just as long as it's not Clark -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well said, and those who disagree are just petty piss ants and...
fairweather Democrats. They can fuck off as they walk off. A pox on them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disandra Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
36. Wow...
....and you wonder why disillusioned Democrats are a bit pissed off at the DNC, with this kind of attitude? Way to win us back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. The cold hard truth is Democrats or Bush
I'm not trying to fuck you or sell you soup, so I'm not obligated to flatter or cajole you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. Let's see, straight Democratic tickets for more than two decades
and all I have to show for it is a completely right wing government and a party that keeps moving to the right.

I guess the strategy of voting for whatever fuckhead had the (D) after his name didn't work now, did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. You tell me...
if it was such an evidently stupid counterproductive activity, why in the hell would someone continue "for more than two decades"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Because I bought into the fear of what would happen if the Repukes win
crap.

I'm not buyin it any more. Give me a reason to vote FOR the Democrat or I will find somebody else who DOES give me a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Walt, I understand your anger and despair...
but most people vote "against" not "for" It may not be noble, but it has been the state of American politics for the past 40 years ("The Politics of Exclusion")

If you start building/supporting an alternative party now, MAYBE your children's children's children will thank their long gone ancestor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. If that's what it takes
so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. Then people should tone down the gloating
ABB will probably be enough to get my vote, but I won't give anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. The Great Satan, George W. Bush is just one head of the Hydra
Nope... Locking shut the gates of Troy. Too many soldiers at the gate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
26. We should download and save all of vicious threads in which our...
candidates and his supporters were bashed mercilessly. Sometime after Labor Day, we should re-read all those threads and see how motivated we feel to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Isn't that a hollow threat coming from someone in...
a solidly republican state (as you have pointed out before)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. Good thought.
My candidate came in 5th. He got 1.2 (or 3?) % of the delegates. And I'm happy with that. No animosity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC