Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pickering To Retire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 11:38 AM
Original message
Pickering To Retire
Charles Pickering says that the minority stopped the majority from confirming him to a permanent postion on the federal bench. Wah wah wah, so now he thinks he should step down.
This is just strange to me. I think there is a whole lot more here than is being said. bu$h wanted him in so bad, did Pickering do this with KKKarl's approval? chimpy's? Cheney's??

Definitely a missing piece or two here.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/09/pickering.retires.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very curious
They could have probably confirmed him permanently in the next congress so stepping down doesn't make a lot of sense.

Skeletons in the closet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Skeletons
From NY Times, Jan. 17, 2004:
"Judge Pickering was nominated to the appeals court soon after Mr. Bush took office. Senate Democrats argued that he did not deserve elevation because he had written an article as a young man recommending ways to strengthen Mississippi's anti-miscegenation laws, left the Democratic Party in 1964 when the national party tried to integrate the state delegation to the national convention and, more recently, presided over a 1994 trial in which he took extraordinary steps to reduce the sentence of a man convicted in a cross-burning incident."
Those are enough skeletons in the closet for me to oppose this jerk.

More from the NYT article:
"While confirmation of Judge Pickering in the coming session is improbable, he could conceivably be renominated should Mr. Bush win a second term and Senate Republicans win a filibuster-proof majority in the next election.

Reached at his home in Hattiesburg on Friday, Judge Pickering said that he was grateful for the opportunity to serve on the appeals court. By accepting the recess appointment, he leaves his seat on the district court and, if he is not confirmed by the Senate as an appellate judge, will have to retire."
Fine by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Since then, it turned out he outright lied under oath
during the hearings....I think that's the skeleton that's going to keep him from popping up again in front of the Senate in the foreseeable future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. This guy worried me
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 12:47 PM by EC
because of his voting rights record. I figured * wanted him in the district court to cover his election ass. Now that the elections are over, he's not needed anymore...








"Blessed are the peacemakers."...Jesus,Sermon on the Mount
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not so strange...
Since he was snuck in, it's been discovered he lied before Congress about his connections to the white supremacist Mississippi Sovereignty Commission in his hearing (which is perjury). If he popped up in a hearing again, he might well be serving time not long after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. This guy may end up being bush*s "bork". When rehnquist if finally
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 01:59 PM by fob
declared gone, bush* will send up the most heinous, divisive creature ever. It will be a ploy though. He'll be following up with an even MORE heinous choice but one that is not so readily obvious as being such.

The more insane the first choice that is a smokescreen for getting the real SECOND choice, the more dangerous the second choice will be. The Dems should confirm the OBVIOUS first choice louse and put as ugly a face as possible to the theo-con death cult member of the (Formerly Supreme) Supreme Court Memebers.

IMHO.



Edit: forgot my example - Send Pickering up first, then after the fightin' and complainin' about obstructionist dems, they send up...John Ashcroft!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC