pasadenaboy
(877 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:37 PM
Original message |
why does CNN assign Tucker Carleson to cover the Dean campaign? |
|
First Candy Crawley and now tucker. Who next? Rush and Bill ORielly?
I just heard tucker say the reason that Dean lost was because smart democrats wouldn't vote for him.
That's our objective media. What a prick, and what pricks CNN are for having a right wing commenator in a job that should be an objective reporter.
|
youngred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. because Tucker is Dean's biggest fan |
|
they also have begala there, its the crossfire pairs in action not a conspiracy
|
incapsulated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I thought Crawley was officially covering his campaign? Didn't Tucker call the race for Dean?
He's an asshole anyway, why pay attention?
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. it's becuase who they fear in a 50 state race... |
TheDonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It's disgusting how they have the rethug pundits covering real politics |
|
and thinking it will be anything close to balanced.
|
kerry-is-my-prez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Gawd! Talk about adding insult to injury... |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-19-04 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Damn, the bow-tied fop said something I agree with |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |