Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Major Peculiarity of the Bushist Regime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:21 AM
Original message
Major Peculiarity of the Bushist Regime
We all know the Bush boy is a twit royale (insert obligatory nod to his alleged political "skills" as supposed evidence he's not a total moron), but he was sold during the campaign as someone who had resolve--and this was supposed to be a good thing, even when what he was sticking to was demonstrably idiotic, like the war in Iraq, and then the date for Iraqi elections. I think they are now painted into a serious corner on this resolve thing. I don't think they have any problem sticking to any policy no matter how stupid or dangerous. They just demonstrated this recently when Bush insisted that he would rather mortgage the next seven generations rather than raise payroll taxes a little bit to provide a simple fix for Social Security, because that would make him appear "unresolved" on blowing a third of the public retirement fund on the stock market--which will be taking a dive when investors realize the consequences of the government's borrowing trillions of dollars to make the Bush boy look "resolved"--like he said he would. The Bush boobs in the "heartland" just love it when Bush sticks to his guns even as he's shooting himself and every one around him in every limb. They think it makes him a "man." So even though the Bush boy is essentially a lame duck, the Bushists will not be changing this game plan as it seems to buy them a nice big fat constituency of suckers. They may have to feed Bush with idiotic policy to stick to, as he can't be trusted to come up with it himself, but once it's in Bush's pea brain, the bee won't budge.

Now here's the problem for them: what if Bush keels over and dies between now and the next inaugural day? It's not entirely unlikely, given what a target of revulsion they've made him. And who knows what this job is doing to his delicate lazy-assed constitution? So he really might die any day now in the next couple of years, and then what? Will they try to make us believe that Cheney has that same idiot's resolve? With Cheney, the whole chemistry changes. He's not God's chosen. He could even beat Bush in the race to the worms (no relation).

So, you see, they have to hope Bush stays alive so when all hell finally breaks loose to the point that the media actually can't paper it over with stories about murder trials and brawls between fans and professional athletes, the faithful can still be counted on to admire the Bush boy's continuing resolve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ragin_acadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. i don't think bush is a twit boy
i think he's a very intelligent sociopath that has risen to the top as the result of a decades long plan that we will never fully understand, with a well coordinated mass media assault, aided and abetted by corporate news and the segment of the population that is easily coerced by hate, fear, and egocentrism.

the last thing i want is for him to die. then they'll enthrone him forever on our money. that would suck even more than the next four years will.

i would rather bite the bullet, be prepared for massive inflation, a draft, actual terrorism (not the CIA and mossad events in NY), and a wrecked government, just to see 59 million people pull the plug out of the back of their heads and wake up.

when john-boy and billy-bubba-joe get drafted to go fight in fallujah, their mee-maw's and pawpaw's are gonna have somethin' to say about it. and i reckon it won't be good. mebbe' they'll even turn off the tv an' start thinkin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No evidence whatsoever
that he's "very intelligent"; sociopathic or otherwise. The evidence however is very good that he's a psychopathic liar.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ragin_acadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. good point
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 02:54 AM by ragin_acadian
i had heard that he was intelligent; that wouldn't surprise me, i am by no means lauding him, but i am starting to believe that this guy is a master manipulator that convinced half the registered voters in this country that he's roscoe p coltrane, and convinced the other half he's divine. the wedge thing always works: it couldn't be that coincidental that half were saying "he's picking his nose" and the other half were saying "he's picked by god"
at this point, i can no longer believe that he's barney fief with an array of handlers and puppeteers.

i think this guy is the real thing. i know everybody here posts "fascist, fascist, fascist" and they are so close, yet so far away. i think what we actually have is a brilliantly twisted sicko, who has surrounded himself with the best, brightest, and most unscrupulous, to continue the path that Sr., LBJ, and the Reagan, Carter and Kennedy cabinet started. What it is, I don't know. But it exists: Ed Ball/St. Joe, the S&L scandals with all the middle eastern investors - tied right in to BCCI and Iran-Contra, freemasonry, the rise of the police state, wars, defense contractors, the middle east again, land deals, pharmaceuticals....it's a 5000 piece floral puzzle, and we have a few of the outside pieces to start with.

and i think our little dry-drunk, "pull the wings off flies" president is just as much an active part of an ongoing 40 or more year conspiracy, not the chauffer. but we can't disregard him as a dumb-dumb and assume it's the people he surrounds himself with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crasmane Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Low cunning more than intelligence
characterizes his thinking and that of all the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tngledwebb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Oh, he's not that dumb , but he is a dummy.
Groomed and chosen years ago to be a puppet with an earpiece. None of his 'ideas' are original, and the brilliant but utterly evil criminals surrounding him were either picked by his father, and/or are the same batch of criminals behind the old man.

And don't forget- the reason he won this and the last election is simply because they were rigged, with MSM complicity that goes back years. Smart or dumb, puppet or not. A dried dog turd would have won with that backing, and Jesus Christ himself would have lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ragin_acadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. none of his ideas are original, that's why i think they are willing
to do anything, like hijacking airplanes..., to get this same group of people back in the whitehouse over and over again. baker III, rumsfeld, armitage, etc.

it can't be "just" oil, money, and global hegemony: they're already there, and it's too simplistic and blatantly done. i think there is some bigger agenda that we are missing.

i'm not familiar with MSM, enlighten me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. MSM = Mainstream Media
aka The Media Borg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. and not a particularly good one, at that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I'd rather have him on our money than all hell break loose.
If that were the actual choice that is. (He won't be on our money in our life time, unless the Dominionists succeed in forcing a theocracy on us somehow.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. his "resolve" will "dissolve"
in January 2009 -- unless they change the constitution and allow him to be selected yet again

what you have to realize is the problems that bush* has created to date WON'T be his problems to fix after 2008 -- the mess will be in someone else's lap

bush* just has to keep his head above water long enough to increase the repug stranglehold on congress through the 2006 midterms, and pump up the hot air long enough to get another repug in the the whitehouse in 2008

I keep flashing back to a story I read during 2000 campaign -- it told of a particular sticky situation regarding bush*'s texas tax cuts while governor -- the way the tax cut was written, there would be some big boomerang bomb that would kick in. bush* was told about it and asked how things should be handled --- bush* shrugged and smirked and said "...won't be my problem..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. That's exactly how Bush operates all the time.
Not his problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC