Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trippi and bloggers got kicked out of the Q&A sessions in Orlando.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:29 AM
Original message
Trippi and bloggers got kicked out of the Q&A sessions in Orlando.
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 12:31 AM by madfloridian
Trippi included...was kicked out.
These are the meetings with the DNC Executive board and the state party heads. Read this from Jerome Armstrong's diary just now. The poll he refers to is further down the blog. He is a little ticked.

http://www.mydd.com/
Bad bloggers and the State-level DNC
by Jerome Armstrong

SNIP..."There's something wrong when the chairs and executive directors go on and on with their praise toward the internet that's brought millions into the coffers of the DNC, and then turns around and kicks Joe Trippi and his band of bloggers out of the meeting room when the "closed" Q & A with the DNC Chair candidates occurs. You could have walked right in off the street and into the candidate Hall unencumbered, but if you happened to be a blogger, or the guy who brought the strategy of embracing the small donor activist on the net for the Democratic Party, and he's got a blog, out you go.
There's something wrong when DNC Chair candidate Donnie Fowler, during his 5-minute presentation on his candidacy, singles out Matt Stoller as an example of embracing the technological ideas that are going to bring this party forward, and then some DNC staffer walks up to Stoller and tells him he's got to leave the room, because he's a blogger....."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dickie Flatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. *deleted*
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 12:51 AM by Dickie Flatt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yet another reason
to get rid of the insiders who have been running the party into the ground.

Some of those guys couldn't organize a one-float parade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Perhaps no one ever heard of a NDA...
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 12:38 AM by zulchzulu
A non-disclosure agreement...wow...what a concept. No one can write about it until a certain time is over...if that was their worry...

Do the other people have....

email?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
62. Florida Sunshine laws
Do you if they are applicable here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. no, that's for state business
this is the party. It's not part of the Florida state government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yup.. MoreOfTheSame Conventional Wisdom types strike again
Why am I not surprised...:eyes: :eyes: :eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. There are a lot of comments, pro and con, there. Be sure to read.
It is interesting that press was not allowed, but anyone could walk in. I am not sure if it were declared private or not....but if private should not have been open to public...who COULD have been press privately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. We're rolling now!

Not surprising...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. democratic assholes-republican assholes
is there any difference-no. so go to it boys,lick those republican asses. anyone know who do we vote for when it`s all the same party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. One point ...the Florida party is neither blogger nor Dean friendly.
Scott Maddox, the chair, is not fond of Dean, he is not internet literate especially.

I will give credit to our locals, though. They are really paying attention to us. 4 of the 7 elected officers were Dean people. They have lately been appreciate of our organizational abilities, as theirs have been lessened by years of disuse...so credit to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thats it! The democratic party is dead!
I would love to see Dean and Trippi form a new party, Screw these guys!:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
76. Nah. Too much trouble to print up new letterheads.
Keep the party, but take the party away from those guys.

You know, sorta like how Bushco took the republican party away from the Rockefeller republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. and how new blood took over the dem party in 68
then McGovern Commission wrote new rules to include diversity based on demographic of the party in the different states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
92. Yeah, me too
Dean, Trippi, Clark, all in a new party.

It would kick ASS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hey Democratic National Committee
Read.My.Lips: No.More.Money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. This happened in Orlando?
You're expecting to revive the DEm party in Orlando?

Here's a couple of things I'd suggest:

(1) Ask around to find the people who believe in backroom politics, who are on the Rotary Club, who are in the Chamber of Commerce, who belong to a Country Club.

(2) Kick them out of leadership roles.

(3) Elect anybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I read this last night
The public is welcome except for bloggers, after praising the netroots!
I guess hypocrisy is alive and well in the Donkey party as it is in the elephant party! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muchacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. deeply corrupt
I'm not sure the Dem party can be reformed. It might need to die of it's self inflicted wounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldflame Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not surprised
They're tryng to protect their exclusive access to the $$$$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Welcome to DU. I see that you have a firm grasp of the bottom line.
:hi: and welcome aboard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
57. Welcome oldflame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FULL_METAL_HAT Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Just curious: Was "the press" barred from this seesion too?
If so then perhaps the view is that

bloggers == press

There only seems to be one story on it though in google news...
http://news.google.com/news?q=dnc+florida&num=50&hl=en&lr=&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&scoring=d

FMH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FULL_METAL_HAT Donating Member (673 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Comments from MyDD on how the press was actually not invited to some...
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 03:08 PM by FULL_METAL_HAT
http://www.mydd.com/comments/2004/12/11/214744/70/11#11


Re: necessary, no (1.00 / 1)

I can feel your sentiment. Maybe they had their reasons. Did they kick out other media?

The Kentucky Democrat
Americans for Bayh 2008
Proud DLC Member
by kydem on Sat Dec 11th, 2004 at 10:57:37 PM EST
< Parent >


Re: necessary, no (3.00 / 2)

At this meeting there were several events open to the press, others not. They were pretty clearly marked on the agenda, and at the beginning of the session, Mark said exactly what the format would be: 5-minute statements by the candidates at which time press, including bloggers, would be asked to leave so there could be a less-public Q&A and there would be room for the official attendees to sit.
The room was crowded with press and big cameras and photographers. This wasn't really a press event or orchestrated that way. The press was invited to come to the candidate speeches. Matt and Jerome went to several other sessions that weren't supposed open to the press. I didn't see any other press at those, but I could have missed them.

I don't want to get into a fight with Matt and Jerome, because I think they're really great. I love what they do. This just seems like getting mad because you got caught sneaking into the drive-in.

I didn't think it was absolutely necessary to ask anyone to leave, but I'm not an official member of the ASDC and I don't make the rules. I'm just a member of the DNC and was a guest of my state vicechair, who I think is very good.

by Jenny Greenleaf on Sat Dec 11th, 2004 at 11:13:50 PM EST


Re: necessary, no (3.00 / 2)

Jenny,
They kicked out press and only press. Any random person was allowed to walk in off the street and attend. We promised them we wouldn't write about anything in a closed session, but they deliberately kicked us out anyway. Any random person off the street could send an email about what they were watching, tape it, do whatever they wanted with it. But we're bloggers, so we must be different.

Why kick out Joe Trippi? Why kick me out? Donnie Fowler mentioned me in his speech as someone pioneering new technology. What the fuck?

This was idiotic. Just dumb. And rude, too.

by Matt Stoller on Sun Dec 12th, 2004 at 12:32:55 AM EST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That is why I said above to be sure to read the exchanges.
A lot of viewpoints. I for one have trouble seeing how they can leave it open to the public and closed to the press. Still trying to wrap my head around that. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. "Americans for Bayh 2008"
"Americans for Bayh 2008" -- there's a chilling phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You got that right! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm a Republican who feels his party's been hijacked...
I'm beginning to see the pattern emerge here.

It's different, of course, but the acquiescence of one's leaders to the 'Dark Side' is unmistakeable.

I'm for truth.

Justice is on it's way out.

'The American Way' is getting less American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Welcome to the club.
We have some Republicans locally who are feeling like you do. It is a strange feeling to realize what is going on, and how long.

And to have the feeling of not being sure who is in control.

Welcome to the land of the confused.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. We have a one party system. The power players which took
control of the GOP party are the same which took control of the Democratic party.

The people in the GOP party cannot really do anything about their party leadership because their leadership is in power now. The Democratic party however is in a non-powerful position and it is vulnerable.

Now is the only time to try to get the global corporatists out of control of at least one of our political parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Agreed, but I've seen this happen - we're ALL in trouble. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Yes, we are.
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 10:44 PM by madfloridian
Welcome to the land of the disillusioned.
:hi:
And still confused.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #37
85. Welcome Dr. Yes, we're all in deep do do.. I can't tell you what a
relief it is to hear from a republican who is concerned about the direction in which our country is going. We truely are all in this together.

No question about it, we've all be hijacked.

Welcome again. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. Both parties have been hijacked by a neo-faction of PNACers
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 10:54 PM by Tinoire
You have the neo-conservatives and their PNAC

we have the neo-Liberals and their PPI.

They're both the same. http://rightweb.irc-online.org/org/ppi.php

Both parties hijacked and infested by followers of Leo Strauss.


If you need to read up, we've got a ton of research on this but a good place to start (for lurkers) is http://www.pnac.info/blog/archives/cat_the_pnac_opposition.html

There are tons of good research threads here too.

This may be late but welcome to DU Doc :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Hey, Tinoire, that Right Web article is new to me...a little chilling.
So good to see you back with your great research.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. It is chilling but THANK YOU for all the work you've done
keeping on top of the DLC and its treatment of progressives. I've learned a lot from your posts and wish I had bookmarked more of them. The latest "purge" hysteria has me LMAO. Not a peep from the same people complaining today when the DLC said progressives needed to be purged a few months ago.

Do you still have that article or better yet DU link?

A purge is what they're calling our challenge to the vice-grip the DLC has on us :eyes: LMAO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I think they are referring to Beinart's article at The New Republic.
I put the TNR link below as it is subscription. I have one. PM me for more. However, a diarist at Kos is just beautifully irate about it so a link there will clarify a lot of it. I have not read it all, but I read enough to be really really angry and threaten to cancel my subscription. Not that they care. This diary gives enough to understand it and snips some pieces from it.

http://wiseprince.dailykos.com/story/2004/12/2/24558/9557

TNR's Peter Beinart says you're the problem
by Hprof


Thu Dec 2nd, 2004 at 02:45:58 EST
and he's apparently got a new witch hunt ready for you.
The TNR editor's lede piece on their website is headlined:

"AN ARGUMENT FOR A NEW LIBERALISM: A Fighting Faith."

So far so good, right? Kossacks are nothing if not fighters.

But no, silly, he doesn't mean fight for liberalism; he means fight alongside BushCo against Al Qaeda.

And if you won't join in, he wants to run you out of the Democratic party as an un-American terrorist-coddling traitor--just like, as he explains in an analogy to Cold War anti-communism, the Democratic party "purged" itself of Henry Wallace and anyone with the faintest taint of pink during the late 1940s."

http://www.tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20041213&s=beinart121304
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Will PM you
I am specifically looking for the call from a DLC official (not that TNR hasn't always been a neo-liberal organ).

I cancelled my subscription to TNR over 6 years ago. Every once in a while, I'll find one in the doctor's lounge and leaf through it. Every single time, I get sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
55. That rightweb link is fantastic!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #55
66. Thanks. I've bookmarked it for the next PNAC/PPI thread. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #42
91. Tinoire!!! So glad to see you post again!
I'm late in replying to this thread; my computer crashed. :(

I missed ya. The links you've provided are spot on. I discovered PPI many months ago while cruising through a different website. I will take the time to look into the "rightweb site" later. Thanks

I'm encouraged that so many folks are now coming to the realization we've been "had" by our party.... Certainly there are some decent representatives left on each side, but the trends in each party going forward, for us and for the repubs is NOT GOOD.

I just watched a fella on C-span this morning: 12/13/04, Peter Beinart from "New Republic Magazine". He spoke of the "New Liberals"...uh huh. He said some liberals are "hard" libs, others (those that oppose war as a means to the end) "Soft" libs.

A republican caller-in said Beinart sounded just like himself and it scared him! These New Liberals give lip service to old fashioned social repsonsibility, social programs and the individuals freedoms/rights...but, I hardly expect those types to try to save social security, for example. They have their wagon hooked up to the imperialist/profit mongering bandwagon. They are not the sort that believe in using alternative actions to resolve enemy threats either.

Peter Beinart thought that Michael Moore was a HUGE problem for LIberals; thought Moore should be renounced! He had few kinds words for Moveon either.

I'd be interested to learn what we are going to do about all this.
(How about we all get together and storm Washington, drag out ALL the politicians, kick their butts...then replace them with people WE want to represent us?!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #91
96. Hi Sugarbleus!
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 01:40 AM by Tinoire
Good to see you're still here fighting the good fight & standing up for justice!

Beinart is a real slime ball. That little neo-liberal ass been calling for a purge of progressives (aka "soft liberals") for a long time now and needs to GO. NOW! Thanks for that re-cap, I was at work and missed it but frankly, I don't think I could have say through it. My hat is off to you!


    "What Clinton recognized--and today's Democrats don't--is that, if you're not making liberals uncomfortable, you're not going to win.

    In my view, John Kerry's Sister Souljah opportunity was France. Liberals forget that the conflict between Washington and Paris didn't begin with Dick Cheney; France was actively thwarting American power--and American ideals--throughout the 1990s. Jacques Chirac had the right to oppose the Iraq war, but his virtual campaign to prevent European countries from assisting in the occupation rightly outraged many Americans. Had Kerry stood up to Paris during the campaign, he would have shown he could do so in the Oval Office. And he would have proved that success in the war on terrorism--not multilateralism--was his highest foreign policy principle.

    But, while Joe Biden repeatedly criticized European leaders for their complacency in the battle against Islamist barbarism in Iraq, Kerry never did."


If only Kerry had cynically engaged in France-bashing he could have won! Never mind that the French government (along with the Germans and the Russians) was rightfully dubious about the claims made by the Bush administration that Saddam Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction! Never mind that Iraq was one of the more secular countries in the Middle East--it was full of "Islamist barbarism!" ("Peter Beinart" , neo-Liberal)

It's attitudes like Beinart's that are what's really killing any attempt to put Democrats back in government. As I mentioned yesterday the DLC's campaign to move the party to the right is not working to get people elected. At least not Democrats.

http://www.darrelplant.com/blog_item.php?ItemRef=140
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #96
98. Great! is dp.com your site?
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 02:34 AM by Sugarbleus
It's soooooooo refreshing to see/read you again. I've been "itching" to DO SOMETHING, something real and frank. To LOOK at what we're dealing with and FIX IT/change it!

Let ALL the bumbling, side stepping, and lies fall out onto the table (left & right) and let us sort out where we/progressives are in this mess. Gotta take the good news with the bad, be honest about what's happening, organize ourselves, and go forward.

NO MORE of this lukewarm, republican-lite crap. We're either a viable party of the people/for the people, or we're a doormat.

I hope you are well. I've thought of you often (especially regarding the info on Haiti) :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
83. You know Dr.
I'm really beginning to wonder what the hell is going on, too.

And I hate to put on the tin foil, but I really think you are on to something.

Our hijacking has been less obvious, but the collusion of one evil group grabbing power and the other group just rolling over and dying is really making me wonder....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
93. Wow, finally someone sees the truth! Your party HAS been hijacked!
And what shocks me the most about the current state of the GOP is that most GOPers don't seem to mind! Or care! As long as they "beat the other side".

It's sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kos makes a good comment on this just now.
I had not thought of it this way, which shows that blogging is a relatively new concept.....these guys are allies in a way. Or should be. The GOP certainly uses their resources like this to get the word out, and the Democrats are again afraid of it.

SNIP.."People may disagree on the party's ability to keep "press" out of certain events. But Democratic bloggers aren't "press". We're not disinterested observers chronicling events. We're engaged and active in the fight to rebuild our party, and as such, deserve, at very least, to stand in the back wall and observe those events that have an impact in our party..."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/12/12/142954/66
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ivolsky Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. How we know if we lost our party...
There is something wrong with the Democratic Party... and there is a good case to be made for Howard Dean as its "reformer" (not savior, but reformer). However, this is not at all surprising. The Big Power players don't want to loose any influence to such "loose cannons" as Dean. The people need to rally behind him. And if that does not guarantee his selection, we'll know that we've lost our party once and for all.

more here: www.politicalthought.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
59. Welcome ivolsky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BUSHOUT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. Maybe "Trippi" and his bloggers were being jerks...
There's usually two sides to every story and this is definitely only one side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Right.
Close it to the press, and let all the public in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. Tell me, please, since WHEN can so-called "bloggers" sit in
on executive sessions or other closed sessions of any political organization? Huh? Since when do these "bloggers" have *special* privileges?

Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. You don't need to be rude, I was just posting it.
Not sure how I feel about it. I am amazed at the tenseness here today and the rough remarks.

Actually the Republican party VERY effectively uses its "bloggers" and internet sources...you know, like Sludge or the forums they use?
They use them, they don't shut them out. They "get the word out" through them.

Note the paragraph I posted from Kos today. We can discuss or we can say "get over it." It is here, the bloggers are part of the party whether the party likes it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Again, so-called *bloggers* have no right to admittance to a
closed session or executive session of any political party. Why? Because a political party selects who sits as DNC executive board and the state party heads . . . a so-called "blogger" is not. Quite simple, really. As such they have no party privileges. Nothing to wax and whine about . . .

Again, get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. It is my understanding that some of the sessions that the
bloggers were kicked out of were open to folks just walking in off the street... if that assessment is correct - than this wasn't a case of closed executive sessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. I heard from friends who just entered the sessions.
One of them is a new state committee person, and no id was available yet. So I guess that part is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. What is the real point of this article?
Is this intended to show a top-level dictatorship taking over the Democratic party? Is this intended to show how this session works? Why would bloggers be asked to leave, but not press and random citizens? What do they have to lose by having bloggers in along with official press members and random people off the street?

In looking at this, I am still unclear as to whether the private part of the meeting excluded bloggers, or the whole thing. If bloggers are excluded from all parts, this could be a significant reason that people like John Kerry kept money away from the DNC. I think that the Kerry money scandal just became an insight into his strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. ROFLMAO . . .
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 10:10 PM by TaleWgnDg
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:tinfoilhat:


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Huh?
Why the tinfoil hat response? If this is just about procedure, why did it make the home page at DU? What is the point of the article then? The link is to a Blog, not a news article. Outside of showing that the DNC doesn't really understand the power of blogging, I don't understand the point of this article being on the home page at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Would guess
that folks who think that some who are entrenched inside of the beltway do not "get" the power of netorganizing are those who would vote the item onto the home page. Just a guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. I did not put it on the home page.
Did not know it was there. Confused as heck. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. I have no clue what you are saying.
I posted it because I saw it, I was following the conference, and I decided it was interesting.

I think it shows that the Republicans get the word out through their guys, and we aren't sure how to use ours. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
41. Trippi is a hack
he's just another another consultant and he was fired because he ripped off the Dean campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Dave, my friend, that is very judgmental.
You don't know that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. actually I do
from a top money guy in the Dean campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. Trippi not returning Dean's phone calls in Iowa would be my last straw...
When Dean's campaign was running into (insert whatever you want here), Trippi was hanging out in New Hampshire and not returning his phone calls.

Could you imagine yourself running for President and wanting advice and your campaign manager NOT returning your phone calls and other requests of support.

Trippi apparently was too paranoid that he would lose his gig if he left New Hampshire in the last weeks leading up to the Iowa caucus.

A bit about that:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/TheNote/TheNote_July904.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #41
61. ripped off or squandered the money?
The Dean campaign blew all their money on Iowa, but that is not the same as saying Trippi stole it. He's been remarkably loyal to Dean considering he was fired. If they have proof that he embezzled money, they should bring charges. Otherwise, it's not right to smear him that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #61
77. There is a lot of money unaccounted for
and Trippi had no answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. I have to say he doesn't look like he spent it on clothing
It's possible he ran a poorly organized campaign. Not to say that is acceptable, but theft is a serious change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. I'm just relaying
what I was told. Regardless, he shouldn't be anywhere near the DNC job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #84
99. Hear-say does not stand up in a court of law.
Edited on Tue Dec-14-04 03:19 AM by tedzbear
"I have a friend who told me..." is bullshit. Show me the facts.

edit:sp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #99
103. I'm not saying it would stand up in court
I'm relaying what some high level Dean people told me. Hear-Say is relevent in hiring decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpboy_ak Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #103
105. So you have no proof, and are libeling him?
> "I'm not saying it would stand up in court"
> Posted by DaveinMD

> I'm relaying what some high level Dean people told me.
> Hear-Say is relevent in hiring decisions.

and how many people have YOU hired? Do you have any idea about whether it's legal to consider unproven rumors when hiring?

You're just a smearing troll, with no proof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
44. Well of course. They got everyone's vote & money
They don't need liberals and progressives meddling now.

We've served our purpose as has ABB.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hebegirl Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. Fed Up Once and For All with the One-Two Party System
I did a google search for the Working Families Party, the history of third, fourth and fifth parties in this country is VERY interesting.
So is the systematic shutting out of those parties. I agree with the read my lips: No.More.Money to the Dems from me, at least not at the national level. Tired of being used and abused. Kerry and Edwards couldn't even stand up and say they will stand for equal rights for gays in terms of legal "marriage" or whatever. What sealed it for me was hearing this one dude (possible candidate for DNC chair0 interviewed on Majority Report this past weekend. When he said he thought the war in Iraq was "defensible." To me it is not only indefensible, but an international crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Welcome to DU Hebegirl. Totally agree... International Crime!
TOTALLY INDEFENSIBLE and I have no more patience for it.

I will either take my Party back and transform it IN TIME FOR THE NEXT ELECTIONS or walk away.

I stopped giving money to the party long ago. My money has only gone to people who represent me for the last few years.

How much reading have you done on PNAC, the PPI and the DLC? Real eye-opening subjects.


Behind the DLC Takeover, By John Nichols

By John Nichols

At the national convention of a major political party, an ideologically rigid sectarian clique secures the ultimate triumph. It inserts two of its own as nominees for the Presidency and the Vice Presidency. Heavily financed by the most powerful corporations in the world, the group's leaders gather in a private club fifty-four floors above the convention hall, apart from the delegates of the party they had infiltrated. There, they carefully monitor the convention's acceptance of a platform the organization had drafted almost in its entirety. Then, with the ticket secured and with the policy course of the party set, they introduce a team of 100 shock troops to deploy across the country to lock up the party's grassroots.

This is not some fantastic political thriller starring Harrison Ford or Sharon Stone. This is the real-life version of Invasion of the Party Snatchers--with the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) burrowing into the pod that is the Democratic Party.

Founded in the mid-1980s with essentially the same purpose as the Christian Coalition--to pull a broad political party dramatically to the right--the DLC has been far more successful than its headline-grabbing Republican counterpart. After Walter Mondale's 1984 defeat at the hands of Ronald Reagan, a group of mostly Southern, conservative Democrats hatched the theory that their party was in trouble because it had grown too sympathetic to the agendas of organized labor, feminists, African Americans, Latinos, gays and lesbians, peace activists, and egalitarians.

And they found willing corporate allies, in corporate America, who provided the money needed to make a theory appear to be a movement. In the ensuing fifteen years, the DLC's impact on the American political debate has been dramatic. The group now controls much of the upper-level apparatus of the Democratic Party.

(snip)

The rest of this good read can be found here: http://www.progressive.org/nich1000.htm

If you're interested in the DU research on this, just ask. There's plenty of it and dating from waaaay back.

Welcome! :toast:

Help us take our party back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #54
64. We had a wide array of choices in the 2004 primaries
and for some reason most people felt a need to run out and vote for Kerry. They could have chosen Dean, Mosley Braun, Sharpton, or Kucinich, but Democratic voters chose otherwise. There is obviously more to the problem than Al From and his crowd. The main DLC candidate, Lieberman, got no where in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. 37 states did NOT have a wide array....I did not get to vote for Dean.
I was in one of those states. I counted 37 states who voted after Dean dropped out. Others can count when their candidate dropped out and compare.

Somebody got some 'splaining to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. I voted for him in Florida
Edited on Mon Dec-13-04 10:36 AM by imenja
even though he had dropped out. Remember the only state he won was VT, and he withdrawn from the race by then. I believe he remained on the ballot in all of the states. Florida had a very late primary, and he was on ours. So you might not have chosen to vote for him, but I'm pretty sure you could have done so. Kucinich remained in the race until the convention.
Please see my post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #70
75. Oh, come on. Your vote did not count, neither did mine.
Of course it was just a useless gesture. I do not like the way you make it sound ok. It is not ok. I should have had a real voice in the primaries, not a gesture.

There are real problems, I am sorry but there are. Glossing over the issues will not help anymore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. I agree about the primaries but
Democratic voters chose to vote for Kerry. They weren't forced into doing so. I never understood it at the time, but they obviously had their reasons. You seem to have the idea that Americans are sheep without minds of their own. The accelerated structure of the primaries helped the Iowa victor, Kerry, but with the conventional wisdom--that money buys elections, Dean should have been able to win. He did not. Democrats made an unfortunate choice. We need to accept responsibility for that.
Of course, there is always the distinct possibility, perhaps even likely, that if Dean would have won the primary the Dem's still would have lost the general election. Then we'd now be facing a tide of strategist arguing that a progressive , more "leftist" (whatever than means anymore) was a huge mistake. At least we now have an open debate on the subject where the more progressive elements stand a chance to exert some influence. If we can't do that at the national level, we need to make it happen at the local level, as Democracy for America is working for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. Democratic voters in 37 states did not get the full slate.
I am sorry, but that is the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. Ok, how do we change that?
Is spreading out the primary schedule enough? What else do you suggest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #82
87. Not sure.
There is discussion going on here about moving FL primaries, but I have not heard which direction.

The only way everyone can have a say is a same day primary. It has drawbacks, but so does every other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. wouldn't a same day primary just exacerbate the question you raised?
Wouldn't the problem with front loading primaries would be made all the worse? It would also greatly increase the amount of money candidates would have to raise, making it less possible for non-establishment candidates to get elected.
One thing I object to is Iowa and New Hampshire having such power in the process. Iowa didn't even vote Dem this election, and New Hampshire didn't in 2000. Perhaps Illinois or Minnesota would be a better state to have the first primary/ caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #90
94. But that leaves out the states with the largest number of electoral votes.
And the largest populations. FL, NY, and CA. There has to be some way that all can vote for the full slate. They still have to spend a lot of money to concentrate on the early states.

All that would do is give two other states the power to choose the nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #94
97. perhaps
True, but a same day primary would be primarily a media campaign, like the general election. I suppose it's worth a shot, but I don't think it would result in better candidates. In fact, I think it would eliminate many who couldn't come up with the hundreds of millions of dollars that kind of primary will cost.
Kerry had raised relatively little money before the Iowa caucuses. Once he had won there and New Hampshire, he started to get more donors.
These are difficult questions and no solution is ideal. That's one reason I'm not so quick to condemn the party leadership. I'm not so sure I could come up with a better arrangement myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #82
101. Change New Hampshire and Iowa to California and New York.
Then you will see Dean get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Question is. ...
if having the bluest of blue states choose the nominees would make it more difficult to win in the general election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. Not if you call them purple states and go there and work hard.
Not if you start now, as DFA has, in electing and building grassroots who then are locally available to campaign and work for the party. We have not had that, not here. We have had a party here whose mindset was, we can't win so we won't try.

DFA only started in March, and there has been a lot change in attitude in many areas. 4 of 7 in our local DEC were Dean supporters who were inspired to get active. Two were elected state committee persons.

You start local, and then you build from local groups and candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. Imenja. Please. I was here for the Primaries
I still have threads of the dirty tricks that were pulled by the Kerry goon squad, the suits that would show up at Primaries to "re-arrange" things. Still have threads of the suits trying to intimidate little old ladies, Primaries that were delayed for hours for a "special suprise" which was Kerry showing up, and voters in non-Kerry supporting areas being as disenfranchised as people were in Florida for the 2000 elections.

People who watched closely are very well aware of what went down.

This spin now that Kerry was not the DLC candidate is amusing and insulting to people's intelligence. Do not think for one minute that some of us weren't watching the sheenanigans at the DLC closely. We know who attended their annual event, who spoke, what they said, what was said, and who was wined and dined. Kerry, Lieberman and Clark were the DLC candidates. Edwards, of whom I'm no big fan, was the "moderate" the most distanced because of a falling out he had with the DLC over NAFTA.

Please stop trying to rewrite history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. Dem voters also bear responsibility and can also bring about change
I'm not aware of the details you raise. I wasn't reading DU then. But the fact is people did vote for Kerry in the primaries. I wasn't one of them. I voted for Dean, even though I was in Florida which had one of the last primaries, so he had already dropped out. My point is that Democratic voters bear responsibility as well--not just a few Machiavellian characters behind the scenes.
Dean had more money that the rest of them put together, but sadly his campaign self destructed. Obviously the media was gunning for him, but he gave them ammunition.
Kerry is very much a mainstream Democrat. On many issues, more traditionally liberal than Dean (spending, gun control, the death penalty). Obviously I preferred Dean. Kerry was near the bottom of my list of the Dem candidates, but I nonetheless worked very hard for him in the general election. The point I'm trying to make is that we as voters and activists need to take some responsibility and initiative for the direction the party takes. As Dean reminds us, we can bring about change if we organize. The greatest accomplishment of the establishment is to convince people we can't change things. We must refuse to accept that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. They rushed the primaries on purpose. "Rushing into 2004" The Nation.
Iowa, just that one state, and perhaps NH actually picked the nominee. David Jones on C-Span this week admitted to the Osama ad and admitted that the 527 funded by 20 other Democrats was fully intended to "take Dean down" in Iowa. He used those words over and over. The video is still up there.

Now, I have been posting here about the front-loaded primaries until I am practically hated.....now I see they are considering changing it.

However, since Terry Mac was responsible for these primaries, why should he try to fix it...why not wait and let the new chair do it? Note the comment by Don Fowler, daddy of Donnie Fowler.

Here is an article about it: Racing into 2004...it was written last year by John Nichols.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20030217&s=nichols

SNIP.."Early in 2002, Democratic National Committee chair Terry McAuliffe and his allies at the DNC quietly engineered a reworking of the primary and caucus schedule that all but guaranteed the fastest-starting and fastest-finishing nominating process in American political history. Rule changes implemented by the DNC moved the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary dates deep into January 2004--maintaining what Michigan Senator Carl Levin condemned as the "perpetual privilege" of those two small, overwhelmingly white and disproportionately rural states--and then cleared the way for one more "retail" primary in South Carolina, on February 3. With big states and regional clusters of smaller states expected to grab every subsequent Tuesday in February for their primaries, the surviving candidates will then find themselves locked in a high-stakes, big-money-fueled, television-and-tarmac-driven sprint. Within weeks after Iowans straggle out of their midwinter caucuses, voters will choose thousands of delegates to the Democratic National Convention.

Barring an atypical campaign in which relatively evenly matched contenders wrestle to a draw that prevents a clear frontrunner from emerging--a circumstance that last occurred in 1976, when challenger Ronald Reagan dogged President Gerald Ford into the Republican National Convention--the safe bet is that the Democratic race will be over long before most Democrats have begun to focus on it. "Front-loading favors well-known, well-financed candidates," admits former DNC chair Don Fowler, one of the chief architects of schedule changes that added his home state of South Carolina to the axis of electorally influential states....."

Sorry, but this is the responsibility of the party. All we can do is gripe and push.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #71
72. they thought it would solidify the campaign against Bush

Obviously it was a big mistake.
If all we do is gripe, we are guaranteed continued disappointment and electoral disaster. No one is going to descend as our savior. The pols work for us. We need to make that clear to them. Move On is on the right track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. And DFA is doing a good job. We work hard with those candidates.
We supported financially and otherwise judges, school board members, etc.

I do more than gripe. But I will never get over the outrages I saw during the primaries the horrible 3 hours on C-Span. Those guys are pure hacks and proud of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. Outrage is good
as long as it translates into action, which you clearly are doing. I have the idea that lots of people on these boards prefer to complain foment division rather than do anything, and that bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #69
86. I won't disagree with your points. Not at all.! Here though is some info
on the shenanigans you missed... These are just a few- there were many more. Thank you for a lovely post btw.

Detroit caucus sites stay open extra two hours; black leaders call for new election

By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN
The Associated Press
2/7/04 6:11 PM


LANSING, Mich. (AP) -- The leaders of four black statewide groups may challenge the results of Saturday's Democratic caucuses because some caucus sites weren't open or had been moved, Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus Chairman Derek Albert said.

"We feel very strongly that African-Americans were disenfranchised today. ... You had people running from site to site looking for where they could vote. ... We're calling for a new election," he told the Associated Press.

<details snipped>

"This is worse than in the '60s," said Albert, who also is chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus. "This is horrible. This election needs to be stopped. Because this is not right."

<snip>

Dean state director Daren Berringer had said changing polling places at the last minute hurt voters, especially in low-income areas such as Detroit where people might not have arranged transportation to get to a caucus site outside their neighborhood.

"They're walking to their polling place, and they're finding their caucus site has been changed," Berringer said. "The sites in Detroit and Southfield are in minority areas. This is direct voter disenfranchisement."

<snip>
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/base/news-11/1076181242303271.xml
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=290602#290612

====
Detroit caucus sites stay open extra two hours
Black leaders call for new election
Saturday, February 7, 2004 Posted: 6:42 PM EST (2342 GMT)


LANSING, Michigan (AP) -- The leaders of four black statewide groups may challenge the results of Saturday's Democratic caucuses because some caucus sites weren't open or had been moved, Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus Chairman Derek Albert said.

"We feel very strongly that African-Americans were disenfranchised today. ... You had people running from site to site looking for where they could vote. ... We're calling for a new election," he told the Associated Press. "We just went through this in Florida in 2000. Michigan should be above this. The Democratic Party should be above this. We're not going to tolerate this."

(snip)

Democratic caucus sites in the city of Detroit were staying open an extra two hours Saturday because of problems earlier in the day with some sites being moved or closed, the party said. During the extended hours Saturday, voters could vote at any caucus site in Detroit rather than just the one they had been assigned previously.

Michigan Democratic Party Executive Chairman Mark Brewer said all sites in Detroit would stay open until 6 p.m. EST, while sites in the rest of the state closed as scheduled at 4 p.m. EST. But a check of several Detroit sites found them closed after 4 p.m.

(snip)

Edwards state director Derek Albert, however, said most of the moved sites were affecting minority voters and were robbing them of their right to vote. "This is worse than in the '60s," said Albert, who also is chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party Black Caucus. "This is horrible. This election needs to be stopped. Because this is not right."

Dean state director Daren Berringer had said changing polling places at the last minute hurt voters, especially in low-income areas such as Detroit where people might not have arranged transportation to get to a caucus site outside their neighborhood.

(snip)

http://www5.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/07/elec04.prez.democrats.caucus.ap/

================================
We also said good things about the other candidates, and that people shouldn't vote on who is popular, but who they believe in. That even if your candidate didn't win, maybe they could influence the candidate that did. That the party deserved the continued dialog, and the whole country deserved it's say so, to heal this country/party, so that we would be united. That people need to think and decide for themselves. And lots of "FACTS" Yes that ugly five lettered word!!!

The Kerry Krew then get up there, or as I like to call them at this cozy town hall meeting, "The Suits" A lifer and his trainee. This guy's dropping names and showing he's a real good "Smiler" The whole "I'm one of you" They play on fears, they praise their boy. They let everyone know, "Hey, This election is over. So, we're going to pass a paper around, everyone write your name down, and get on board the Kerry train."

Well Killingworth, CT didn't buy into it. They had a mind of their own. They started asking questions. "The Suits" started dancing around the topics, getting fuzzy. Saying things that weren't true. When people started disagreeing with them, they tried to get the people to listen but not speak, at their own town meeting. "The Suits" started acting like they were running the show, and not invited. They started saying the information wasn't in on the war yet, not true. They started saying raising lots of money from special interest was a good thing, now is it? When Killingworth showed they had a mind of its own, that liked many different candidates, "The Suits" put on their coats and got out of there. All the other reps stayed to shake hands and talk.

I'm not saying we won Killingworth over to Kucinich, because we didn't (Though we did good in Washington and Maine) I'm saying Killingworth could think for it's self, and was tired of being told what to do, and I really think that great group of people won't make up their mind until March 2nd. I hope all of America is starting to get like Killingworth. If Kerry wins, Kerry wins, but let our party be heard, let it run to the Convention. No more tricks or suits. Real people, real issues, for a real candidate.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=295891#296406

====

Hoppin_Mad Mon Feb-09-04 12:30 AM

23. Not if they're true - Here is one first-hand account from WA


"Here is what happened in my precinct. We won 4 delegates for DEAN because none of the other candidates were viable. In our precinct Dean had over 71% of the votes...

BUT

When I went to the 36th district HQ's to find out what the caucus numbers were for the whole district and I looked on the computer that AMY HAGPOLAIN was entering data on - I discovered she had completely reallocated the delegate allocation for my precinct! She had entered only 1 DELEGATE FOR DEAN (instead of 4) and gave 1 delegate to Clark (note - we did not have a single Clark supporter at our precinct caucus), 1 to Edwards, and 1 to Kerry in my precinct - The precinct that went 71.1% for DEAN with no other candidate being viable or receiving a delegate. That single error affected Dean's delegate count by 1% at the Congressional District level. Looking further into the available paperwork, I found another error in another precinct that was next to mine at the caucus. Of the twelve precincts I had time to look at, I found two errors that gave delegates to Kerry that were not his. I also noticed that the head count in our district said we had 13 people signed in, when it was actually 21!!! That effects the percentage for viability and the delegate allocation!

This woman (AMY) got unbelievably angry (defensive) with me as soon as I pointed out the mistake. She immediately started berating me and started a big argument. We had quite an unpleasant shouting match. Then, she and another 36th District Official named PETE started a viscious passive aggressive game, blaming me for keeping them there to late, calling me a jack-ass, on and on and on. Eventually, they won the battle with the District Chair to stop the recount that we had in progress. I made them all stay as long as I could and we started recounting precincts to make sure that the sign-in (head count) numbers were accurate. We found that the majority of the precinct head counts (from the sign-in sheets) were under counted by one or two people and in some cases by as much as 5 to 10 people!!! A couple of the precincts were over counted.

Then PETE (last name unknown) told the Chair that no copies of the minutes needed to be made and he would keep them at his house. He started loading the Caucus Minutes into his car to take to his house and AMY was taking out tons of paperwork (I don't know what, exactly) while we were discussing when to start the recount again... the few people on my side who were trying to get the re-count done gave up as Pete and Amy talked the Chair into counting tomorrow and then she let them take all the minutes and delegates papers out the door... UNBELIEVABLE… I could not have made this up if I had tried my best! Truth IS stranger than fiction.

THE DEMOCRATS ARE F&^%ED in this District and, quite possibly, this state! I was treated so horribly for finding that first mistake and only wanted to look for more problems. Based on my intial findings this woman named AMY was either (1) inept or lazy and didn't care that she entered the data wrong or (2) she was stealing delegates from DEAN. Either way, it was wrong. When she was asked to correct her error and to look for others - she lost it and BLEW UP! She and her cohort Pete had absolutely no interest in accuracy... they kept repeating to me - "The election is over... Kerry won". They weren't accountable to anyone! This is not about who won - at least not now, anyway. This is about all of the votes at the caucus getting accurately counted so that the delegate allocation is correct. People like AMY and PETE need to be banned from doing this kind political work. I felt like I was a REPUBLICAN 'hanging chad' Party in Florida - or at least what I imagined it to have been like..."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=295375#295472

MrsGrumpy (1000+ posts) Mon Feb-09-04 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #96

97. I worked on phone banking to get the vote out for the caucuses. While


we were phone banking it became apparent that the caucus sites were wrong. Really wrong. Phone calls were made and all were assured that the problem was corrected. It was, in some places. It is now obvious that all of the corrections were not made. I am really angry about this. We did a lot of work and it doesn't show in the voter turn out for Detroit.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=295375#296393

====

Egnever (1000+ posts) Sat Feb-14-04 07:04 PM
Original message
My Vote went to Dean!


What a strange day it was today here in Nevada.

Today we had our caucus and I was fortunate to be able to cast my vote for the candidate I believe in. Not because the party wanted me to but because I stood my ground.

Strange things that happened today,

Kerry showed up outside the caucus. Apparently thats his right but I found it extremely strange that a candidate should be standing outside on the steps while the people are making their decision. It wouldn't have bothered me nearly as much that he showed perhaps if he hadn't been an hour and a half late and they hadn't held up the vote till after he had time to make his appearance.

Yup thats right Voting was supposed to begin at 9:30 but it didn't begin till 12:30

Rules were changed throughout the process which is something I also thought was strange.

Originally we were supposed to gather in the football field of the a local high school where we would wait till our precincts were called to go into a room that was filled conspicuously with only Kerry posters to cast our votes and elect our delegates. How Kerry was the only one allowed to have posters in the original voting room is beyond me but hey thats politics I suppose.

The Dean camp made arrangements for one of our representatives to stay in the football field and make us aware of when our precincts were called so we could show our support outside the room since we were unrepresented inside of it.

This lasted all of 15 minns before the fire marshals decided that it was unsafe to have people waiting in the courtyard outside the classroom ???? so we were all told that the caucus would be held entirely on the football field.

So off we marched to the football field our Dean contingent gathered on the field and we held our signs high in support of our candidate, There much tongue wagging ensued from the "democratic party leaders" on how we remembered Vietnam and how proud we were to be patriots willing to stand up against this war and asking how many veterans were in the crowd!

I wanted to puke. Our caucus had obviously become a Kerry rally from the top down from holding the voting till after he made his appearance to the speakers pushing the whole Vietnam veteran thing and thanking all the other candidates supporters for participation in their caucus.

The last thing to happen before we were sent to our corners for our precincts was a group of Kerry supporters came and stood in front of us as Kerry signs were passed out to them. Whole football field to stand in and they choose to come line up directly in front of us and then get their signs handed to them I was appalled at the gall but thats politics I guess.

The one thing I heard repeated over and over by the Kerry folks when asked why they made their choice for Kerry was.....

He seems like he is going to be the winer.....

WTF?

I didn't find one Kerry supporter that had anything else to say about him other than that.

It was amazing the number of people that came there completely uninformed about their candidates. Including the "democratic leadership"

In his speech before the voting the Kerry representative Said we wanted a candidate that could take on the bush administration against an unjust war against ashcroft and the patriot act and against things like no child left behind that was ruining our education system.

I could only roll my eyes as the crowd cheered and went off to vote.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=335557



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #64
100. DLC wanted Lieberman? Then they ARE really Repugs!
Case closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. Welcome Hebegirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
52. To give an example of lack of interaction...Florida website not updated.
The JJ dinner was in June. That is the latest event listed.

http://www.fladems.com/Events2004.shtml

The other events are the convention from last December, and the Donkeys' Rock tour from 2003.

I remember when it seemed to be more up to date.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #52
63. average age of DEC board member in Palm Beach county is 75
I've got nothing against senior citizens. They are great party loyalists, but the Florida party definitely needs new energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
talk hard Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
56. Like Moveon said about the Democratic Party ...
We bought it, we paid for it, and we're taking it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
60. Is it really because he's a blogger...
or that he's not eligible to vote for DNC chair? There are only 400 odd voting members. I know it's pretty exclusive, but I don't know what the requirements are.
Regardless, it is symptomatic of the problems of the party. If there are going to exclude the base--and even campaign managers like Trippi--no wonder they have trouble communicating with the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #60
88. They ran the press, including bloggers, out but not the public.
Heard from friends who were there for all of it, just went in. To have the public free to come, but run the press out is not very good. You are right.

The Republicans use the sites like FR and a couple of others, they have bloggers, and use Drudge. The Democrats here in Florida are a little fearful of the internet and all the fringe folks it brings into the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obiwan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
89. For what it's worth, the TSA doesn't want me.
I took their standardized personality profile/ English usage/ cognizance test for airport baggage screener, and failed it.

This test was very similar to other tests I have taken over the last 15 years. I have never "failed" one of these tests.

The test was a scheduled 3 hour computer test, which I was easily able to complete in 1 hour and 15 minutes.

When I called for results, they would only say that I had failed- not what my score was, not where I was strong and where I wasn't. The questions and problems were on the level that a 12 year old could answer.

Can you say, "federal watch list?"

Guess they don't want dedicated, intelligent employees- just obedient monkeys.

By the way, I am currently employed in an aerospace project involving one of the Pentagon's largest contractors and a weapons system familiar to all. The acronym is meant to be clever, but among the contractors, the job is known as "Operation Clusterfuck."

If private concerns operated like this, we would all be living out of teepees and eating jerky. Maybe not such a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
95. whoa, wait a minute, we can't be havin' democracy in the democratic party
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC