Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Need to Kill GERRYMANDERING - But we can't call it "gerrymandering"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:06 PM
Original message
We Need to Kill GERRYMANDERING - But we can't call it "gerrymandering"
We absolutely have to target gerrymandering. It's not good for either party b/c it makes the ruling party complacent and prone to calcification over long periods of time. Plus, it's biting us in the ass b/c there's virtually no way to get the House until 2012.

The thing is though that "redistricting reform" or even "ending gerrymandering" is too much Washington-speak. We should call it "incumbent protection" or "politician-protection."

Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't see anything wrong with the term "gerrymandering"
It is far less bureaucratic sounding than "incumbent protection".

But you're absolutely right that we have to eliminate it. Gerrymandering => Instead of voters choosing politicians, politicians choose the voters.

:grr:

Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Right. The politicians get to draw their own districts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. i say call it gerrymandering, or...
vote rigging, which is also what it is, and also easy, sound-bitey, and pretty accurate (albeit broad).

maybe just "vote rigging by redrawing the lines."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiedye Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about Redistricting
That is a more intuitive word for it.
Gerrymandering has no roots that pop out immediately. Redistricting sounds like what it is. And its ok with the spell check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're not gonna get Americans riled up about "Redistricting"
You need something like "tax relief" which Republicans use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Re-districting is not the same as gerrymandering
Iowa "redistricts" -- it uses a non-partisan panel to draw fair and competitive district boundaries. "Redistricting" is not an inherently negative process or word.

Tom DeLay "gerrymanders" -- drawing highly partisan, convoluted districts meant to ensure the victory of certain candidates. "Gerrymandering" is a great word to describe this process, as it is accurate, has the appropriate pejorative connotation, and is well known and understood.

Even if we are successful at eliminating gerrymandering, redistricting will still be necessary, due to population shifts etc.

--Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Drawing outside the lines? Redrawing the map?
Redistricting (which I personally vote for)
District Rigging
District Tampering
District Engineering
District Arranging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montieg Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm a victim of this process
this election. Delay and his henchmen in Texas-- Tom Craddick and Rick Perry-- shoved it in us---cold end first so you burn your hand pulling it out. My Rep--Stenholm-- was redistricted into a Repub district and my county wound up with Bush's ex-business partner, who just as a Freshman got named assistant whip (who you know?), elected with only perfunctory opposition.
In tribute to this heavy-handed slamming, we call it(remember Rick Perry?)
you ready for this?
PERRYMANDERING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio-Active Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I like Jerry Mander
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Interesting Aside
I heard Joe Scarborough (yes, he's a right wing repuke, etc.--just stay with me) talk a bit about how the Republicans would pull it off. They'd go into a state with say, two Democratic districts, produce a new map that would result in only one Democratic district, but that district would be a majority black district. They would then approach prominant African American politicians in the state and say, look, support this plan and you can end up having a guaranteed House seat for life. Shop around long enough and eventually they find a taker to support the plan making it a "bipartisan" and "minority pleasing".

Ironically even he thinks its just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC