Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: Armitage defends ‘lightning rod’ Rumsfeld..."it must be hard"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 08:34 PM
Original message
MSNBC: Armitage defends ‘lightning rod’ Rumsfeld..."it must be hard"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6738873/

Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld “is a bit of a lightning rod these days” and suggested in an interview with NBC News that for the embattled secretary of defense, “it must be hard to get up and go to work.”

Armitage, who spoke with NBC News' Campbell Brown on Monday, admits he was “surprised” by Rumsfeld's response to a National Guardsman's concerns about U.S. military armor. Armitage defended both Rumsfeld and the soldier.

Speaking of the growing chorus of bipartisan congressional complaints about Rumsfeld, Armitage said, “I think they have a lot of questions, and they have their important questions and they deserve to be answered, and the secretary of defense is going to try and answer them.”

Armitage admitted he was “very surprised” by a question from a Tennessee National Guardsman who wanted more information about the lack of armor. “I was very surprised that the soldier didn't have the armor, and I was very surprised at the answer,” he said. “I think I question what our leaders in the field, the officers who are preparing to lead these men into battle, have been doing if they're going into battle without the equipment that they need then someone should be talking about it,” Armitage said. “The president of the United States has made it very clear, our soldiers are going to get what they need to do the job that we ask of them.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. You'd think they would tire of making excuses
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. The only bad thing about "Rummy under siege" is
it gives president assface a scapegoat, when it's his stupid fault that we invaded Iraq in the 1st place resulting in the predictable disaster that we have now. What is anyone who replaces Rummy honestly going to do to dramatically affect our Iraq policy? - Keep in mind Rummy's replacement will not be someone that will do things right, it will be someone that bush nominates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC