Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, how the hell did Bush ever get the reputation of being a Christian?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:29 PM
Original message
So, how the hell did Bush ever get the reputation of being a Christian?
Just because he says he is? He sure doesn't act like one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's about it
and repeated it til it became an accepted fact, lie or not. That's what they do for everything they don't let something like truth stand in the way of the message they want out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're watching Fox! "We..are...watching..fox..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. What I'd love to know is how GWBush can call himself a
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 10:41 PM by TaleWgnDg
Methodist when his own church stated that he does not espouse Methodist tenets/teachings/beliefs . . . ?
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1020-02.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32946


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"And the religious people (GWBush) was connected
with in Texas aren't anything like the mainstream
— even the mainstream in Texas." — Molly Ivins,
political pundit, on GWBush as Governor of Texas.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. thanks for the links
but Tooley misses the point:

"Bush is supposedly a bad Christian and a bad Methodist because, like most Methodists, he does not agree with these church officials in their equation of compassion with a large federal welfare state and in their opposition to a strong military defense for America," Tooley said. "These United Methodist officials are effectively telling the president he is not a good Christian because his policies do not match their own left-wing beliefs."

Bush is not necessarily a bad Christian because of his policies, but he is definitely a bad Christian because of the LIES he tells about his policies. However, Tooley must also be aware that the Methodist church does officially support some "left-wing beliefs"

" There are many ways Bush seems to defy the Methodist book of discipline. In its "social principles" the book of discipline calls for stewardship of the environment:
"Furthermore, we recognize the responsibility of the church toward lifestyle and systemic changes in society that will promote a more ecologically just world and a better quality of life for all creation." #64 p. 85
and energy conservation:
"Further, we urge the wholehearted support of the conservation of energy and responsible development of renewable energy sources, that the goodness of the earth may be affirmed." #64B p. 86
Also, unlike Bush, the Methodist church supports affirmative action:
"We support affirmative action as one method of addressing the inequalities and discriminatory practices within our Church and society." #66A p. 92
The Methodist church also supports universal health care:
"Health care is a basic human right." #66Q p. 97
The Methodist church also opposes Bush's fiscal policies:
"Therefore, we recognize the responsibility of governments to develop and implement sound fiscal and monetary policies that provide for the economic life of individuals and corporate entities and that ensure full employment and adequate incomes with a minimum of inflation... We support measures that would reduce the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few." #67 p. 98
Bush's policies of giving tax breaks to rich people and non-working investors has been ineffective at creating jobs and more effective at increasing the concentration of wealth.
The Methodist book of discipline calls for the government to create jobs:
"Every person has the right to a job at a living wage. Where the private sector cannot or does not provide jobs for all, it is the responsibility of government to provide for the creation of such jobs." #67C p.99 Yet Bush has been cutting government spending and services at the Federal level. The Senate Democrats added aid to the states to the 2003 tax cuts, but that aid has not been sufficient to keep states, cities, and school boards from cutting jobs and services. Bush is counting on the private sector to create jobs, and as the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) shows - the private sector has not been creating jobs. At least not in this country.
Then there is the matter of the "war on Terror" and the un-related war in Iraq. Bush has advanced a "doctrine of pre-emption" which makes war the first resort at the very insinuation of a threat. By its own logic every country in the world should attack the United States in order to pre-empt our possible future attack upon them. On the other hand the Methodist church opposes war, violence, and lawlessness:
"We therefore urge the establishment of the rule of law in international affairs as a means of elimination of war, violence, and coercion in these affairs." #68G p. 103
A good Methodist "...is called upon to be a witness for Christ in the world, a light and leaven in society, and a reconciler in a culture of conflict. Each member is to identify with the agony and suffering of the world and to radiate and exemplify the Christ of hope." #220 p. 124
Of course, it is hard to tell what that means exactly, except it is fairly clear that George W. Bush has not been a reconciler as President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not Jesus lover, King David lover!
Christians worship Jesus, there's no way Bush follows the teachings of Jesus. Bush and most repugs are followers of Judaism, and the Old Testament. They are actually Jews in a weird way. (me not racist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. no WAY are you fobbing him off on us!
his actions and words bear no resemblance to judaism.
there is more to judaism than selective exerpts from the torah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. But there is a point there...
...these fundies follow far more Old Testament than New (and when they do, it's usually Paul and not Jesus they're citing).

So what, besides the obvious, can we call 'em?

I agree, the Jews shouldn't have to shoulder this burden, too. They've done their share and then some over the centuries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. but they don't follow much of the torah either
which, for instance, includes 633 commandments. they boast about 10 of them, and can't even abide by those. e.g., killing, coveting, graven images, adultery, just to name a few.

exerpting a few lines from the torah no more makes them jewish than exerpting a few lines out of constitution makes them law abiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. We really should start calling them "Paulists," (no one has a problem
with Lutherans); and while we are ati it, let's find out where they get those Holy Bibles that conveniently leave out the Book of Matthew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. Lutherans
What did you mean by this. I'm looking at the Lutheran Church and wondering what you're saying here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. I mean no harm--it's as if they (Paulist)are another sect of Christianity.
I'm a Presbyterian, etc.

OTOH, that is indeed unfair to Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. I agree
I was raised Catholic. Are you saying that Lutherans are more "Paulist" than other denominations? Are Presbyterians less so? I'm curious because I think I'm anti-Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. No--I'm speaking of terminology only.
I'm really not questioning anyone.

It was an analogy, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
44. Actually, They're Levitical Paulists.....or, as I prefer Pharisees.
concerned with the law instead of forgiveness....but that's unfair to Paul, as well.

the point is, these are NOT religiously righteous people, these are people PRETENDING to be religious, so comparing them to true religious figures is an unfair comparison from the get go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crasmane Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
41. Bush's type would have no trouble with the law,
but immense trouble with the prophets.
Put GW Bush in a room with Ezekiel, Hosea & Isiah and he'd choose to never open his mouth again as long as he lived.
The prophets were sent here to put people straight not through law, but through awareness of compassion. They were sent to wake up people's hearts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. As in King David and Batsheba? Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mslux Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Old Testament followers?
Please explain yourself. To say bushco are Jews is a severe insult to Jews. But then again, making the link between the repugs and Christianity insults Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellybelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. the repugs...
Edited on Tue Dec-21-04 01:59 AM by jellybelly
They aren't 'jews' as we know. The 'eye for an eye' is one example of judaism that repugs follow. They never quote Jesus. They are followers of ANCIENT Judaism, and the real Jews of today follow more of Jesus' teachings than actual so-called Christians. I didn't mean to offend anyone. I'm surprised nobody thought about this already.

and I also don't believe there are actual Jews anymore, (descendants from the Hebrew race). The Hebrews are non-existant now. People who are jewish technically aren't since being a jew means you are a hebrew. So when racists classify all jews as being a race I get really confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. The antics of the W.rong regime insults anyone with a moral compass,
regardless of their belief system (or doubt, or lack thereof).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
36. Better said "Old Testament God"
That god liked wars and told them ravage pillage and plunder. He hated homosexual men and liked smiting and so on.

People talk about the Koran being violent...I ask if they ever read the Old Testament!

But Jesus...Bush is no fan or follower of his teaching...and from what Jesus had to say about the Pharisees he'd have been no fan of Bush.

But...whatever Bush's issues...I don't see how "Christians" can see him as Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. No, they're not followers of Judaism
and neither are they followers of Jesus. They simply use religion to justify their evil deeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
43. um...King David was not a war monger.....
he wrote the psalms and was beloved by God for his peaceful nature. He avoided conflict whenever possible and was forced into war. He fought when it was absolutely necessary (goliath being one example against the philistines)

maybe you need a different old testament example?

If anything, Clinton is more like King David, for having the inability to resist carnal temptations (Bathsheba).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Acting Christian" has nothing to do with "Being Christian"
Simply saying that you're a Christian is the only qualifier necessary, from what I've seen.

Some of the most outspokenly Christian people I know are the most hatefeul, racist, selfish, materialistic, un-Christian people I've ever met.

Typically the Christians who actually act Christian are the ones who don't go around talking about how Christian they are. At least that's been my experience with my friends and family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,'...
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter."

Matthew 7:21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. If that's true, I predict many freepers will be stunned
when they are turned away at the pearly gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. I slip with this, but I try to say "I like to believe I'm Christian," or
"I follow Christ."

I don't think it's up to me to decide that I am. It's a shorthand for my beliefs, but the proof is the practice. But I guess that's a "nuance," and the RadRights don't have time for such things.

Your last line is indicative of the biggest problem with these types of people--they haven't read Matthew, or their bizarre HB somehow left out an entire book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kedrys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. He started saying it, and the sheeple bought it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's also the Great Communicator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Republican spin machine keeps saying it
and the fundie churches keep promoting the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. I have no clue
:shrug: I certainly don't think he walks the walk
of the faithful .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackangrydem Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. During that famous debate during the 2000 GOP primaries
he said he favorite philosopher was Jesus Christ, then when pressed on it went on to say that he accepted him as his personal savior and it helped him change his life.

Although he caught a lot of flak from the media the fundies ate it up and haved loved him ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. I remember, and UI wished at the time he would have been pressed
on it, but he wasn't.

OTOH, W.rong's "followers" wouldn't have been able to nuance Jesus' position on Iraq, poverty, hatred, either, so it would have been worthless for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. I was certain he gave that answer
because he didn't know any philosophers.

And for certain he doesn't follow the philosophy of Jesus...it's like he thinks what would Jesus do and then does the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Anyone can do it.
Edited on Tue Dec-21-04 12:19 AM by gulliver
That's the big problem with Christianity right now. There is no security, no authentication, no credential, no set of qualifications. Drape a cross on your neck, put a fish on your car, go to a church every so often, you're a Christian. And no one can say you aren't ... even if, like Bush, you aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. My brother (who is a recovering Fundie) says he has a personal testimony
of his acceptance of Christ posted somewhere and apparently that's all it took.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackangrydem Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Genuine acceptance of Jesus as your personal savior
IS all takes to be a Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. If it is genuine, it should show some fruit
Luke 6:45
However, there is a large strain of fundie "Christianity" with some set beliefs -
1) anti-tax and anti-social programs
2) anti-choice
3) pro- death penalty
4) anti separation of church and state
a) school vouchers
b) faith based social programs
c) abstinence education and "under god" Pledge
5) anti-gay
6) he says he prays and studies the Bible daily and goes to church weekly
7) anti-Islam and pro-Zionist

Bush falls in line with that, and Kerry did not, so his Catholicism was questioned. Bush would likely test as a Christian at www.worldviewweekend.com whereas I tested as a secular and a commie on economic issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Now, they wouldn't try to deliberately skew the test, would they?
I can imagine even Dr. King and Bishop Tutu, maybe even the Pope would be godless commies in their book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. But the fruit of the Spirit
is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.
GAL 5:22,23

Wonder if right wingers...know any of that

I am looking at that list...and the only one might fit Bush is faithfulness...but not on spirit. But they do seem faithful to a neo-con sort of vision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. relentless PR
claiming that he is

about a thousand "halo" pictures in the media

A few hundred bought-and-paid-for conmen christian preachers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. You know, Christians as a group, are the worst judge
of character. Think of all these people who are big-time, famous Christian leaders, and most of them are so obviously rotten it makes you wonder how their followers can be so blind. Especially when Jesus tells his followers to judge leaders "by their fruit" -- that is, by the things they DO, not what they say. But, unfortunately, it seems like all Bush or any other leader has to do is simply say, "I believe!" and millions will blindly follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. True that, judged by his "fruit," W.rong becomes a
miserable failure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. Good Propoganda knows no bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Biggo Doggo Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. A lot of DRY DRUNKS do this...
they grab onto something that makes them feel strength in the face of their overpowering addiction.
OVERPOWERING.
And when someone is denied what they are addicted to, don't they lash out? Don't they WANT the world to end? Wouldn't the Rapture, to an alkie who couldn't drink, seem like a literal Godsend?
BTW: why hasn't anybody talked about the twins needing an intervention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
29. Same as he got the false rep for being a cowboy on a ranch.
Public Relations firm, the same one poppa bush used, the same one that came up with the "incubator babies" lie in 1999 and the purple plastic "people shredder" in 2003, fixed bush up with "christianity" and his "ranch" right before the 2000 campaign.

And only rightwignnuts are big enough rubes to fall for the bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
39. The same way Hitler did (at least until he was so entrenched in power
he could afford to toss aside the Christians who believed he and his policies were "ordained by God")

The very same way. A self-referencing propaganda machine with the acpability to launder ANY lie into "conventional wisdom".

And, at the time, as the Bushevik Propaganda Machine is now, the Nazi Proaganda Machine was ALSO unprecedented in it's scope and power in Human History.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
42. It's the way he was packaged.
He ran for Governor after the Texas Republican party was taken over by far-Right "Christians". From the beginning, part of his attaction was--he's a "Godly" man.

There is a strain of Christianity that holds that you are either saved or not. Generally, those who do well in life are demonstrating that they are saved. "Doing well" is not the same as "doing good".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
46. it really isn't up to any of us to decide who is or is not a Christian
That is for God to decide. All we can really say is that he is not following any path that we recognize or that he missed some lessons along the way.

PS...... Paul wrote some of the most beautiful verse in the Bible. I hate to see the kind of internet, pop theology which dismisses Paul. What I know is that some of Paul is misinterpreted and picked apart to make his words a way to bash "sinners". He was only human and a man of his times. So he wasn't perfect, however he has a LOT to say which is valuable.

Bush is the kind of "Christian" who is looking very hard for validation through religion. There was a picture once of him praying and he had his face all scrunched up as if he were looking for Jesus behind his eyelids. He makes me think of several woman I have met in my life who joined the Seventh Day Adventist church after living chaotic lives being strippers and all the relationship nonsense and drinking etc.. that goes along with that life.

These are women who I met at two different times in my life. I have always thought it was interesting that they both joined the same fundamentalist, very paternalistic denomination as a way to start dealing with the chaos in their lives. I expect that both will someday leave that denimination and move on to some church which is more intelectual and open minded.

So Bush if he is genuinely trying to follow the Christian religion is very early in the process and is getting some really bad advice from some really bad theologians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wpbpete78 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
49. by giving,...
HOARDS of faith based tax dollars to wingnuts like robertson, fallwell and bob jones univ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC