Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: As Bush Vows to Halve Deficit, Targets Already Feel Squeezed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 11:00 AM
Original message
WSJ: As Bush Vows to Halve Deficit, Targets Already Feel Squeezed
The Wall Street Journal

December 21, 2004

PAGE ONE

Sharpening the Knife

As Bush Vows to Halve Deficit, Targets Already Feel Squeezed

Less Budget Funding for Aid, Education, Cities, Science; Bracing for the Boomers

Republican Governors Resist

By JACKIE CALMES
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
December 21, 2004; Page A1

WASHINGTON -- In his first term, President Bush's domestic policy focused on creating winners, through tax cuts, a new prescription-drug-benefits plan for seniors, large farm subsidies, big homeland-security contracts and increased spending for education, scientific research and more. Now, with worries about the size of the deficit widespread, get ready for a second Bush term about identifying losers.

(snip)

With guns -- or military spending -- growing, the butter is likely to include some of the most visible areas of domestic spending, including the Medicaid health program, subsidies to Amtrak, agricultural research and even some federal education programs. In the just-finished fiscal 2005 budget, which came in 10 weeks late, big cities received less federal aid to comply with anti-pollution laws and job training requirements. The National Science Foundation, which underwrites the country's basic research saw its funding cut from 2004 levels. Funding for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration came in below Mr. Bush's request, despite House Majority Leader Tom DeLay delaying a vote to get more money for the space program, which has major installations in his district. Even spending on the president's own initiatives for education, health research and the promotion of economic and political change overseas were cut to levels below his requests or last year's spending. A similar fate befell Laura Bush's program to sponsor cultural events in local communities.

(snip)

California's Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeb Bush in Florida and George Pataki in New York, among others, will likely resist attempts to shift the funding of major programs, such as Medicaid, to the states. Of the 38 governorships up for grabs in 2006, 22 are now held by Republicans. "All the Republican governors were pretty reserved because they wanted Bush to get re-elected," says former Republican Rep. Vin Weber. "But they're not going to keep quiet now." The Republicans who control Congress will also fight to avoid deep cuts in popular programs and to maintain their ability to bring home funds for local projects. So difficult were this year's choices that Congress's initial cuts weren't deep enough to bring the budget within pre-set limits. In the end, lawmakers opted to cut all programs across the board. They even put off a highway-construction bill -- a surefire way for Congressmen to find money for their states -- until next year.

(snip)

In fiscal 2004, which ended Sept. 30, the U.S. registered its biggest-ever deficit in dollar terms: $412 billion. At 3.6% of gross domestic product, that deficit was proportionally smaller than those of the mid-1980s, which surpassed 5% of GDP. With economic growth, good weather, stricter spending discipline and a favorable turn in Iraq, the 2005 deficit could shrink. But the imminent retirement of the baby boomers and the inexorable rise in health-care costs makes the question of government spending more pressing. Tax revenues now represent 16% of GDP, the smallest since 1959. Government outlays are at nearly 20%. By 2008, Mr. Bush's final year in office, the oldest of the baby boomers will qualify for early Social Security benefits. That sets in motion a demographic tidal wave that will overwhelm that program -- as well as Medicare and Medicaid -- unless they're changed.

(snip)

The president campaigned for re-election on a promise to cut the deficit in half by the time he leaves office... But finding areas to cut isn't easy. Of the government's $2.3 trillion spending this year, about 85% is almost untouchable by public consensus. About 20% of the total goes toward defense. Spending in that area has increased 55% on Mr. Bush's watch. The war and reconstruction efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan are running about $5 billion a month, congressional analysts say. Mr. Bush has also embarked on ambitious plans to modernize the armed forces through the use of advanced technology.

Cutting Social Security benefits, which represent another fifth of the budget, is also off-limits -- for now. An additional fifth is spent on Medicare and Medicaid health-insurance programs. A thinner slice goes to unemployment compensation, farm subsidies and other benefit programs. Interest on the nation's borrowing is a big and growing budget item, one that cannot be cut except by slashing the debt itself. The $168 billion in annual payments, much of it to overseas holders of Treasury bonds, represents just over 7% of the federal spending. That's more than the government will spend on education, housing, transportation, science, space and technology combined. The remaining discretionary funds -- and the area Mr. Bush has targeted for shrinking -- cover much of what many Americans typically think of as government work, including breast-cancer research, aid to rural and inner-city schools, veterans' medical care, weather forecasting and park rangers. These annually appropriated activities accounted for about 18% of the federal budget in fiscal 2004.

(snip)


--David Rogers contributed to this article.

Write to Jackie Calmes at jackie.calmes@wsj.com

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110358880813305443,00.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freedom_to_read Donating Member (623 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. so...
"With economic growth, good weather, stricter spending discipline and a favorable turn in Iraq, the 2005 deficit could shrink."

that's a lot of contingencies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, we are at Stage Nine . . .
The Republican's Sinister Secret Plan

http://fixco1.com/bushplan.html

snip...

Stage nine, this is the approaching critical stage, is to bankrupt the federal and state governments so that their assets can be acquired for pennies on the dollar.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Permanant tax cuts to the estate holders and corporations
Cuts in benefits and huge deficits for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Prime rate just went up a quarter point....as a precursor
How does climbing interest rates figure into Bush*'s cutting the deficit? They will continue to climb for the next four years and who ever becomes President after Bush* will have quite the job cleaning up the mess. Of course they will get the blame and the Bush* Cabal will escape with the loot and laugh at America until their death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC