Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vietraq and Iraqnam.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 02:52 PM
Original message
Vietraq and Iraqnam.
"But with Joe Six-Pack the war was never more popular. In January 1965, a Harris poll showed that 59 per cent of Americans were cool on the Administration's commitment to Vietnam. By summer, a solid two-thirds majority of Americans supported the war. 'There's too much involved for us to back out now,' said a 29-year-old labourer from Greensboro, Indiana. 'We have to finish the job.'

Sound familiar to you, too?

Or how about this:

"Not only were the Americans fighting an unseen enemy in Vietnam, they were also fighting an unknown quantity. No-one could ever accurately estimate the number of North Vietnamese combat forces who were assisting the Viet Cong in their struggle, nor how many more were being prepared for future action."

"The hospital at Thai Binh, near Hanoi, was bombed three times by the Americans. In 1967, it was estimated that 80 per cent of the North Vietnamese casualties were civilian."

This from a chapter written by a Vietnamese fellow who joined the Viet Cong at aged 16:

"It was things they did like offering us what we did not want and rebuilding something they had destroyed in the first place that showed how simple minded the Americans were. As if we could forget what they had done so easily. They could be generous to us if they wished but at the same time they could destroy whole villages and kill so many so quickly."

"The Americans were well armed but slow and clumsy. They had firepower that we feared so we stayed hidden and out of range. They were like elephants, especially when moving through the jungle ... If we wounded or killed only one of theirs and lived to fight another day, it was a victory. Like the drop of water that wears away the stone, we would wear away the American Army."

Sounds exactly like Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like common sense something we americans seem to lack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Lynn here is more fuel for the fire....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was in Vietnam '64-'66
and it was much the same as Iraq was a year ago. We were only there to train the South Vietnamese Army to fight there own battles then we'd pull out. Right now Iraq is looking much the same as Vietnam in 1967 when we realized SVA was full of corruption and really didn't care about defending what the US thought was best for their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. yes, it does
and bushco, media , corporations, religious right are very strong forces . i feel that the fanaticism in the US is much stronger than in the 60s and the GOP will use 9/11 as its instrument to govern by fear.

in the 60s i was optimistic. in these times, i am not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Iraq is probably worse
Considering that the cold war is over our reasons for going into Iraq are even less defensible. Also the Iraq lies started immediately whereas the Vietnam propaganda machine took a while to gear up.

What's weird is that it seems like the bigger the lies, the easier it is to manufacture the false consciousness necessary to put them over on huge numbers if not majorities of voters. Kerry for example had to struggle to find ways of telling the truth whereas Bush had no trouble selling total fabrications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC