Paragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 08:49 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 08:57 AM by Paragon
The winner: Kucinich 1% Clark 0% http://www.cnn.com/
|
Killarney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |
1. That's sad considering Kucinich campaigned in Iowa and Clark didn't. |
Jerseycoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Except Clark didn't run in Iowa |
|
Is this supposed to mean something?
|
Paragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I know that, of course. |
|
I just like hearing you guys say it.
What, has the Wes Clark "phenomenon" been banned from the Iowa airwaves? Ralph Nader visited all 50 states when he campaigned last -- what's Clark's and Lieberman's excuse?
|
thalerd
(28 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Clark entered way too late to go to Iowa. It's a gamble, and it will either pay off or it won't.
John McCain skipped Iowa and still did very well. Bill Clinton skipped Iowa and won the election. Judging by Clark's poll numbers around the nation, he's not in bad shape to compete.
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. It means that he did almost as well as DK without lifting a finger |
|
Clark's campaign is nothing to be sneezed at.
|
Paragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
Frederic Bastiat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message |
3. He also beat Sharpton, who actually participated in Iowa |
|
BTW, those results are for only about 20% of precincts. CNN has complete results on thier website.
And I am glad that Al Sharpton's race-baiting was rewarded with a big fat goose egg.
|
Paragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. You're right - I'll correct it. |
Democrats unite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I hope this makes you feel better... |
|
God only knows Dean supporters need need it after last night.
|
Paragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Did saying that make YOU feel better? Let me know when you grow a sense of humor.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He's a good guy and I like him.
|
sabbat hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
but with either Kucinich's 1% or Clark's 0% or for that matter Gephardt's 11% it gets them 0 delegates from Iowa at the Democratic national convention.
peace david :hippie:
|
youngred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Footage at 11!
was this really necessary?
|
funky_bug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If you insist on playing the poll game, I'll put on my defensive armor and note this:
Distance from Dean to Kerry - 18.3
Distance from Clark to Dean - 17.8
Looks like Clark's being in NH hurt him about as much as Dean's being in Iowa.
(damn... reactionary and harsh... but it's hard to stay above the fray when we keep getting drug through the mud.)
|
Mattforclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-20-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He beat Lieberman too, and that is a very good thing indeed.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 03:06 AM
Response to Original message |