Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why is it wrong for liberal Democrats to advance their goals?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:17 PM
Original message
why is it wrong for liberal Democrats to advance their goals?
peace
economic and judicial fairness
support for the most vulnerable among us
human and civil rights
protection of the environment

Pure fringe insanity, I know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who said it was wrong?
the MSM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. ok, I know I should know
but what does "MSM" stand for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. MSM = main stream media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because resistance is futile. We must be assimilated.

Everyone seems to concede that the Borg-licans are all-powerful.

Where's Captain Picard when we need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah - the beatitudes
The nerve!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. "But if by a "Liberal" ...
But if by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people -- their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties -- someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal," then I'm proud to say I'm a 'Liberal.'
-------------------------------------------------------JFK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. what's wrong
is the idea of running out of party everyone who disagrees on anything. That is what is wrong. And I don't mean anything on your list. I mean any vote on any bill or any tactic to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. how about a straight answer to my question?
Who said anything about running anyone out of the party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. there is a lot of it here
but I agree with everything on your list. They signify a lot of why I got involved in politics from the time I was 12 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. perhaps I've misjudged
(wouldn't be the first time) but you've seemed to me to be quite the moderate. How is it then that you could support such a radical agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I'm a liberal pragmatist
I've supported such things my entire life. I became a Democrat because of my belief that the Democrats cared more about civil rights and economic justice.

My first job out of college was working for the AFL-CIO. I also worked for the American Federation of Teachers. I've worked on a lot of campaigns for both liberal and moderate Democrats. I think we need to have a big tent. Democrats that win in New York aren't necessarily able to win in Colorado.

I believe the party needs to return to economic populism to win. We need to run a campaign to bring economic hope to all Americans and remind people how they are getting screwed by those in power. This is some of what I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I disagree with none of this.
I'm not sure what the problem is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. That's what I was thinking about your thread.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. the division wasn't of my making. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. What division?
Can you be more specific?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I want answers, dammit!
Straight answers! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. the division
between progressives and centrists, oh impatient one. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Who said that you were responsible for
the division between progressives and centrists? Who do they think you are, Karl Rove?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. no one.
It's a topic to be addressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. We have a liberal form of government.
We have a liberal society.

In reality, we're all liberal, (except for the fascists).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. tell it to Al From. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Hey, Al From!
We have a liberal form of government.

We have a liberal society.

In reality, we're all liberal, (except for the fascists).

Beeatch.

(How was that?)B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. great!
If he reads DU then I'm a hat, but that was great nonetheless. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. He should read DU.
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 10:51 PM by VioletLake
And borrow some of our ideas. The RW does it.

Add: Actually, the RW just steals them and twists them to suit their nefarious aims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. no problem with this thread
my only problem is with some other people and their treatment of some Democrats. I suspect we actually agree on most things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Its not wrong unless you are a republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StephanieMarie Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. You forgot "A Living Wage"
At minimum wage, a worker would have to work over 80 hours per week to afford an AVERAGE two bedroom apartment in this country. That's just WRONG! Where is Clinton when we need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I did.
Good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I think
that's part of economic justice. We need a living wage, not a minimum wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. I smell flame bait
Most people who are on the left in the US support these issues. It's just that when it comes to things such as gay marriage and abortion, we are divided, and that's what the Repubs use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. no, not flame bait.
And I include gay marriage and reproductive choice under civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. They are great goals but need real & strong people to back them up
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 09:49 PM by GetTheRightVote
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why do you ask?
Is someone trying to convince you that it's wrong? I hope not. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. Clarence Thomas Would Probalby Support Every Thing On Your List...
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 09:51 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
I doubt Clarence would say he's for

war


economic and judicial unfairness

lack of support for the most vulnerable among us

the infringement of human and and civil rights

decimation of the environment...

but I am sure you and Clarence have different notions of what those things mean....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. words mean things.
Our friend Clarence might well indeed wish to pass himself off as a progressive on these topics, but...he isn't.

You know what I mean. I know what I mean. Clarence knows what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. of course...
but you are referring to broad goals not specific policies....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. the goals give birth to the policies.
Details, devils, etc. If the language has any meaning left at all, Clarence doesn't get to appropriate the goals I outlined without being laughed out of the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. take one
"support for the most vulnerable among us"

That means different things to different people...


RFK said what a struggling person wants most is a job and some hope...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I don't think that, to people who genuinely mean it,
"support for the most vulnerable among us" means such a divergent set of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. silly pinko
hegemony, greed, social darwinism, manifest destiny, racial and cultural purity and overuse of natural resources are the true goals of this country.

Were you asleep during the indoctrination sessions? Now go buy something you can't afford to atone for your idealism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. *whimper*
*slink*

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC