Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean discusses Instant Runoff Voting.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:13 PM
Original message
Dean discusses Instant Runoff Voting.
In his latest book, "You Have the Power", he tells about his choice of voting methods. I have never fully understood IRV, and he does a good job here.
Just short snips, or you won't buy the book.

SNIP..."Had we used instant runoff voting in 2000, most Nader supporters would have gone to the polls and voted for Ralph Nader first and Al Gore second. Since Nader.....wouldn't have finished in one of the top two slots, Al Gore would have been the beneficiary of roughly 60% of his (Nader's) votes....(Most of Pat Buchanan's votes would have gone to President Bush.}" END SNIP

This is interesting. In Florida in 2000 Nader got 97,488 votes and Buchanan got 17,488 votes, many of which were from the Jewish community in South Florida, which were very suspect on Theresa's butterfly ballots.

He further says IRV would "encourage candidates to hold a firm set of principles without worrying that their beliefs could make them unviable. It would allow people to vote for candidates they really want......thereby increasing both enthusiasm and turnout."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
toymachines Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. thats one of the best ideas i have ever heard
too bad that would never happen because i could see that definetly favoring the liberals. and oh boy the repugs wouldnt like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe they already do this in some California municipal elections
one of the interesting side effects, candidates joining together for fund raisers or events.

Rather than sling mud, candidates would get together to host events. They try to present themselves as good alternate choices for each others' core voters. "Even if you're voting for my opponent, consider me for your second choice"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. San Fran? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Much much more here
Edited on Wed Dec-29-04 02:35 PM by BlueEyedSon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC