Badger1
(517 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 01:48 PM
Original message |
Feingold for president website |
|
It's already begun kids. www.draftruss.org
|
coreystone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Tell Russ to get into contact with Congressman Conyers... |
|
he might need some help. Maybe, he would care to 'GIVE' some!
|
iamjoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The Most Important Question |
|
What was he doing during Vietnam? Why didn't he go?
(Not that I care, but it will be an issue)
|
hopein08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
He, like Edwards, was born in 1953. (Feingold in March, Edwards in June). I remember reading that Edwards just missed it because they ended the draft a matter of months before he turned 18 so maybe Feingold got the same luck. It makes sense to me since Feingold graduated from the University of Wisconsin in 1975 so he would have graduated high school in '71 (and been 18).
(Correct me if I'm wrong.)
|
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Well, how old was Kennedy when he ran? |
|
It's a little early to be planning 2008, but Feingold would be a great candidate.
|
hopein08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Kennedy turned 43 in 1960... |
|
Sorry it took so long to answer, but the holiday kept me away.
Anyway, I was saying that Feingold was too young to serve in Vietnam in response to the previous post, not to be president in 2008. Is that why you asked about Kennedy?
In relation to that, I remember that one of Kerry's answers to a question about Edwards' youth and inexperience was that, at 51, Edwards was eight years older than Kennedy had been when he was inaugurated.
|
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Sorry--I misunderstood. |
|
Anyway, Feingold would be a great candidate.
|
CatholicEdHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. What are is overall strong points |
|
Besides Vietnam, that is what Rove goes for. How could he turn the positives into precieved negatives?
|
latteromden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
25. The miraculous "positive that, in Republican hands, becomes a negative" |
|
is McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform.
|
Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. It didn't matter for Bush or Clinton. |
OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. why bother? . . . they're not going to let him or any Democrat win . . . |
|
they'll just do what they did in 2004 . . . and in 2002 . . . and in 2000 . . . whomever the Repugs run in 2008, you can rest assured that the fix is already in . . .
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thanks for the good cheer and positive vibes |
|
The doomsday posts about fraud on every thread about every topic is getting seriously old. We already know about the fraud problem and making everyone depressed doesn't help.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
6. In '04 I was hoping for a midwestern - southern populist ticket |
|
Maybe we can do that in '08. Feingold sounds like a great candidate and I'll bet he could win if he ran with a progressive from the South. Putting Durbin or Feingold on a ticket with Edwards would surely be a winner.
|
hopein08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. I would love a Feingold & Edwards ticket in 2008... |
|
in either order! That would really make it clear what the Democratic party should stand for and be about. I would work so hard for that ticket and vote for it in a second!
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. I would work very hard for that ticket too |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-02-05 02:23 PM by Radical Activist
and in either order. I wonder what the likelyhood is of someone being chosen and being willing to run for Vice-President a second time after losing the first.
I like Durbin even better than Feingold but I'm still learning more about Feingold. I doubt Durbin has any interest in running but I wish he would. I always liked him but I found out just how much courage he has when he and Wellstone were the only Democrats running for re-election that voted against the war in Iraq.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-31-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
10. If he wants my vote, he'll have to contest the election on Thursday. |
|
He'll also have to change his position on Yucca Mountain. If he does that, I'll be happy.
|
madison2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. Agreed. If he does that, he's won me over. |
|
Better candidate than Kerry or Edwards IMHO.
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Love It! Fiengold is a wonderful choice! imo, nt |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Fiengold said "no" to the Patriot Act all ALONE!!! |
|
He was the only member of the United States Senate to vote against the USA PATRIOT Act.
|
Rageneau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
22. But didn't he bend over for Ashcroft? |
|
I remember being furious at Feingold when he refused to oppose the confirmation of Ashcroft as AG. At the time, I believe he said something about 'giving the prez the cabinet he wants.'
Which is crap.
Ashcroft (and other RW appointees) should have been opposed (on account of idealogy) by ALL Dem senators, including Russ. They knew what Ashcroft would be like; I sure as hell did. Yes, the Patriot Act should have been universally opposed, too, and so should the Iraq 'war' resolution, and the tax rip-off, etc.
IMHO, any Democrat who did not fervently oppose ALL of those is not worth supporting as a national leader.
We don't need Democratic leaders who sometimes make it easier for the Rethugs to screw the rest of us.
We need champions, not chumps.
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. He did, out of principle, nt |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Fiengold said "No" to the war in Iraq! nt |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-02-05 05:22 PM by usregimechange
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
20. McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform. nt |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Fiengold says "no" to con. pay raises, returns them to the DT. nt |
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-02-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message |