Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems need to Focus on Election Reform, not Filibustering

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 01:42 AM
Original message
Dems need to Focus on Election Reform, not Filibustering
To tell the truth, I am so disgusted with this election I don't care who gets appointed to the Supreme Court. I don't care if the filibustering rules are changed. I don't care who has the upper hand when it comes to "moral values." I don't care about anything but election reform.

Dems don't even have to use the word fraud (although one of the reasons I am so disgusted is because they are too f-ckn chickenshit to speak the word aloud.) I swear to god, if no one joins Conyers in his call for an inquiry into the Ohio election, it will be very difficult for me to support the Democratic Party ever again. I've put my State Representatives on notice that this is their chance to redeem themselves from the 2000 debacle, and they better not blow it this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sorry, but the courts do matter. The dems must dig in.
Election reform is important, but we thought we had it after 2000 and we didn't. It only got worse. Whatever McCain-Feingold was supposed to reform didn't work either. Any reform will just be circumvented.

The dems must filibuster and do whatever they have to in order to prevent a more right wing supreme court. We're all doomed if that happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. You Will Care
When the Court is packed with Scalia-clones for the next thirty years,
and everything that liberals worked for in the past century is lost.
When the freedoms enumerated in the first amendment are but fond memories.
When the Bill of Rights is replaced by the dictates of a state religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. NO! learn from GOP
Attack on ALL fronts.

Political capital is not finite and non-renewable.

If you fight for a just cause, you'll get more.
If you win on ANY issue by standing your ground you get a lot more.

The right isn't choosing their battles, they're fighting every one, and when they are defeated, they come back and hit the same issue AGAIN, even more ferociously.

Wouldn't it be great if we had a party that did that to defend the middle class, democracy, and a foreign policy that ISN'T the bitch of oil companies, sweatshop owners, and plantation owners?

We have to get our representatives to be impolite, to stand their ground, and not apologize for the New Deal that let most of us into the middle class.

If a representative or senator is unwilling to do that, they need to get the fuck out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Dems need to fight on all fronts
to keep from being steam-rolled, but they need to do one more thing. Open up new fronts and put the Pugs on the defensive. Find their weak spots and hit them hard on everything so they have to defend themselves. The Pugs are so one or two issue oriented in order to stay on message that if the Dems would use a shotgun loaded with birdshot it might just keep them off kilter.

Dems are better at going all directions and they should use it to their advantage. We don't need a "message" our actions speak for us in the form of social programs for people.

Filibuster any and all appointments, fight the torture stuff, the ethics, the social security, the lack of armor, the 9/11 report that was supposed to be released, the CIA report on pre-war intelligence that was supposed to be release, and there are many more fronts to open up. Nail the Pugs asses to the wall and keep them there. Put them on the defense. Get them off message.

Remember when (I think) it was Clarke who came out with his book? Condi, Powell, and all the rest got on talk shows immediately and proceeded to contradict each other because they tried to stay on message with lies...it can't be done.

They've told so many lies about so many things, the Dems can start nailing them on their lies and throw them off message once again. Dems have got to start being super aggressive it's the only way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. tsunami example
The tsunami was an example of something that got in the news cycle that they didn't start, and Bush's initial (and arguably current) response made him look like he didn't give a shit about brown people unless they're oil sheiks or on the board of an energy or defense corporation.

On a smaller scale, we saw this last year when in his state of the union address Bush said key provisions of the patriot act were set to expire, and dems applauded before he could say "which is why it needs to be renewed." Bush glared and shut up for a few seconds. He himself is especially poor at thinking on his feet.

If he makes it as far as the State of the Union this year, they need to do that if he mentions privatizing social security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep, we need an election system we can trust.
------------------------------------------------------
Election reform can save this country!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC