Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the U.N. run a U.S. AD blitz?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:08 PM
Original message
Should the U.N. run a U.S. AD blitz?
Edited on Sun Jan-02-05 09:08 PM by StClone
Wouldn't an ad campaign to illustrate the U.N. mission, successes and personalities help enlighten the mis-informed U.S. populace? All Americans hear is that it is a costly, anti-American and corrupt organization when in fact it is not that at all.

Countering the rabid hate speech directed at it from the Right would not be the ad's only scope. It would also offer good will and information on where our money is going.

Who would you contact with this idea in the U.N. to see if this were feasible? The Ad Council could donate resources so there would be no mis-directed resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES!!
Good idea.

:thumbsup:

I asked a freeper, on a messageboard, why, in detail, he hated the UN.
I got nothing in response.
These idiots just hear the dittomouths and repeat like a bunch of mina birds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nah.
The U.N. is not an organization to be "for or against". By advertising it will further turn itself into an issue. I think it's better to just smack down anti-UN positions when they crop up.

Better to weed, than to spray in this case. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. As an informational ad
I tend to disagree. Our money goes to the UN and that should be related to the mushroom masses here. Being on the fire offensive is more important in my mind than putting out spot fires and hope no further damage is done. Get Preemptive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It definitely has potential. I'm just worried about backlash.
This is the sort of thing that has profile. There's no concerted Anti-UN movement that I'm aware of right now. That could change once partisans catch wind of it.

With the current media atmosphere, I think there would be more coverage by partisans and pseudo news agencies repeating what is said by the partisans, than what is actually true.

And, going on the offensive by putting ads forward gives them targets to rake muck on. Whatever we say can be scoffed at, rationalized away, or just plain lied over.

We're not gonna change any partisan minds, but the question is what sort of effects would introducing this new variable into our volatile situation produce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. An Ad Agency
Could study the merits of your arguments but I can't see how a strong, well-crafted, well-researched and visible ad campaign could be turned negative.

Why do liars like the discredited SBV ads have an impact yet believing positive ads couldn't counter negativity when that is the preemptive goal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-02-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. The M$M has disallowed others to put up ads and programs.
If the M$M wants the public kept as misinformed as possible, they'll just refuse the UN, regardless of cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC