Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question about a counter-strike to banning the fillibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:21 PM
Original message
Question about a counter-strike to banning the fillibuster
Can the Senate pull the same stunt the Texas legisature did and not show up, thus denying quorum to the neo-cons?

David Allen
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. That would be a fine idea.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. The fillibuster cannot be burned. There are no quorum rules like Texas
They don't have enough votes to break the filibuster. If they try we could use the nuclear option and block ALL bills, except the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Block all bills!
not a bad idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. it only takes 51 senators to make a quorum
moreover, it takes 11 senators to question the existence of a quorum.
in other words, even if you don't have enough for a quorum, the senate can still operate unless 11 senators want it to stop. so 11 democrats would have to be present to challenge the presence of 51.

bottom line is, the banana republicans don't need any democrats to be present. the best democrats could do in this vein is to have 11 democrats show up and keep challenging the existence of a quorum. this would force most of the republicans to be physically present, which at least would keep them from their all-important photo-ops and fund-raisers. meanwhile, the rest of the democrats could be out in front of cameras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can't you filibuster the bill to stop filibusters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought it was a rules change which only required a
majority vote.

David Allen
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC