Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what the repukes aren't telling you is that malpractice insurance comp.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:14 AM
Original message
what the repukes aren't telling you is that malpractice insurance comp.
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 01:19 AM by NVMojo
like St. ****'s lost a frigging ton of money investing their insurance users (physicians) plans in Enron ...and other screwed up investment schemes.

snip....

"And they lost hundreds of millions in the stocks of crooked companies such as Enron and WorldCom. Insurers weren't the only ones to get hurt in the market. But unlike the rest of us, insurers can dig into consumers' pockets, raising premiums to cover their losses. That's why industry profits soared by $11.9 billion in the first three quarters of 2002.

What about the huge losses that insurers insist are forcing them rate increases? They're as phony as Enron's bookkeeping. Industry accounting practices permit insurers to write-off their claims payments -- including projections of future claims -- as losses for tax and regulatory purposes. Insurers therefore routinely inflate their projections of claims payments to make it look as if losses have soared. In previous crises, a huge portion of these phantom losses never materialized. Insurers then quietly book the "losses" as profits. Examination of their financial statements reveals the extent of the scam: from 1996 through 2001, insurers nationwide paid out an average of only sixty-nine cents in claims for every malpractice premium dollar they took in.

Lost in the debate over malpractice premiums is the true crisis: the epidemic of medical malpractice that kills over 160,000 American each year, according to the author of a landmark study by the Harvard School of Public Health. MICRA has made it impossible for many malpractice victims in California to hire a lawyer. Its cap -- now worth $68,000 in 1975 dollars -- has left many of the injured and next of kin without adequate resources. Finally, MICRA has undermined the powerful incentive for quality care provided by the threat of a lawsuit, protection that patients need in the era of profit-driven HMO care. That's why California consumers are calling for MICRA's repeal, even as President Bush has joined striking doctors and the insurance industry in support of a federal MICRA law.
-----------
Bio: Harvey Rosenfield is the President of the California-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and the author of Proposition 103. Web: www.consumerwatchdog.org

snip...

http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/healthcare/nw/nw003146.php3



back to top

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. The whole insurance thing is ass-backwards.
Instead of good doctors being forced out of business by insurance costs, the insurance companies should be refusing to insure doctors who have a bad malpractice record. By not covering the bad ones, the doctors who remain will be low risk, and can get lower premiums. A simple solution.

The problem is with the INSURANCE INDUSTRY!!! Not the patients, not the doctors, not the lawyers.

Why can't people figure that our??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they get it but it's about money. I've spent a few years working for Docs
and the ones I worked for thought the world owed them a high lifestyle most of the time. They were actually more pissed off at insurance companies and managed care companies who work to save employers money on their employee benefit plans....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-05 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks.
Edited on Thu Jan-06-05 01:59 AM by Tandalayo_Scheisskop
A perfect post for the website I admin. So posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC