Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is so GREAT about Wesley Clark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
propagandafreegal Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:31 PM
Original message
What is so GREAT about Wesley Clark?
I would like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's a republican who claims to be a democrat
Appeals to all the people who like Joe Lieberman and John McCain. A liberal republican, but a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A Republican????
He's pro-choice, pro-environment, pro-labor, anti-Iraq War, pro-gay rights, anti-Bush tax cuts (debt increases), etc. Why do you say he's a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You just describe McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. McCain is not pro-choice
Among others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. McCain's not pro-choice, not pro-labor, and definitely FOR Iraq War.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 02:52 PM by GOPBasher
So that's not like McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. McCain is pro-choice and anti Iraq war.
Nice try buddy. We're a little bit more informed on this site than you people give us credit for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
104. You sure he's pro-choice?
I coulda sworn that he was pro-life, or at least voted that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Because it's an easy slam, as are all lies.
He was never a Republican, and he's been out there tirelessly for Democrats, but that doesn't stop people who prefer not to deal in facts. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. hardly
he was the most progressive candidate in the race. He advocated real reform of the tax system so the rich would pay more and the working class would pay virtually no income tax. He understands how important real diplomacy is in order to advance a real foreign policy. He knows the real cost of war and won't rush in blindly. And he is an incredibly decent man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. more progressive than Kucinich?
Oh yeah forgot about him. Well he wasn't tall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Kucinich
has a right to life record in the House.

Clark isn't tall either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And clarke has no voting record
except when he was a registered republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Except he wasn't a registered republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. he was never
a registered Republican. He was an independent as all the top brass are. He was still the most progressive candidate in the race. Your insults don't change that one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
100. Sorry, but a statement that is objectively false is called "a lie."
We can't very well complain that people won't just come right out and say that Bush is a liar and then retreat into polite euphemisms when one of "our own" deliberately and repeatedly says something that is not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. You're doing a pretty good job
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 03:33 PM by Crunchy Frog
either of giving yourself away, or else demonstrating your complete ignorance of the facts.

Clark was never registered in any party until 2002. He was an independent who mostly voted Republican when he was younger (which he has made no attempt to conceal), and voted Clinton, Clinton, Gore, Kerry in the last four elections.

Again, nice try. (Oh, and you might want to try to be little more consistent on the spelling of his name.)

On the other hand, I think I see what you're trying to say and I stand corrected. Richard Clarke is indeed a registered Republican. Yup, you certainly got that one right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
72. Richard Clarke? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melnjones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
103. Sigh...
I think I read somewhere once that people need to hear things 7 times before they remember them. Well,

Clark never was a registered republican.
Clark never was a registered republican.
Clark never was a registered republican.
Clark never was a registered republican.
Clark never was a registered republican.
Clark never was a registered republican.
Clark never was a registered republican.

Hope that helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RafterMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. One minute he's a Republican
the next minute, the only person you can think of to his left is Kucinich.

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
propagandafreegal Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. I read he is a member of the Council of Foreign Relations that all the
other cronies are in. He is just another plant. He was in Kosovo and WACO did anyone know this?

He is being held up now as a HERO.

Don't trust him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Kosovo
was a great success. He built a NATO coalition that stopped a genocide. No one American was killed and lives were saved. I'm completely in support of that mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
propagandafreegal Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Check this out ro... he was doing double duty in Kosovo ro..
....There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and there were no mass graves holding tens of thousands of bodies ever found in Kosovo. Yet, as we documented in 1999 using reports from Jane's Intelligence Weekly and The Christian Science Monitor, in the process of conducting that war

Clark made safe the KLA's control over 70% of the heroin reaching Western Europe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. People who think Clarkies are behind re fighting the Primary Wars
Please read through this thread. Find any familiar arguments against Clark on it? So what am I supposed to do? Let them have their way I suppose. NOT

Actually I have business to attend to so I will have to check back in later. But contributions to preventing Clark character assassination attempts by fair minded backers of other candidates would be most welcome. Then it won't have to look like Clarkies are always going around looking for a fight. We are not. But we don't roll over to lies either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #45
69. "there were no mass graves"
In Kosovo? Jesus Christ even the Serbs themselves finally admitted to that. Well, except for Milosovic. I guess he's cool with you.

Uh, WMD wasn't the reason for the first Iraq war, honey, and he didn't participate in it. You need to get some book learnin'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
78. DUH....we know that Clark was in Kosovo.....
The Kosovo Albanians Muslims were glad to see General Wes Clark. He is their hero. Genocide was stopped in its tracks for the first time. Nato won its only War. I understand that many have portraits of Wes hanging in their home a la JFK and MLK here in the US.



The Presidential Medal of Freedom is awarded to people who have made especially meritorious contributions to U.S. national security, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors. The medal may be bestowed on citizens of other nations and may be awarded posthumously.

“Wes Clark richly deserves the Medal of Freedom, not just for the outstanding job he did leading NATO in its first and only conflict, but for a lifetime of distinguished service in the United States Army and for the Department of Defense. He brings energy and imagination to foreign and security policy and will continue to serve his country with distinction. All of his new colleagues at CSIS celebrate his well-deserved honor,” said CSIS president and CEO John Hamre.

Clark, Supreme Allied Commander Europe from July 10, 1997, until May 3, 2000, joined CSIS August 1 as a distinguished senior adviser. He will work across the full range of the Center’s programs, concentrating particularly on international security. Clark was in overall command of NATO’s military forces in Europe and led approximately 75,000 troops from 37 NATO and other nations participating in ongoing operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo. He also helped to negotiate the Dayton Peace Accords. In 1999, Clark commanded Operation Allied Force, the alliance’s military response to the Kosovo crisis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. Not only that, but he's also in posession of
secret mind control rays.



Careful about watching him on TV. He'll hypnotize you and turn you into one of us. Bwahahahahahah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That is pure...
D bullshit and if you ever saw an interview with him you'd know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I have
The man seemed very uncomfortable. He stuck to his talking points and most of them had to do with how he would handle Iraq. He seemed to think Dems are on board with the prez, they just needed better leadership. He took great pains to "look" democratic, but seemed like he would be more comfortable in a starchy 3-piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Somebody rip this guy a new one. I don't have time.
Where's Frenchie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I don't have the inclination.
I'm so sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:58 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
70. Oh shoot.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 03:51 PM by Sparkly
I got a deleted message and I didn't even get to see it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
47. This one isn't worth it.
He's such a giveaway that I'm just laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I haven't met you yet and I'm sad that it has to be under this post that
we do meet.

This happens to be why the Democratic party is in such a mess. There are those of us who think we know it all enough to bash and attack anyone and everything we don't understand. Though we say we are the party of diversity it seems we don't actually embody that on the ground.

I would suggest that you conduct some research and learn about whom you speak so that you could have more informative enlightening posts in the future. I

Please let's not meet under these circumstances again. I doubt I could hold my tongue as well as I did today.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Make sense sometime
Don't tell me that I am wrongfully bashing and then turn around bash me for it. I gave an opinion. OPINION. You do not have to like it, but I would appreciate a democratic party that wasn't so damn republican about opinions it doesn't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I didn't bash you. I was very very kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
58. My guess is that you'd like a Democratic party
that rolls over for the Republicans on every issue and keeps losing elections. My guess is that is why you find Clark so threatening.

I wouldn't worry so much. This country is usually much better off when Democrats are running things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. You bashed him on completely groundless manners points.
Clark is a willing tool and guess who's tool he'd be if he ever got elected to anything, which is unlikely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. Are you two working in tandem?
I know that's how you people do it alot of the time. I guess it's because you know you can't stand on your own two feet in a genuine discussion. You're not disguising it particularly well though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. No. Why, are you?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #59
81. Very clever comeback.
I'm tremendously impressed with your witty reparte.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
79. Researching facts = "manners points?"
Yeah, he was such a "willing tool" he stood up to Clinton and the Pentagon when he disagreed with them. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. Sort of like Ronald Reagan was a Democrat
pretending to be a Republican.

Appeals to conservative types like George McGovern, Charlie Rangel and Michael Moore.

Oh, and just so you know, I despise both Lieberman and McCain, and I actually voted for Dennis Kucinich in our state caucuses.

It was not the Clark supporters who were drooling over the idea of a Kerry/McCain ticket several months ago on this board.

I can see that we have our work cut out for us, educating people who have been unduly influenced by Rovian talking points and corporate media. Why don't you try informing yourself a little by checking out the information at this link.

http://clark04.com/issues/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Would you? Really?
Would you really, really like to know?

*sigh*

(incapsulated the pyschic predicts this thread will become a 250 post flamefest.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. 250 easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. If you really do want to know...
read up on him here:

http://www.clark04.com/issues/

This is a link to the old campaign site and Clark's stands on the issues are still all there.

If you just want to stir things up...there's a pizza waiting for you, I'm sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. self delete
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 02:50 PM by medeak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. what I liked about him
was his admission that he was so indoctrinated being in the military to believe everything the administration tells you...

that it took him three years after retirement "to figure it all out"

That's why he's a dem now... he saw the light after getting away from the "yes sir mr. president" mentality.

Was fortunate to meet and greet in small venue. Very impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, *this* thread is gonna go on for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. and it's going on without the OP
Funny now, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is my problem with Clark and why I withdrew my support from him.

Creating a 21st Century Civilian Reserve for 21st Century Challenges. General Clark challenges all Americans, men and women, to sign up for the Civilian Reserve. By signing up for the Civilian Reserve, volunteers promise to make a sacrifice for their country, when and where needed. In exchange, members of the Civilian Reserve would know that their unique talents and abilities were being effectively mobilized.




Calling up the Civilian Reserve if necessary. During a crisis, if sufficient volunteers were not available, the President would have the authority to call up as many as 5,000 Reservists, through a lottery of those with the required skills. The circumstances precipitating a mandatory call-up would be exceedingly rare, and the maximum period of active duty would be six months.

http://www.clark04.com/misc/003/

Exceedingly rare. Yeah, right. Tell that to the National Guardsmen in Iraq who have had their service extended without their consent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
propagandafreegal Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Civilian Reserve... please nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Civilian yes, but mandatory callup is mandatory
whether civilian or not. I don't think anyone owes this country anything but to pay taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. SO DON'T SIGN UP
It's just not that hard of a concept.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. So Then Don't Sign Up
It's a very simple concept.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
62. Oh, so you were the one? I remember, we talked about you -
the lifetime Clarie/lifetime Democrat who now saw the light.... MWO had a profile on you once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sportndandy Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. To all you thin skins
Get a grip. I am not insulting anyone and no one should be taking it that way.

Clarke is okay. That is it. He resembles a republican and some dems think that a guy who looks like a republican but believes like a democrat is the solution to our problems. Good luck. Its as vacuous as those who said women voted for Bush over Gore because he was more handsome.

Oh yeah. I voted for Clarke in the Delaware primary, so stew on that and keep calling me freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. You voted for Clarke?
I didn't know Richard Clarke ran for anything. But I'm sure he thanks you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. You can start by spelling his name right. Or are you confusing him
with Richard Clarke. The Republicans went after both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
63. I like Richard Clarke alot too, but I doubt very much
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 03:45 PM by Crunchy Frog
that you voted for him in any primary unless it was a write in. He is also a Republican, albeit, one with alot of honor and integrity. Nevertheless, if you voted for him in a primary you must have been voting in the Republican primary. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

And I don't have a thin skin about this at all. In fact, I'm finding it very entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Profile in political opportunism, photographs well, that about covers it.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. You Appear To Be the Same as All the Other Detractors
It's like a broken record.

:eyes:

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. When someone displays a level of knowledge rather than
trite talking points, then an opinion would be worthy of respect. :eyes:

Wes Clark is imminently suited and qualified on many points. If you are seeking help with research then ask with the positive intent of seeking positive replies. Photographing well works to Clark's advantage.

The current pResident can not master his inner sulky child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #42
97. It's always the same language.
It's almost as if they were reading from a script. Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
propagandafreegal Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. Why did Donnie Fowler quit his campaign? Cause Clark wanted to play
the GAME and listen to the Clintonistas.

He sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Fowler Was a Sore Loser and Not a Team Player
When the campaign grew naturally, he couldn't stand the idea of taking a position other than the big cheese, so he left in a huff and provided quotes to the media which were damaging to the candidate and the campaign. Now he's running for DNC Chair? No way.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Here is a great thread about Clark
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 03:40 PM by Tom Rinaldo
It is in the DU Wesley Clark Supporters Group so don't bother going there to disrupt. The rules are different in the support groups, there is no tolerance for people who do not support a candidate speaking against that person in those groups.

Great Clark quotes:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=235&topic_id=3434&mesg_id=3434
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. I'm glad to hear that I won't be seeing you there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #57
66. Well, I will give you this.
You certainly do know alot about crap posts dear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
60. Wow! The hatred level on this one surpasses the primaries flamefests
Someone must be really, really, really , really worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Seriously.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 03:49 PM by Sparkly
Could you IMAGINE if one of us posted the remark that (any candidate's name here) "SUCKS?" Could you IMAGINE the outcry? Some like to IMAGINE that we're "bashing" (any candidate's name here), even though I never have, but somehow this level of rhetoric against Clark is acceptable...

I think some are worried indeed. I think others worry that (any candidate's name here) can't or won't run again, while there's still the potential for Clark to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #65
96. My guess is that there's a somewhat different agenda
going on with these posts. I won't try to spell it out any more than that as it would be a rule violation. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Yes, it looks like Karl Rove is not pleased at all.
I think we've said just about everything that needs to be said. Anything else would just be feeding the trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
64. You want to know why I hate Clark? He's a back-stabbing, rumor-mongering
sore-losing idiot, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #64
77. Uh, let's see - our democracy is gone, right to vote in the toilet,
checks and balances gone, fascists will suck the treasury dry and wage wars over wars and DU is suddenly overrun with anti-Clark threads where flamers arrive in groups. Can someone explain this social phenomena? (I saw it happen on C-Span, but not supposed to name it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melnjones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #64
101. sore losing?
Hmm...that's a new one! Way to be creative. And it also explains oh-so-well why he supported Kerry 100% after he dropped out of the primaries, why he went on the campaign trail with him and for him, etc. etc. Amazing- he was (and STILL is) speaking out against Bush, supporting Democrats...what a jerk!

Unless, of course, you're speaking about when he retired...Maybe you need to do a little more research on that one. In fact, don't even bother, since that crap has been debunked a hundred times on these boards already.

In fact, every piece of crap thought that some people seem to have adopted from the GOP about Clark has been debunked as well, yet people continue to flame. Who is really the sore loser, my friend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #64
102. We Democrats are not being sore losers.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 04:38 PM by Crunchy Frog
There were many genuine fully documented incidents of fraud, intimidation, and various other "irregularities" in this election. We want the Democratic party to take a leadership role in uncovering abuses in the electoral system and making sure that our elections are genuinely free and fair.

That's not being a sore loser. It benefits Democrats and Republicans alike to know that our electoral system is free and fair.

Hate is not a good foundation for a political party, which is why the Republicans in their present form are going to fail in the end.

Wes Clark never stabbed anybody in the back. All he did was to tell the truth about Bush and try to hold him accountable for his failures and his disastrous policies. Again, that's not back stabbing, it's truth telling. Better get used to the fact that there's at least one Democrat out there who's going to do it.

After you get drafted and shipped off to Iraq, you'll be praying to have someone like him in charge of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
68. From a 2003 interview on NH Public Radio
"I think we're at a time in American history that's probably analogous to, maybe, Rome before the first emperors, when the Republic started to fall... I think if you look at the pattern of events, if you look at the disputed election of 2000, can you imagine? In America, people are trying to recount ballots and a partisan mob is pounding on the glass and threatening the counters? Can you imagine that? Can you imagine a political party which does its best to keep any representatives from another party — who've even been affiliated with another party — from getting a business job in the nation's capital? Can you imagine a political party that wants to redistrict so that its opponents can be driven out entirely?...it's a different time in America and the Republic is - this election is about a lot more than jobs. I'm not sure everybody in America sees it right now. But I see it, I feel it." - General Wesley Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. He sees and feels WHAT? Give me a break, the guy's clueless, sorry.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #68
91. The perfect quote for the times. this thread. pounding on the glass
to shut us up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
71. Ask Matt Drudge why people hate Clark. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #71
76. Ding, Ding, Ding!
A Drudge fan are we?

And tell us what Rush said about Clark too!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. No, it's what Clark said to Drudge, or have you conveniently forgotten
about Clarkie-boy's loose lips? You think I want a fishwife in the oval office? Guess again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. "Clarkie-boy?" Is this really necessary?
I feel like I'm in an AOL chatroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #80
92. You mean what Drudge said Clark said to other reporters
Because not even Drudge said Clark said it to him. He said Clark had said things about Sen. Kerry and an intern to reporters from news magazines. And then Drudge ran with the story for a good week or so. And what happened to that story, anyhow? Did it look Drudge look foolish?

And, it might be worthwhile noting, reporters who were THERE have said Clark said NO SUCH THING. But rumormongering about rumormongering is an interesting way of demeaning Clark. Especially when one cites Mr. Matt Drudge, the crotch sniffer par excellence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #71
94. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bill Lumbergh Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
74. He knows how to fill out TPS reports
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
82. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
83. looks like you bought the rw propaganda eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. In a "free market" buyers and sellers can sometimes be confused
But it seems an entire "market" poured on this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Which only goes to show some people will buy anything
and Karl Rove is a great salesman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
87. Clark fed Rove a little rumor, Drudge ran with it, Clark is a fool, end of
discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. Ohhh, you're talking about the Kerry affair rumor!!
And the rumor that Clark started it! All rumored of course, by the credible Matt Drudge!! Nevermind that some actual reporters set the story straight and said Drudge was completely wrong. You choose to believe Drudge.

End of discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. yeah, and Gore invented the internet and lied about the lullabye
Edited on Fri Jan-07-05 04:09 PM by robbedvoter
his mother sang to him. We went through all those already. As you guys like to say: "we counted them once, we counted them twice'..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. And Drudge also said
Sid Blumenthal beat his wife and that Hillary Clinton was about to be indicted. He also reported that we'd captured a- Zarquawi this week. And on and on.

I'm glad you put stock in Drudge. He's always a great source for stories about democrats. And he always tells the truth about what democrats say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
93. I asked this a while back, and let's just say I am convinced.
Wesley Clark is cool with me. FrenchieCat will enlighten you if you have any doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #93
98. Your question was asked respectfully and with the need for an answer
Enlightenment is not the purpose for this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. True dat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
105. To my Deanie Friends: They hate our guys, don't they?
I know you have to deal with threads like this one also...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
106. Locking...
Flamefest.

-DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC