Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

oppose bush*? -- don't worry there's a pill for that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:50 AM
Original message
oppose bush*? -- don't worry there's a pill for that
Opposing Bush: A Form of Mental Illness?
January 07, 2005
http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=485


When the 109th Congress convenes in Washington in January, Senator Bill Frist, the first practicing physician elected to the Senate since 1928, plans to file a bill that would define ‘political paranoia' as a mental disorder, paving the way for individuals who suffer from paranoid delusions regarding voter fraud, political persecution and FBI surveillance to receive Medicare reimbursement for any psychiatric treatment they receive," writes Hermione Slatkin, Medical Correspondent for the Swift Report. "Rick Smith, a spokesman for Senator Frist, says that the measure has a good chance of passing -- something that can only help a portion of the population that is suffering significant distress."

"If you're still convinced that President Bush won the election because Republicans figured out a way to hack into electronic voting machines, you've obviously got a problem," says Smith. "If we can figure out a way to ease your suffering by getting you into therapy and onto medication, that's something that we hope the entire 109th Congress will support."

Characterizing political dissent as a form of mental illness is the hallmark of authoritarian government. In China, for instance, forensic psychiatrists label dissent "political lunacy" (see Jacob Sullum, Head Games: What are the rules for defining mental illness?) and in Soviet Russia political dissenters were routinely cosigned to mental hospitals. Nowadays, with modern pharmacology, mental hospitals are no longer required -- the mental hospital is internalized through chemical intervention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. It'll never happen

as long as it means they have to PAY for the medication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. maybe not -- but
the implication is out there -- if you oppose bush* you must be crazy, therefore anything you say is a result of a mental illness and not to be taken seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, we've been told that by the media for quite some time, now.
I mean, what kind of unmitigated kook would even question a paper-trail free electronic voting system... especially one programmed by ex-felons employed by a company whose CEO promised to "deliver" electoral votes to Bush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. A few members of Congress would qualify for this then, I guess.
Are they going to recommend medication for them as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh? a bill means nothing if it's not in the DSM
and it won't be. Talk about nuts. What should we prescribe Frist? I recommend Haldol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. since when did accepted protocol or procedure ever . . .
limit what BushCo can do? . . . if they want to classify paranoid political dissent as a mental illness, they'll just go ahead and do it . . . or homosexuality, or "liberalism," or pro-choice, or whatever the hell they want . . . doing things "by the book" went out the window (along with the book itself) when Bush took office . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bronco69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. I swear
every freakin day I wake up and it's something new. No f**king wonder I'm constantly looking over my shoulder. These people scare the f**k out of me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is there a link for this idea other than the blogs?
I'm looking for a specific part where it says anything about "political paranoia" that backs up what these writers are saying. I followed links to two blogs, World Net Daily, and the link to the "New Freedom Initiative" and I can't find anything specific.

Did you all find anything "official" that says this? If you do, please share, because I want to pass it on, but I need more specifics. Are these just suppositions by the author? This whole possibility scares the crap outa me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. This article is originally from a satire site, like the Onion
Do not be fooled.

Amazingly, it isn't really such a stretch, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC