izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 10:25 AM
Original message |
|
Is there a thread on the DU documenting impeachable offenses to be catalogued for future use?
|
tavalon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
it probably ought to be put in the Demopedia.
|
izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
impeachable offenses that have actually occurred? I hear a growing number of people wanting to seek this route. If the time comes it will be helpful to have some facts organized in the arsenal.
|
s-cubed
(860 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
2. This site is trying to do that, |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 10:32 AM by scubed
but it seems to be ignoring past impeachable acts. http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/extra/archives/2005_01.htmlI agree, should start in Demopedia. Also, should include Cheney, not just Bush.
|
Liberty Belle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
There may also be stuff at www.impeachbush.com (.org?) and at the Redefeatbush site.
|
izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
the above site is a start but...we need other reasons then what they give in their articles of impeachment. Not for reasons of fact but for reasons of politics. It doesn't get in more egregious than what they have listed. but what about others? are their other reasons that are legally impeachable?
|
izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Perhaps it could link all in government to... |
|
such things. No one should be immune from such a listing-if oversight is going to be restored that is.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |