What would you think of Max Cleland as Vice President

[adadem]

Although Max Cleland is supporting Kerry I believe he would be a fine Vice President for any of the candidates for several reasons.

He is experienced in government, he's a combat veteran and it helps that as a Georgian he's a Southerner. What a repudiation of what the Republicans did to him in 2002 that would be! I believe it would also send the message "No matter what your disability or hardship you can overcome those obstacles". What do you think?

[IndianaGreen]

1. I voted "No" because we can't have two Southeners on the ticket!

If either Clark or Edwards wins the nomination, we cannot have two Southerners on the ticket.

[Buffler]

2. Why not?

Clinton & Gore were two southerners and easily won in 92 and 96.

[robsul82]

17. Clinton/Gore easily won in '92?

News to me...if Clinton doesn't write a thank you note to Perot every single year at Christmas for the '92 election, he's an ungrateful snot. j/k

Later.

RJS

[adadem]

3. Why not?

I'd be ok with it and I'm a Northerner.

[HardRain]

4. Two Southerners . . . . .

. . . is how we won TWICE -- in '92 and '96.

But, I don't think Max has the stamina and stomach for a national run. How about Clark/Edwards?

[IndianaGreen]

5. We won in 1992 because of Clinton's charisma

and because Perot was running, and because Bush glanced at his watch during a Presidential debate.

We won in 1996 because of Clinton's charisma and he was the incumbent, and because Newt overplayed his hand when he shut down the government.

[mtop]

6. Newt shut down the government?

I'm confused...I thought Clinton did that.

[Buffler]

7. You are correct

Clinton did it by not signing the needed legislation to keep it open.

On Edit: Thats how I remember it. I could be wrong and Newt prevented the House from passing said legislation. But I don't remember it happening that way.

[AntiCoup2K4]

8. Nope. It was Newt.

And it all came from petty jealousy over being snubbed on Air Force One, if I remember correctly.

But if you're confused about that, Mr fr..iendly neighbor, then perhaps you may be confused about other things?

[dansolo]

9. Absolutely not

He allowed himself to be smeared and lost his re-election, after trying as hard as he could to support everything Bush wanted, and now he has silently left the 9/11 comission with a lot of unanswered questions. I don't care that he is a decorated veteran, I have very little confidence in him.

[ShaneGR]

10. No, but not because I dislike Cleland

I just think we have stronger candidates for that spot, and I believe the ticket should be a combination of two campaigns who made it to the end.

[flaminbats]

11. A Kerry/Cleland ticket would rock!

As a Senator Kerry would do best to pick an outsider, a southerner, or a mid-westerner.

After losing in 2002, Cleland is not someone most would think of as an insider. Clark would be another great choice in the south, or Governor Kathleen Sebelius to provide a boost in Kansas or Missouri.

[Doctor_J]

12. Sure

I'd prefer Someone younger (Edwards) who will be ready to take over in 2012. But I really think it would be good to have two war heroes running against to two cowards.

[MoonRiver]

13. What an amazing idea!

I think he would be incredible with either Gen. Clark or Kerry. Both the team would be war heros with the injuries and awards to boot. Up against them would be chickenhawks AWOL and draft dodger Cheney. :D

[hlthe2b]

14. Cleland's a truly honorable man... And, there would be some delicious

aspects to it-- vindicating a smeared war veteran and honorable public servant at the hands of the Repubs. Plus, it would be a really nice precedent to have the first wheel-chair bound disable vet as VP. Having said that, I have to admit, I don't know enough of his views to make an educated assessment right now.

[LynneSin]

15. I absolutely ADORE Max Cleland

And think he would make the best choice for Vice-President, regardless of the candidate.

:D

[adadem]

16. Me, too n/t

[robsul82]

18. Rove would tear it apart.

Here's how it'd go. Ads beginning with a nice, warm voiceover - "Max Cleland. Vietnam veteran. War hero. But, regretfully..." Then cut to fear-based crapola about letting a man with one limb be a heartbeat away from the presidency. It'd work, too.

Later.

RJS

[Feanorcurufinwe]

19. You think that would work?

You are entitled to your opinion, but no, the ad you describe would backfire badly on Bush, IMHO.

[mlawson]

20. You are right, it would work.

I can just hear certain voters now: "Oh, that poor man, just look at him. I'm sure he is smart and qualified, but we just can't have HIM as VP. Oh, no no, it wouldn't do...".

Had the voters knwn about FDR, he would have lost, as well, although simply being paraplegic wouldn't lose it for him, now. But having only one limb would. We haven't 'grown up'enough yet for tht.

[ecstatic]

21. I voted No. Cleland has been way too silent

He's not speaking up about Bush or this war.