Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wal-Mart's charm offensive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 01:59 AM
Original message
Wal-Mart's charm offensive
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 01:59 AM by quaoar
Wal-Mart's CEO has launched a PR campaign to improve the company's image and to counter the idea that they oppress their workers and stifle competition.

Heaven's to Betsy, where did they ever get that idea. LOL

AOL is running a poll on Wal-Mart:

What do you think of Wal-Mart?
It's mostly good 57%
It's mostly bad 43%
Do you do any shopping at Wal-Mart?
Yes, and I feel fine about it 51%
I don't shop there 28%
Yes, but I feel guilty about it 21%
Total Votes: 258,711

Anybody here still shop at Wal-Mart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope.
I do not do such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleonora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I do
I'm too broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Us vs Them Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just voted in that poll
Here's the article that goes along with it:


Company's CEO on Offensive Against Critics
By CHUCK BARTELS, AP

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (Jan. 13) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc. chief executive Lee Scott led a media charge Thursday to counter criticism that the world's largest retailer is a behemoth that takes advantage of its workers and stifles competition.

Scott said he wants Wal-Mart workers to know the company was speaking up for them and he wants Wal-Mart to have a better handle on how it is perceived among members of the public.

The company bought full-page ads in more than 100 newspapers around the nation to highlight its message that it provides opportunity for advancement and that its stores provide mainly full-time jobs that come with a broad benefits package.

''We want to get those myths off the table, set the record straight,'' Scott said in a phone interview. He was in New York City for a round of media interviews.

But a union critic of the discount chain said Thursday the company was ignoring social costs created by its megastores. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union said Wal-Mart was bending the truth.

Union spokesman Greg Denier said Wal-Mart may count about three-fourths of its workers as full time, but said those employees don't get full 40-hour weeks. He said the health insurance the company touts is too expensive and does not provide enough coverage for illnesses that are short of catastrophic.

Wal-Mart has 1.2 million employees in the United States, making it the nation's largest private employer. Scott said Wal-Mart gives communities stable jobs, and workers have advancement opportunities and benefits that include stock purchase, a 401(k) retirement plan, discount cards and other benefits.

Scott said the company wants to take its message directly to its customers and their communities.

''Customers trust us, and they want to know their trust is well placed,'' Scott said.

That's true of some Wal-Mart shoppers but not most, said Jim Rice, chief credit officer at Bernard Sands Retail Performance Monitor in New York.

''I don't think a majority of shoppers pay attention to either the charges or to Wal-Mart's defense,'' Rice said. ''If Wal-Mart has good selection and good prices, they'll keep shopping.''

Rice said Wal-Mart was right to respond to its detractors.

''Any time you don't answer (criticism), you're going to suffer damage,'' Rice said, noting Wal-Mart often has let its critics speak and not mounted a defense. ''This will have a positive effect.''

Rice said the message from Wal-Mart would help rally employees, and could resonate in communities where Wal-Mart wants to expand. The investment community is another matter.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. fell 44 cents, to close at $53.64 on the New York Stock Exchange Thursday, when most stocks were pressured by higher oil prices and concerns over the economy.

Rice also said the assertions by Wal-Mart could generate a backlash among the company's opponents. The UFCW has been striving for years to organize Wal-Mart workers.

Denier said the union took issue with almost every assertion Wal-Mart made, calling its claims ''just deceptive.''

Wal-Mart allows a worker to qualify for full-time benefits for working 34 hours a week. But Denier said people who hear that Wal-Mart has 74 percent full-time workers expect those employees to be putting in a regular 40 hours.

Wal-Mart has been the target of lawsuits accusing the company of bias against women and not paying employees for all the hours they worked. Wal-Mart has vigorously fought the court actions.

Joseph M. Sellers, an attorney in a gender discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart in San Francisco in which the plaintiffs want to bring in 1.6 million current and former female workers, took issue with Wal-Mart's claims.

''It is hard to reconcile Wal-Mart's claim that it is serving everybody when it systematically underpaid and under promoted its 1.6 million women employees for nearly a decade,'' Sellers said in an e-mail.

Scott noted that the company has put in place a fresh diversity program and has made other changes to ensure greater fairness. He also said the company was eager to listen to its critics and will make changes when necessary.

Wal-Mart failed in an attempt last year to put a store in Inglewood, Calif., where the retailer lost a referendum. Critics painted the company as an unwanted source of traffic and low-paying jobs. There is a move in some cities to limit Wal-Mart, Target Corp. and other big box retailers because of the sprawl they bring.

Scott said the criticism from so many different directions has swallowed Wal-Mart's central message.

''I liken it to being nibbled to death by guppies,'' Scott said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. only certain things
fabric and sewing supplies and some food i can`t buy anywhere else. i can`t but those things within 40 miles...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electric-eye Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. mostly no, but I did today
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 02:12 AM by electric-eye
Rushhour traffic and miles to the alternative.

I needed a halogen bulb.

But I'll tell you - I used to shop here frequently, and the place was so packed - any given day or night, that I could hardly find a spot to park. Not so this evening.

Parking lot maybe a quarter full. Store-wide tv system which used to blast pro-bushica images while you shopped turned off. Greeter looked away from me. Stood for too long in one of maybe six slow-moving lines open (out of probably thirty).

The place was relatively dead.

I might go back from time to time just to walk thru, but not buy.

Was there a backlash to wal-mart taking its customers for granted early in last Christmas' shopping season? They dramatically lowered prices and clearly attempted some damage control after the first big days of "holiday shopping season."

Have customers really strated to leave wm in droves?

What I saw tongiht makes me wonder.

edited for spelling, clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. On the latter question...
... that's not much of a spread.

Wal-Mart seems to be following a fairly predictable course of action, though--it's much cheaper for them to launch a PR campaign than to actually fix the problems which are endemic within Wal-Mart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smurfygirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have shopped at walmart for odd things at 2 or 3 am
Edited on Fri Jan-14-05 02:45 AM by smurfygirl
One of my new years resolutions was to not purchase anything there ever again. So far so good. I do have to take something back there that I recieved for x-mas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debs Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Under no circumstances
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. i do not commit high crimes, only misdemeanors.
:evilgrin:

nah, never go in the store myself. i have too many choices of better places to go (live in SF Bay Area, 4th largest US metro area, my choices are broad, wal-mart's selection is weak).

though going into the store to take up space, use up a cart, and shift around a bunch of items sounds like fun. might do it if i have absolutely nothing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Everything Wal-Mart does is offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Buy Blue effects?
Not that Walmart wasn't offensive for its predatory business practices before 2004, but I know they were the biggest RED political donor this year and were at the top of the list on websites like Choosetheblue.com and Buyblue.org

Supposedly economic initiatives like this don't work...at least that's what the MSM tells us...but it does make you wonder?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC