Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Limbaugh Thinks Edwards Can Beat Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:13 PM
Original message
Limbaugh Thinks Edwards Can Beat Bush
I looked through the threads till about noon and I didn't see a thread on this subject.

While I was on my lunch break today, I flipped over to oxyrush's show to see what the con perspective was on Iowa.

To my amazement, and honest to God, I heard our druggy friend on the right admitting that Bush could loose to Edwards. This is the first time I have heard anything except the mythical "landslide" come out of his mouth. He sounded very depressed, and said he was running a "JFK" type campaign, and that he was like "Bill Clinton without the baggage"

This was very encouring to me, to see the righties disalusioned at this early stage of the race. I had honestly heard very little about Edwards until his strong finish yesterday in Iowa, and had for the most part dismissed him as a major candidate.

To this I say good luck to Edwards, and whoever is the nominee has their work cut out for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why the hell would he say that?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Obvious...
He just had his Oxycontin prescription refilled...

I hear it messes with the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Because his future ratings depend on a Democrat in the WH
Rush needs a Democrat in the WH. He is all about the money/ratings. He can't keep his right wing hate group focused without a target. Rush ratings are tanking and the cure is a Democrat in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Bingo, an excellent point
Secretly, he is hoping for a Democrat winning, because God knows he'll still be rich, and he'll have something to bitch about and get ratings up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
57. exactly! without Clinton to hate, they have nothing
Look, the GOP runs every branch of government, and look what a disaster it's been!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. I'm sorry. You're believing him?
This paragon of honesty? You're buying this spit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
62. No, I'm not. That's why I asked WHY would he say that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Why??? For once rush tells the truth.
Edwards can indeed beat bush. And so can Clark and Dean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
55. Maybe because after Dean, Edwards is the weakest on
national defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loren645 Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. To boost one of our least formidable candidates.
If they can't get Dean, they'd like Edwards.
IMO.
I like Edwards (tho' cant forgive his IWR/Patriot Act votes),
but he doesn't have Clark's toughness. Or even Kerry's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've heard the "Bill Clinton without the baggage" phrase before
Who knows? Still, it's interesting to see Rush say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Okay, now I know he's lying.
Because Bill Clinton's baggage was a gift to them. They looked for anything else but sex was all they could find. And even then they desperately tried to make it rape, serial rape.

Rush thinks he's the weakest of the high number guys still left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Limbaugh is up to something.
If he's deviating from his usual hype, he's either got an ace up his sleeve or a knife in his boot. I wouldn't take anything that he's saying at its face value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I about fainted yesterday when Scarborough
was saying how great Edwards was. Makes you go hummmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I heard that too.
He said "Republicans should be afraid of Edwards".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Makes you go, ooooooh, the blastfax is working.
Create interest in the weakest of the strong ones.

This one they're sure they can beat in a walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. Tucker Carlson was also complimenting him a lot
Talking about what a great personality Edwards has, especially one on one. Hmm... I guess Edwards is definately not as polarizing as some of the other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Funny, other Rethugs are saying the same now. Like Joe Scarborough.
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 05:18 PM by blm
I think they don't want to be beaten by the AWOLSTICK.

Remember how Rush's anal cyst deferment came out? After he attacked Kerry's patriotism. heheh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of Course Rush Would Say That
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ruh, Roh. That can't be good for John.
I wonder what they have up their sleeves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Today in class, something weird happened about Edwards
Edited on Tue Jan-20-04 05:19 PM by sgr2
We were discussing all of the candidates, and this Republican girl in the back of the room (I know her, always defends Bush) said, drumroll please:

If the Dems nominate Edwards I would vote for him over Bush.

I was like, WHAT?????

She said the following:

1. He's very good looking
2. He's a great speaker, and it's refreshing to hear a Democrat with a positive message
3. He's a self-made man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. But will she support him after they "Rove" him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. She guaranteed it
And they have very little to Rove him with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. She'll be pissed they went negative on a guy who's so positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. "He's very good looking"????????????
I do not like this focus. She ALWAYS was pro-Bush? No tenuous signs of disillusion?

Oh, goody. The campaign is paying college students to spread disinformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. You think this sort of thing doesn't matter in the election???
Are you serious??? The 15% apolitical voters inh the center vote for exactly this sort of superficial reason. In this TV age, someone ugly couldn't possibly be elected prez, no matter what they say or stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valjean Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. Interesting since...

That seems interesting since George W Bush is the antithesis of a self made man.

I seriously think that the Republicans are pumping up Edwards for a reason. We heard this from Ben Stein on Caucus night. You know they will go after him for being a trial lawyer.

I dunno, something is fishie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. No, she's just some 22 yr old college girl
It's not some sort of conspiracy, she's a political science major so she pays attention to what's going on. You'd be surprised how many moderate Republicans will vote Dem if provided with someone who doesn't scare them or presents a good image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would be very suspect of anything that Rush says that might be
good for the Democrats!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Rush also says he's done nothing wrong....legally speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sounds like Rush will be heading back to rehab soon.
Edwards beat bush? A pro-war dem who claims that he doesn't like the war he helped start against a pro-war halfwit. Yeah right. Not unless over half the electorate start hitting the oxycontin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Limpballs is a liar
I believe nothing he says. TURN IT OFF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Limpballs thinks?
Tell me that is a misprint.
Limpballs spouts.
Limpballs pontificates.
Limpballs rants.
Limpballs sneers.
Limpballs lies.
One thing he doesn't do is think.
Why does anyone here care what he says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. So now Rove wants to run against Edwards?
is that it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Subtle, ain't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I don't think Rove is happy at the current "toss up" field
the GOP just doesn't know where to direct the attacks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
44. Sounds like the 'brar' patch fable to me.
I imagine the very LAST Dem Rove wants to run against is John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. Limbaugh's sand bagging.
They are gearing up to run against Edwards as money grubbing trial attorney.

I in no way agree with the assessment but that has got to be their plan.

I'm hoping that Edwards will make a great VP to Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Edwards will eviscerate them on the "trial lawyer" issue
The rethugs tried it in '98 and Edwards beat them over the head with it.

Remember, he worked for people, not corporations.

And he has former clients who are more than happy to vouch for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. he was losing UNTIL they brought up the trial lawyer thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. You had better hope that none of the companies that he sued in his
career ever went out of business and put people out of work.

I can see the commercial right now.

Pan a beautiful, expensive house that is currently owned by one of Edwards' former clients. Then interview poor ol' Goober who is living in a run down shack, collecting food stamps and aluminum cans to make ends meet all because mean old John Edwards closed down the plant and put some poor dad out of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. The instate corp -- the hospital -- changed policies and treated nurses
better as a result. It saved lives.

The out of state corp (the trucking company) got the Republican legislature to change the law to protect them from the liability Edwards's trial court decision threatened to impose on them. NC'inians should be pissed. The rest of America should think that any company that benefitted from that sort of Republican protectionism SHOULD be out of business.

The out of state swimming pool pump company should have gone to JAIL. They're lucky to still be in business.

As for the insurance companies who were the parties who really covered these damages, the Bush family and Republicans have allowed them to have the best years of their lives in the 20 years Edwards has worked against them. They're fucking loaded and run the government. That's why Edwards is running for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. What freaked me out about it was,
that he said something to the effect, that yeah, he was a trial lawyer and whatnot, but a lot of people see that as "sticking up for the little guy" And how there's really nothing to hit him hard with.

Im just wondering what his ulterior motive was today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. I have two extreme right wing relatives. Both like Edwards.
One said he would donate some money to the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #30
59. Birds of a feather..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. One of his major targets of hatred, the ACLU, is helping him, and
he's seen the light??

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. JRE better watch out. Rush 'n' Rove will probably
be paying 16 year old girls, drug pushers, etc., to compromise him. And I'm sure they have a few tricks up their sleeve for Clark, Kerry, and everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. The Dean trial baloon has floated to the ground. They have to be realistic
...and it's true. Everywhere I turn, people are talking about considering Edwards -- people on the right, people on the far left.

Rush is letting people know: if you really love Bush, he's going to lose to Edwards.

I'm sure his own audience is wondering why they should hate Edwards. It can't be obvious. His demographic is the working class. Those are the people Edwards has helped all his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. The GOP talkers are the GOP's "tell"
Rush bashes Clark, nice to Edwards
Scarlborogh bashes Clark, nice to Dean and Edwards
Tweety bashes Clark, nice to Dean
Dole nice to everybody except Clark

It's good to see people catching on to what some of us have been noticing for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rooktoven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
39. Even a broken clock syndrome...
I think they know that Edwards is squeaky clean and has a background that resonates with people. Remember, some Democrats voted for Reagan because he was "likable". That was supposedly dumbya's strength too-- but what happens if they have to run against someone _more_likable.

Sometimes cowards like Rush and Scarborough will accidentally voice their fears. Roveco wants Edwards LEAST of all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Edwards is young, attractive, and the "son of a mill worker"
Theres no way that Bush would win if he had to go against Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
45. I'm sure the point's already been made, but...
isn't it obvious what Big L's doing? The handwriting's on the wall for Dean - he's history. Who is the next weakest candidate? Who isn't Wesley Clark - the nominee the pugs are most concerned about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loren645 Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #45
61. Exactly my take on it. Edwards it their second choice for Bush to
roll over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
46. I've been telling you guys this for months
and telling you why and now limbaugh is coopting my material ?

figures...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spirochete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
48. They can all beat Bush
Limpballs just doubled up on his Oxy today. Probably in fear of Kerry kicking Chimp's ass in November, but any of the candidates can beat the Crawford Cretin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. Newsflash: Limbaugh is a Drug Addict
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
50. I'm afraid you only happened..........
to hear part of his story today. As rush often does he will give a half hearted compliment to a lib, only to turn around and squash the lib a few moments later. Trust me here. He never,ever says anything good about us at all. He is not to be trusted. Pretend you never heard one word from him. He is the Devil:evilfrown: !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
51. Headlong Rush To Republican Defeat (Hee!, Hee!, Hee!)
I confess that after nearly twenty years of institutionalized Republican Party nastiness, I'd be more than happy to follow up a Democratic presidential victory in 2004 with gloating faxes to the (Poo-Poo)In Broadcasting network marking Dubya's defeat, with similar follow-up faxes and e-mails to Whirled Nertz Daffy's Dow Jones affiliate. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
53. Limbaugh is an entertainer
Limbaugh is an entertainer, though a dangerous one.
I think he was actually speaking as an entertainer. He knows that Bush did as well as he did last election only because of perceived likeability and celebrity (he looks alot like his father), and he knows that Edwards is more likeable.

Why he would tell his public this, I don't know except to focus them on the new "threat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
54. Let's let Rush pick the nominee!
Do you know how to tell if Rush is lying? If you can hear him, he's lying.

He is a big fat idiot, lying liar.

This is no slight to Edwards, who I sincerely believe could beat Bush. I happen to believe that Kerry, Dean and Clark could also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
56. OxyRush has better ratings when DEMS are in power...
...so he could really care less, one way or the other- I dont find him too sincere about anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreissig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
60. Don't Play Poker With Rush Limbaugh
This is the second warning in my "Don't Play Poker With . . . " series.

Don't play poker with Rush Limbaugh, he keeps showing his cards and losing. You feel guilty about taking his money.

Need political advice from the opposing party? Ask Rush Limbaugh, he'll never steer you wrong. Oh yeah, su-u-u-ure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
63. Anti-lawyer bigotry
One thing I've noticed is that, even here- a bastion of liberalism- there is a lot of antipathy towards lawyers. As a law student, I personally do not understand it, but there is no denying that even many self-proclaimed liberals are blinded by their hatred of people with the nerve to pass the bar. It is to the point that it makes this place unpleasant to visit sometimes.

I think Rush realizes this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
64. I really liked Edwards and Gep right from the beginning...then
I sided with Kucinich. I like Kucinich still; I think Edwards and Kucinich are both about the People, so whichever of these two begin to climb in upcoming caucuses and primaries etc I will support.

'Of the People, by the People, for the People...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC