Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:44 PM
Original message
OBAMA
Is anyone actually serious when they post about this guy?

He seems like a good guy, and I'm glad he's a Senator, but are you all seriously suggesting we should put him on the ticket with 4 years experience in the Senate? Seriously?

Just asking because to me the idea seems idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. John Edwards had less than six years experience as a senator
For instance. What experience did JFK have?

Let's roll around to the Republicans. What experience did Ronnie Reagan have - couple lousy terms as California governor? How about W?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Edwards had at least a full term under his belt and JFK had plenty
JFK was in his 8th year as a Senator and had previously served for 4 or 6 years in the House.

I think Obama's great, but as he himself has said, he has no business running for President in 2008. 2012 or 2016 are far more viable dates for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. A couple of terms of governor of the biggest state?
seems like a perfect place to run for president from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. JFK was in either the Senate or the House from 1947
until he was elected president in 1960.

I still maintain that Edwards was too wet behind the ears to run in 2004.

Obama is a future candidate, 2012 or 2016, 2008 is way too early to even think about.

Why waste an opportunity when he is not ready?

This guy has been a senator for barely a week and the last thing he needs to do is start thinking about running for president or being on a ticket in a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. JFK had four (?) years in the house and won a second term to the senate
He wasn't actually a senator for two terms because he started campaigning for president the second he was re-elected. Much more political experience than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AVID Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. some people are ready - age or experience in the senate
notwithstanding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm from Illinois. People outside the state should buzz off for a year or
two at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barackmyworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know about the experience factor, but there is something else
It's sad to say it, but I don't think America would be ready for a black president in 4 years. A lot of racism still exists in this country (often covert).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. He has said no to 2008,
but maybe 2012.

He says he does not want to stay around the Senate for as many years as Kerry did, if he is going to run for President. He does not want a long record that they can distort and smear, the way they did with Kerry's record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Speaking for myself
it is the inclusion of his message. Unlike the repubs whose 'platform of inclusion' doesn't seem to reach farther than the corners of their mouths, Obama makes you feel it.

What he says touches the best in me and makes me have hope again for this country and there's little enough of that any more.

Simply that makes me want to see him on the ticket, and I believe that he COULD win. I think there are enough like me to overcome just about anything the right could throw.

However, the more he touches people like me, the shorter I think his lifespan will be and if he looks like a draft choice for 2008, that will be the year we see another candidate die on the campaign trail. I believe Obama is too much a threat to the right to be allowed to live long enough to fulfill his potential.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Lyndon Johnson was elected Majority Leader of the US Senate 4 years
into his first term. Jimmy Carter had 4 years experience as governor of Georgia. Trent Lott had been a senator for just 7 years when he replaced Bob Dole as majority leader.

The longer a political figure remains in office, the more likely corruption is to occur.

I have no problem with Obama on the ticket in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Trent Lott had been in the House since
1974 and he also was plenty corrupt when he assumed the leadership. I will grant the Carter example though he had been in the military for several years and had been in politics for a while too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Actually dsc, Lott was first elected to the house in 1972
I remember it well because I voted for the first time that year. Lott was the Republican nominee, a state senator named Ben Stone was the Democrat. I voted against Trent in his first race, and every time his name has been on the ballot since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Lott is such an ass
I actually could stand Cochran but Lott just made me want to vomit whenever I saw or heard him. I take it you must live near the Gulf Coast since that is where his district must have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. At the time, I was registered in Laurel (about 1 1/2 hours from the coast)
Edited on Sun Jan-16-05 10:14 PM by Rowdyboy
but I was a freshman in college in Jackson, 90m miles north of the district.

Cochran is a conservative, but I really have no serious problem with him. He's actually a reasonable guy. However, I detest Lott, Barber, Pickering, Wicker, Tuck etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. when I lived there I was in the Delta district
which meant I got Thompson as a Congressman. That was nice. But I was there under Fordice who was a total piece of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. We shouldn't run senators
Obama may be the greatest person and senator in the world, but senators (and congressional reps) are rarely elected to the presidency. They have terrible odds against winning a presidential election. We start out "behind the eight-ball" if we decide to run a senator for the presidency. Governors have better chances of willing presidential elections.

1960 is the last time a senator was elected to the presidency. Think of all the senators who have tried to win the presidency since then.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. He'll have two years of experience in the senate
Because campaigning starts right after the 2006 midterm elections. Could've happened back in the early 20th century but political experience of some kind is considered a MUST these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. "political experience of some kind is considered a MUST these days."
or having a father who was president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. OFFICIALLY Bush had 6 years as Governor of Texas
But we all know that somebody else was probably actually running the state, not to mention that the Texas governorship is one of the weakest in the nation. Arguably the Lieutenant Governor has more power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC