Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RFID readers--could "sweep" protest crowds for IDing people

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 01:57 PM
Original message
RFID readers--could "sweep" protest crowds for IDing people
http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,65243,00.html

But federal mandates for adding RFID chips to driver's licenses would create an impossible burden for states, which will have to shoulder the costs of generating new licenses, and installing reader devices in their motor vehicle offices, said a states' rights advocate.

RFID tags inside driver's licenses will make it easy for government agents with readers to sweep large areas and identify protestors participating in a march, for example. Privacy advocates also fear that crooks sitting on street corners could remotely gather personal information from individual's wallets, such as their birth dates and home addresses -- the same information many bank employees use to verify account holders' identities.

RFID tags, which respond to signals sent out by special reader devices, have in some tests demonstrated broadcast ranges up to 30 feet. Reader devices have proven to possess similar "sensing" ranges. This is what has some privacy advocaters worried, including one testifying tomorrow before the Virginia legislators.


RFID tags, which respond to signals sent out by special reader devices, have in some tests demonstrated broadcast ranges up to 30 feet. Reader devices have proven to possess similar "sensing" ranges. This is what has some privacy advocaters worried, including one testifying tomorrow before the Virginia legislators. "The biggest problem is that these tags are remotely readable," said Christopher Calabrese, council for the American Civil Liberties Union's Technology and Liberty Program



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...and a small device that costs about $6 in parts...
...can jam the whole thing. (speaking of a low-power RF jammer).

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 30 seconds in a microwave oven will likely disable the chip...
...permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Or a simple tin foil envelope...
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 02:18 PM by Salviati
I mean you didn't think there wasn't actual science behind the :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Very true
A little Gaussian shield to brighten your day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. We're all going to need tin-foil wallets with these things.
</serious>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Long RFID subcutaneous thread.....
I made a very detailed series of subcutaneous RFID postings on another forum. Anyone interested in the topic PM me and I will give you the link. If someone wants to port my posts here, be my guest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wallets Made of Metal May Become Very Popular
Put that sucker in a Faraday cage and watch them try to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3 DanO Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Any device that can read and RFID chip at 30 feet
can be detected itself at a much greater distance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC