Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Divisions Persist After Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:01 PM
Original message
Political Divisions Persist After Election
Media trying to imply the public wants Dems to play nice with GOP...interesting...... :-)


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16073-2005Jan17.html?sub=AR

washingtonpost.com
Political Divisions Persist After Election
Nation Unsure, Hopeful About Bush, Poll Finds
By Richard Morin and Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 18, 2005; Page A01

<snip>Fewer than half of those interviewed -- 45 percent -- said they preferred that the country go in the direction that Bush wanted to lead it, whereas 39 percent said Democrats should lead the way. During the first months of his presidency, after the bitterly disputed 2000 election, Americans said they preferred Bush to take the lead by 46 percent to 36 percent.

But the public also wants cooperation from the Democrats. At a time when Democratic leaders are preparing to challenge many of Bush's major initiatives, nearly seven in 10 Americans agree that Bush's victory means that congressional Democrats should compromise with him -- even if it means compromising on their party's principles. Only one in four said Democrats must not compromise on things they find objectionable, even if it means less gets accomplished.

<snip>On Social Security, the poll offered mixed findings that underscore the enormous challenge facing Bush at the start of what both parties see as the most significant legislative battle of the second term.

Those surveyed gave Bush negative marks -- 38 percent approval vs. 55 percent disapproval -- for his handling of the Social Security issue, and three in five said the system will not have enough money to pay benefits by the time they retire. But by 54 percent to 41 percent, the public supported a plan that would include a reduction in the rate of growth of guaranteed benefits and private savings accounts financed with a portion of payroll taxes. A proposal with those elements is under consideration by the Bush administration.<snip>

Americans divide equally over Bush's proposal to index Social Security benefits for future retirees to increases in the cost of living rather than to wage growth as is now the case, a change that would effectively mean benefits would be lower than currently projected. A clear majority of Americans -- 55 percent -- support the president's proposal to allow younger workers to put some of their Social Security savings into stocks or bonds. When packaged together, the two components draw the support of 54 percent of those surveyed.<snip>


1,007 randomly selected adults interviewed Jan. 12 to 16, MOE + or - 3%


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. With the current Democratic leaders they will get what they want
Another example of how dumb Americans can be.

Randomly Selected? from the most conservative sections of the country maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope not - and even with the numbers shown - and the MOE - there isn't
any call for action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acryliccalico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Never intend to play nice.
They set the standard so NO I do not intend to play nice. EVER!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, it's kinda like
I've already sucker-punched you, kicked you in the face, and humiliated you, but now I need some help, so could we play nice?

WRONG!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. That really pisses me off.
I am "the public", my liberal friends & family are "the public" & most everyone here on DU are "the public". Most of us don't want the Dem's to "play nice" we want them to get off their ass's & fight for us for a change.
Or is that just me????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acryliccalico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No it's not just you
We want the Dems to get up off their asses and do their JOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC