Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why didn't the Republican Senators have any questions for Rice ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:23 PM
Original message
why didn't the Republican Senators have any questions for Rice ?
Chafee did and Lugar did a bit also. but the rest just seemed to sit up there like a bunch of clueless asses. i know they were going to vote to confirm her anyways but don't they at least have any interest in what she plans to do ? they didn't even seem to defend her.

yesterday Norm Coleman performed his job as being the suck up but someone said during the breaks and after the hearings Condi seemed to totally ignore Coleman as if he is nobody important and he probably didn't like it which could explain his lack of defending her this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Chafee! Did he ask her
any embarrassing questions? I can't imagine anything she's done as not being embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. transcript
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: It seems to be a hypocritical approach to our foreign policy in some ways, in particular how we deal with some of those democracies such as Russia, Senator Biden said, uneven or undemocratic or some of the Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, even Musharraf, President Musharraf, and then on the other hand have a completely different view of, say, Iran, as Senator Biden was saying. It seems to magnify our differences on one hand and on the other hand, we magnify our similarities. In particular after having just come back from South America and meeting with President Chavez. Here he has gone before his people, high, high turnout. Just had a referendum, and as one of the people from our embassy said, they cleaned their clocks and kicked their butts. It seems to me to say derogatory things about him may be disrespectful to him, but also to the Venezuelan people. How do you react to that?

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Well, I have nothing but good things to say about the Venezuelan people. They are a remarkable people, and if you notice, Senator Chafee, I was not making derogatory comments, I was simply recognizing that there are unhelpful and unconstructive trends going on in Venezuelan policies. This is not personal.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: And there aren’t in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan --

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: And we --

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: -- and Russia and --

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: And we speak out about those.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: Pakistan?

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: We speak out about those as well, but some of this is a matter of trend lines and where countries have been, and where they are now going.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: Are their governments unconstructive?

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Well, the Russian government is not unconstructive in a lot of areas. It's quite constructive in many areas. It's been more constructive on Iran in recent years. It is constructive on -- to a certain extent in trying to deal with the kind of Nunn-Lugar issues that we have talked about. It's been constructive in Afghanistan. It's constructive on a number of areas, but that doesn't excuse what is happening inside Russia where the concentration of power in the Kremlin, to the detriment of other institutions, is a real problem. And we will continue to speak to the Russians. I think we do have to remember that it is also not the Soviet Union. The Russians have come quite a long way from where the Soviet Union was, and we need to always keep that in mind when we judge current policies, but where they're going is simply not very good. It is something to be deeply concerned about, and we will speak out. Countries are going to move at different speeds on this democracy test. I don't think there's any doubt about that. But what we have to do is that we have to keep the agenda -- keep this item on the agenda. We have to continue to press countries about it. We have to support democratic forces and civil society forces wherever we can. I would just note that Ukraine, I visited in 2001, not long after I had become National Security Adviser, and I frankly when this happened in Ukraine was pretty stunned by how effective civil society was and how effective the Ukrainian people were in making their voices known. Some of that is because we and the E.U. and others have spent time developing civil society, developing political opposition, working with people, not to have a specific candidate in any of these countries, but to have a political process that's open. And we have to do more of that. We're going to spend some $43 million this year, I believe that's the number, on Russian institutions, trying to help the development of civil society there. We need to do more of that kind of thing, because while we put it on an agenda, while we confront the governments that are engaged in non-democratic activities, we also have to help the development of civil society in opposition.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: You and Senator Boxer were having a little bit of a debate over credibility, and to me, it seems as though trust is built with consistency. Is it possible for you to say something positive about the Chavez administration?

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: It's pretty hard, Senator, to find something positive. Let me say this.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: I don’t understand that, after Tajikistan --

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Let me say this.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: -- Pakistan, Russia. It seems as though, as I say, magnifying our differences to some countries and magnifying our similarities with others. And as I said, I think trust is built with consistency, and I don't see consistency in some of your comments.

CONDOLEEZZA RICE: The state of behavior in the western hemisphere, the sate of affairs in the western hemisphere, is such that we have had democratic revolutions in all of these places, and we don't want to see them go back. We have some places where the democratic revolution is still to take place. We just have to understand that there are differences in that regard. But I have said, we hope that the government of Venezuela will continue to recognize what has been a mutually beneficial relationship on energy and that we can continue to pursue that. We certainly hope that we can continue to pursue counter-drug activities in the Andean region, and Venezuela participates in that. But I have to say that for the most part, the activities of the Venezuelan government in the last couple of years have been pretty unconstructive.

SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: Well, thank you very much. I'll go back to what I said earlier. It seems disrespectful to the Venezuelan people. They have spoken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. thanks for the transcript
it reminded me that another reason why I despise that viperous kindofsleezey rice is that she has diarrhea of the mouth. Her debating tactic is to run the clock out without actually saying anything. Somebody should do the world a favor and surgically remove her tongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. EWUWEEEEEEE!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Hot Damn! Ask and ye shall get!
Thank you,cestpaspossible!

Whoa! That's as good as any Dem could get ..love it!

Right on, Chafee! I guess he sees through that con ricehead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Chafee will switch to independent if he can pull a "Jeffords"
meaning if his switch could turn control over to Democrats.

so we need to focus on 2006 and hopefully we can at least get a split.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Chafee is a man of principle
& he sees through all the B.S.

He voted against the Iraq War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rubber stamping sycophants with no vision other than to keep
themselves in power are like that. No questions, everything's fine....can't we cut some more taxes and invade some new countries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. they are not patriotic and do not care about America eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miss_kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. They knew she's just gonna lie to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Follow the LEADER or
discontinue! That has been the continuous program! If you doubt you are out! That is what makes it a REGIME! If she had responded to any question with honesty, she herself would be gone, so no honest questions please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hagel is going to run for President
Has to make sure not to offend the base (must have been galling for him to just sit there on his hands and not say much -- he's a smart guy -- knows what a mess Bush has made of everything)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I didn't see Hagel's questions, but I heard
he asked pretty tough questions on Iraq.

Anyone know if this is so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. he asked
what exactly would be considered "success" in Iraq and about plans after the Iraq elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. # 1 How could they defend her, really?
and, #2, maybe they don't want to say anything nice on the record. Oh, and #3. If they can't say anything nice, maybe best to say nothing at all, so you don't fall out of line and get in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. They were too busy telling
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 10:06 PM by EC
her how great she was. Or setting her up to give positive answers..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. They were busy wiping Smirk jizz off their mouths ...
n/t

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC