Repug machine keeps chugging, DNC remains silent

[paineinthearse]

One must admire the RNC's thoroughness and omnipresence. They are always on top or even ahead of the spin. Why aren't we seeing an organized reply from DNC headquarters. Is it because they are vacationing? Or just plain spineless.

===========================================================

What They're Saying: President Bush's Inaugural Address; Reaction Round-up from the RNC

1/21/2005 12:18:00 PM


---------------------------------------------------------------------

To: National Desk

Contact: Brian Jones of Republican National Committee, 202-863-8614

WASHINGTON, Jan. 21 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following round-up of media reaction to President Bush's inaugural address was released today by the Republican National Committee:

Editorials And Op-Eds:

The Wall Street Journal: "Not Since JFK In 1960 Has An American President Provided Such An Ambitious And Unabashed Case For The Promotion Of Liberty At Home And Abroad." (Editorial, "Liberty Bell Ringer," The Wall Street Journal, 1/21/05)

David Broder, The Washington Post: Called The Speech, "Brief But Eloquent..." (David S. Broder, Op-Ed, "Big Goals, Unshakable Faith," The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

-- Broder: "(O)ne Essential Truth We Have Learned About Bush: His Faith That The Quest For Freedom Is A Universal Truth, Rooted In Human Nature And Intended By God." (David S. Broder, Op-Ed, "Big Goals, Unshakable Faith," The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

William Safire, The New York Times: "I Rate It Among The Top 5 Of The 20 Second-Inaugurals In Our History. Lincoln's Profound Sermon 'With Malice Toward None' Is Incomparable, But Bush's Second Was Better Than Jefferson's Mean-Spirited Pouting At 'The Artillery Of The Press.'" (William Safire, Op-Ed, "Bush's 'Freedom Speech,'" The New York Times, 1/21/05)

USA Today: "When George W. Bush Was Inaugurated For The First Time Four Years Ago, He Devoted Only Seven Sentences To Foreign Policy. Thursday, A More Seasoned And Confident Bush Delivered A Stirring Inaugural Call To The Longstanding American Ideal Of Spreading Freedom And Democracy Around The Globe." (Editorial, "Bush Shares A Stirring Vision. Now, How To Apply It?" USA Today, 1/21/05)

Los Angeles Times: "His Second Inaugural Address Was That Of A Large Man Indeed, Eloquently Weaving The Big Themes Of His Presidency And His Life Into A Coherent Philosophy And A Bold Vision Of How He Wants This Country To Spend The Next Four Years." (Editorial, "No Country Left Behind," Los Angeles Times, 1/21/05)

New York Post: "President Bush Stood Tall Before America And The World Yesterday And Marked The Beginning Of His Second Term With An Affirmation Of Liberty That Will Resonate For Years To Come." (Editorial, "Bush's 2nd Inaugural," New York Post, 1/21/05)

John Harris, The Washington Post: "(T)he 21-Minute Address He Delivered At The Capitol Yesterday Was Startling In Its Reach." (John F. Harris, Op-Ed, "An Ambitious President Advances His Idealism," The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

-- Harris: "His Pledges To Promote Liberty And Aid The Oppressed, Along With Predictions Of The United States Leading The World To The Ultimate Triumph Of Democracy Over Tyranny In Every Land, Were Issued With Some Of The Most Expansive And Lyrical Language Bush Has Summoned." (John F. Harris, Op-Ed, "An Ambitious President Advances His Idealism," The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

Dallas Morning News: "The President, Exuding Both Gravity And Confidence, Was Indisputably Presidential. His Speech Embodied Everything That Makes Him The Leader He Is: Unembarrassed Religious Faith, Moral Certitude, Persistence, Determination And Self-Assuredness." (Editorial, "Values-Laden Vision: Bush Shines As He Delivers Second-Term Ideals," The Dallas Morning News, 1/21/05)

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: "President George W. Bush Delivered An Eloquent, Idealistic Second Inaugural On Thursday That Was An Ode To America's Special Role In Promoting Freedom Around The World." (Editorial, "Bush's Second Inaugural: Ode To Freedom," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 1/21/05)

The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer: "In A Scant 21 Minutes, Bush Delivered What May Have Been The Speech Of His Presidency, A Thematic Symphony Keyed To The Unalienable Rights Of People - The Same Truths This Nation's Founders Held To Be Self-Evident." (Editorial, "Bush's Call To Freedom," The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, 1/21/05)

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: "George W. Bush's Second Inaugural Address, Given In A Time Of War And Doubt, Was An Inspiring Call For Selflessness And Sacrifice. It Was A Call For Americans To Advance The Cause Of Freedom From Tyranny Worldwide." (Editorial, "A New Bush Doctrine?" Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/21/05)

Pundits:

NBC's Tim Russert: "Well-Crafted, Well-Delivered. The Themes Of Freedom And Liberty ... I Thought The Call To National Service Will Resonate With All Americans - Democrats, Republicans, Independents." (NBC's, "Special Coverage Of The 55th Inaugural," 1/20/05)

CBS News' Bob Schieffer Said Speech Was "Eloquent And The Rhetoric Lofty." (CBS' "Evening News With Dan Rather," 1/20/05)

ABC News' George Will: "It's Not Just The Survival Of Liberty He's About. He Is About The Expansion Of Liberty Into Every Nook And Crevasse Of The Planet." (ABC's "Inaugural Coverage," 1/20/05)

Howard Fineman, Newsweek: Called The Address "Powerful. I Think It Is The Biggest Statement Of American Purpose In The World Of Any President I Can Think Of. It Is Woodrow Wilson On Steroids. It's Big." (MSNBC's "Hardball," 1/20/05)

Dick Morris, Former Aide To President Clinton: "Was The Greatest (Inaugural Address) ... Since John F. Kennedy's And One Of The Five Or Sixth Greatest Of All Time. It Was Beautiful, It Was Poetic. ... And It Articulated A Bold New Doctrine For American Policy. It Was A Very Substantive Speech." (Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor," 1/20/05)

------

Paid for by the Republican National Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

http://www.usnewswire.com/

[hang a left]

1. Well......

If the DNC can't I am sure we can.

[itzamirakul]

2. We are not hearing from the DNC because

they agree with all of the above..There is not one bone of contention among them (members of DNC/DLC). Yet, we keep getting letters from them asking for money....FOR WHAT?

[cthrumatrix]

3. becuase the DNC is owned by the same people - corporations

who profit from war and financial espionage of other countries and their resources.

Read the book "Confessions of an Economic Hitman"

[John_H]

4. Our child-consultants at work!

What are you trying to say? That the 23 year olds at the DNC just cant compete with the RNC thugs? Nonsense!! Our people went to Ivy League schools! They came very highly reccomended from their friends who worked for Gore! Perhaps you're just mistaking move 13a-146 in the Judo Chess handbook for inaction. This move is a classic. You let the GOP slap you around for many years, thus lulling them into a false sense of domination. Then, when they control all branches of government by seemingly insurmountable margins, you pounce...

[moggie12]

5. LOL -- Although I really should cry because it's so true

apparently, they're not going to "pounce" until Bush blows up the world

[moggie12]

6. Utterly pathetic -- the DNC is pretty much useless

I only pray that someone like Dean can shake it up and make them effective.

It's not like they don't have a load of negative reaction to Bush's speech to cite. This is just a partial list:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1519184&mesg_id=1519184

What a bunch of maroons.....