Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why all this talk about "democracy" in Iraq from war opponents?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 03:59 PM
Original message
Why all this talk about "democracy" in Iraq from war opponents?
Why have the so-called elections in Iraq generated a bipartisan, thesaurus-exhausting orgy of lofty rhetoric about Iraqi "Democracy" even from people who opposed the war?

Have all of the people "welcoming" the elections(such as every Dem senators on the morning shows today) really bought the bridge? Do they really believe that chimp and the rest of the neocons give a shit about democracy?

I can't believe people opposed to the war are going to let chimp off the hook. They know damn well that this election is about cutting and running, about clearing the micrometer high validity-hurdle set by the U.S. media. Then the Iraqi "government," with a wink and a nod, will ask the US to leave in a timely manner, which will render harmless all of the past chaos, all of the death and suffering. Any future death, chaos, and suffering will be the Iraqi government's problem.

The media will, of course, sell the departure as mission accomplished. And it certainly will have been--after all, the companies run by the bush family's cronies will control the oil that 1300 Americans have died for.

Oh, and a new made-for-TV Democracy will have been born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ashmanonar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. made-for-tv democracy!
reminds me of an incubus song....

incubus, by the way, are AWESOME. they're more critical of bush than most POLITICIANS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think its due to moral cowardice
and a complete lack of conviction. And this is with benefit of doubt. AFterall legistators need to keep their jobs and collaborate to sustain the myths that got us into this mess in the first place.
I can only think this will come back to haunt us - even as the oil thrashes home to us in the VLCC and ULCC tankers. Enjoy it while you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't believe people opposed to the war are going to let chimp off the
hook<<

American senators might... but Russia, Germany, France, Spain, and dozens of others may not.


http://www.gnc.com/health_notes/newswire/default.aspx?article_id=3&doc_id=247&lang=en
Low Iron Linked to ADHD

By Kimberly Beauchamp, ND

Healthnotes Newswire (January 13, 2005)—Iron deficiency may worsen the symptoms of attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and supplementing with iron may increase the body’s iron stores and decrease the condition’s severity, reports the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (2004;158:1113–5).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theresistance Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah its pretty frustrating
It had to have been part of the reason Bush "won" the election. So many people had a softly-softly, wishy washy opposition to the war, instead of coming out directly and opposing it. But don't forget, even the United Nations and the countries that opposed the war have swallowed it all down - the Security Council has already passed several resolutions virtually condoning and approving the war (supporting the puppet regime America has created and the ongoing occupation). America just seems to get its way and people have short memories etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. they have no intention of leaving

Iraq is the neoclown mideast base of operations. Iran and Syria are next. Whoever 'wins' the 'election' will ask our forces to stay in order to 'maintain stability'.

As for your other point, the Democrats in congress are, for the most part, spineless, gutless, connivers who rationalize their support for imperialist conquest by deluding themselves that they are smarter than the rethuglicans and aren't going to fall for the trap of opposing our aggression in Iraq.

Nor will they say anything negative as we start up with Iran or Syria.

There is in fact nothing wrong with having democracy in Iraq, heck I wouldn't mind a little back here at home. But you don't get there by invading a country, sacking its cities, killing all who oppose your behavior, and then running deliberately obscure and confusing elections under the complete control of the same armed forces that invaded the country and is busy killing the opposition.

The Democratic Leadership should be pointing our that this election is a farce and that it is already a failure. Instead they've allowed the thugs to define success as 'an iraqi somewhere on the planet voted without being shot and killed', and haven't said one word about how utterly bogus this all is.

Eight days from now our Democratic Leaders will be lining up to announce what a Great Day it is now that Iraq has democracy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Nope. They absolutely can't wait to leave.
They're evil, to be sure, but not stupid. They know as well as if not better than we do that Iraq is a disaster, that it becomes more of a political liability every day, and that the war has already served both its purposes, which were getting chimp reelected and putting his buddies in control of a huge percentage of the world's oil. They also know that leaving will earn the media's praise for Bush the peacemaker's "ending the war."

To say that they're going to do Iran and Syria next is to buy into the laughable notion that the neocons really do want to spread democracy and security. Iraq was about electoral votes, revenge, and above all money; Syria and Iran have no upside at all.

Plus, Rove knows Iran is not doable, even if the neocons at the DOD do not.

We'll just have to see how it shakes out, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I guess we will just have to wait and see

Have you read seymour hersch's latest article in the new yorker? It is starting to be confirmed by other sources, and his claim is that the war against Iran has in fact already started through covert operations, that the level of delusion among the neoclowns is pretty complete, and that they have no intention of backing down or changing course. Oh, and covert operations have mostly all been moved out of any organizations under congressional oversight and into the DOD under rummy where they can operate off the books and out of any control other than the administration.

If the administration were changing course it would not have promoted the neoclown hawks and sent the semi-rational moderates packing.

It isn't about democracy or wmd and never was. It is about oil and world domination. The neoclowns are playing the Big Game, going for the brass ring, they want the whole enchilada. Their fundy allies want armageddon. Nice mix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not All Democrats. here's Clark:
ZAHN: And I'm going to let you answer your own question there briefly. Do you think all of those things will happen, yes or no?
CLARK: I think we'll -- I think we'll get a pretty good turnout in the election. I think there will be a lot violence. And I think after the election, there will still be violence.
ZAHN: That's the last time you'll ask yourself a question, General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. I would like to be wrong
Intellectually I know Shrub and the neo-cons are about as in favor of true democracy as Torquemada would have supported a human rights treaty banning torture of heretics.

beleivng in democracy means conceding that somebody you don't like may get elected. That the people of a country may choose a course outsiders don't like (and as long as the elections can be trusted to be the true will of the people, that the majority does not oppress the minority... we should accept as democracy. even if we disagree. ) If the iraqis could choose whomever they wanted and determine thier own fate, it is likley they would't' choose a pro-american canidate or honor all the changes to thier government that the neo-cons have pushed through.

It's not as if the US gov has never toppled a democracy or three before.

BUT I would like to be wrong. I would like the situation in Iraq to stabilize. I would like the killing to stop.


Intellectually I know it ain't going to happen. That the war will never achive it's "stated" purpose.

But I would like to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Most of our government approves of the illegal war in Iraq. They are
accomplices now and discovery of their "help" in a court of law could prove hazardous to their health, so to speak. They want to steal the oil.

Same with 9-11...most are accomplices to the greatest US government crime in our history. They are NOT going to spill the beans or upset the apple cart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC