Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So how many time did Condi commit Perjury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:53 PM
Original message
So how many time did Condi commit Perjury
in her Senate testimony last week?

Perjury

1. Law. The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath.

2. The breach of an oath or promise.


Remember that game "find the hidden picture". Let's play "find the blatant perjuries". Each perjury counts has one year in prison for Condi. Good luck!



Complete transcript from Rice's Senate Confirmation hearing last week"

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/politics/18TEXT-RICE.html?ex=1106802000&en=fb4afff7b77ae83b&ei=5070


Biden's questioning:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/politics/18TEXT-RICE.html?pagewanted=19&ei=5070&en=fb4afff7b77ae83b&ex=1106802000


Boxer's questioning:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/18/politics/18TEXT-RICE.html?pagewanted=49&ei=5070&en=fb4afff7b77ae83b&ex=1106802000















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's one of the ones Boxer brought up
"The fact is that we did face a very difficult intelligence challenge in trying to understand what Saddam Hussein had in terms of weapons of mass destruction."

What happened to the mushroom clouds? I remember distinctly she told the country that we couldn't wait for Saddam to give us an answer. We had to go to war now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. #2 - We went to war, not because of aluminum tubes
That is something that Charlie Duelfer, in his report of the Iraq Survey Group, has made very clear: that Saddam Hussein intended to continue his weapons of mass destruction activities, that he had laboratories that were run by his security services. I could go on and on. But, Senator Boxer, we went to war, not because of aluminum tubes.


How many times did they tell us that the tubes were proof Saddam was developing WMD's?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Even though it was blatantly obvios
That the tubes could not be used as nuclear refinement centrifuges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. #3 - Here's a real whopper
And, yes, we thought that he was -- that he had stockpiles, which he did not have. We had problems with the intelligence. We are all, as a collective polity of the United States, trying to deal with ways to get better intelligence. But it wasn't just weapons of mass destruction. He was also a place -- his territory was a place where terrorists were welcomed...


Al Zaqawari was supposedly in Northern Iraq, which was under Kurd control and a US no fly zone. We claimed al Qaeda had a chem plant there, yet we refused to bomb or attack it. Instead we claimed that this proved Saddam had ties to al Qaeda, when it was the US that was protecting the camp.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. How many times were her lips moving?
That would be my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC