Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rant: Can we please stop refighting the primaries already?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:01 AM
Original message
Rant: Can we please stop refighting the primaries already?
As someone who enjoys coming to DU, doing alot of reading and a little posting, I've noticed in recent weeks alot of flamethrowing between supporters of the various former presidential candidates. You know what I mean. Someone will start a thread about one of the former candidates--usually positive. Somewhere along the line the thread will degenerate into things like "Dean is not a liberal", "Clark is a Republican", "Kucinich is the only true progressive", "Kerry was a lousy candidate", "Clark would have beaten Bush", "No, Dean would have beaten Bush" and so on and so on and so on. It's the same old crap over and over again.

This is nuts folks. The primaries are history. Analyzing what happened and trying to learn from events is one thing but flinging the same baseless assumptions out over and over again is not productive.



What's really amazing is that there's nothing that I've seen in any of these former candidate's public statements that would make them the leader of an angry mob planning to rip other candidates to shreds.

Dean got screwed, true, he's also gotten over it and became one of Kerry's strongest defenders during the general election, founded DFA and helped get Democrats elected around the country and is now a leading contender for DNC chair.

Clark got used, and then dropped, true, but he's become a major foreign policy and defense policy spokesman for the Democrats and one of the few progressives who can articulate these issues in an authoritative way.

Kerry was robbed, true, and he disappointed many by conceding the election so quickly. Since then, he's been slowly but surely finding his voice and I think in the next few months will emerge as a major spokesman for progressives.

Kucinich was ignored, true but he's still speaking out and that's a good thing.

My point is that these guys are all on the same team. Sure there's differences between them on the issues but they're all rather close compared to the Republicans. Also, all of the Democrats who ran for the nomination in the last election are human--that means they are not perfect. Shall I list a few of their faults; Kerrys indeciciveness, Dean's occaisional brain to mouth disconnect, Clark's inexperience in matters political, Kucinich's seeming disconnect from political reality (I love that about him, by the way)--all of these faults pale in comparison to Bush's faults of arrogance, cruelty and dishonesty.

By attacking each other and harping on the differences in political purity, we are acting like the very caricature of liberals that the right wing loves to promote.

I am donning my asbestos suit and signing off now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let me guess
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 07:07 AM by TrueAmerican
You were a Kerry man/gal all the way.

Well, we tried to tell ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually I was largely undecided between Dean and Kerry
I donated to both candidates. I had admired Kerry going back to the Iran Contra days but was put off by his support for the Iraq war. I liked what Dean was saying but was a little cautious about his lack of foreign policy experience and as I mentioned--occaisional disconnect between brain and mouth.

In the end I would have voted for Dean had he been on the ballot in New Jersey. I thought that his behavior in defeat showed that he had a great deal of character.

I'll admit I did not appreciate Clark at the time but since then have developed a real appreciation of his knowledge of the issues particularly as regards foreign policy and military affairs.

I don't do hero worship of politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, you should of went with Clark
That what my gut said and it was right. And I tried to tell people, but it fell on death ears. Maybe next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. I STILL believe in 'Joementum' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. So you're new to the Democratic party?
This is business as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Actually, no. I'm well aware of the traditional circular firing squad
My point is that in the last few weeks it seems to have gotten worse than usual at least here. Maybe it's because Dean's running for DNC and maybe it's because we're all tired and pissed off. I don't know. I'll admit I didn't start coming to DU until the primaries were pretty much over so I missed alot of the infighting.

Obviously it's hard for some people to let go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who is Clark?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Glad the conciliatory tone of the thread is overcoming all
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 09:10 AM by robbedvoter
And it's why "can't we just get along" will never work.:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. I agree, we need to move on to more important issues today ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for your thoughtful post, and I agree.
Time to move on, not rehash coulda/shoulda/woulda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TOhioLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. No flames here...
I agree whole-heartedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC