orleans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 06:52 PM
Original message |
Vote for Randi Rhodes on this poll on aol |
funkybutt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message |
caledesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message |
Ivote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I was hunting for it. Done. :kick:
|
orleans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
that must be why she was getting so many freaky calls today from so many kool-aid drinking weirdos
|
lady lib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
5. We need more thumbs up for Randi |
|
There's a little test your knowledge quiz also (ahem, I scored 6 out of 6 - a few lucky guesses there!)
|
AlwaysDemocrat
(326 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
8. the poll has Franken on it now |
sherilocks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. You can vote for Franken |
|
Rhodes, and Springer, one at a time. Use the horizontal arrows. Click on vote.
|
Andromeda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-27-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
orleans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-28-05 01:45 AM
Response to Original message |
11. give a thumbs up vote for randi |
|
limballs and hanity are too far ahead of her
vote for al and then arrow over and vote for randi
they're still taking votes--apparently if you check back later you can vote a second time (not that i would ever do something like that.....hehe)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |