Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush Whores, How Much Propaganda is Enough for America?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 02:34 AM
Original message
The Bush Whores, How Much Propaganda is Enough for America?
<It started with a fellow named Armstrong Williams. Mr. Williams was a relatively popular conservative commentator on both radio and TV. When Bush carved the school vouchers out of his new “No Child Left Behind” back in 2001, Armstrong Williams was none to pleased and said that “Mr. Bush scooped out the soul of his own education proposal." Pretty harsh language but soon, Mr. Williams changed his tune. In fact, he eventually became one of the champion’s of the NCLB legislation. What changed his mind you ask? One would be logical to conclude that it would be the $240,000 payoff he received from the administration to tout the law, that changed his mind. Once he received this payola, Mr. Armstrong commented in his weekly article a numerous occasions the value of the very bill he demeaned just a few years earlier. Of course, he also never revealed to his readers that he had been paid off, permanently ruining his ethical reputation.

If this was an isolated incident, it would be frightening enough, but this week it has been revealed that Armstrong Williams is only the tip of the propaganda iceberg. He only represents one opinion Bush is trying to buy from you. Next up this week was a woman named Maggie Gallagher. Ms. Gallagher is a syndicated columnist who may have violated the law in promoting the Bush marriage initiatives to Congress, without revealing she had been paid by Bush to promote those initiatives. Did you get that America? In 2002 and 2003, Ms. Gallagher received over $40,000 from the Bush administration to pimp their vision of marriage as the panacea for all social welfare problems. On September 4, 2003 and again on March 3, 2004, Maggie Gallagher appeared before Congress as a witness for the Majority (GOP) during the Federal Marriage Amendment. At those hearings it appears that Ms. Gallagher did not bother to inform Congress of the fact that her opinion had been bought. It is unclear at this point if this was technically a federal violation of law or a violation of Congress.

Let’s walk through this again. Ms. Gallagher was paid $40,000 by the Bush administration to tout its marriage initiatives. From that point on she began to promote the initiatives in her columns extensively. These columns graced the pages of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post, among others. She was also paid to complete a report entitled, “Can Government Strengthen Marriage?” Considering she was paid tens of thousands of dollars, I am going to guess her answer was “yes”. Then, because she had now written so much about the subject, she was called as an expert witness before Congress when they were deciding whether to fund the 300 million dollar “marriage promotion initiatives”. The problem is that she did not tell Congress that she had already received over $40,000 in payola to push the same initiatives she was now pretending to be an “expert” on.

When she was busted this week her comment was, “I should have disclosed a government contract when I later wrote about the Bush marriage initiative. I would have, if I had remembered it”. I don’t know about you, but I forget people who hand me $40,000 every day, don’t you? This excuse is so preposterous that while Ms. Gallagher may play an expert on marriage before Congress, she is obviously divorced from reality. .

So, we have yet another example of George Bush taking your tax money, buying a media opinion, to then try and convince you (and Congress in this case) about a plan he knows won’t float on it’s own. Are you outraged yet? Are you disgusted yet? If not, let’s discuss Michael McManus.>

http://www.opednews.com/wade_012905_bush_whores.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, don't forget William Kristol and Krauthammer...
shamelessly plugging the coronation speech on any cable news channel that would have them! Wonder why they forgot to mention that they were paid and wrote parts of that demonic rhetoric! Kristol did an Op Ed in the Weekly Standard! Krauthammer is often a guest on Fox, as well as Kristol! No ethics whatsoever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. They're also taking $$$ from right-wing think tanks.
Media Matters has exposed this. See their website www.mediamatters.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. all the major right wing players have a connection
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 03:36 PM by JI7
the think tanks, big money guys, pundits etc are all connected to one another.

this is different from liberal groups in that there are wealthy democrats , and there is air america radio, and there are people like carville, but they are many times independent of one another.

the right winger machine is very connected and dependent on each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. big difference, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC