Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huh, * isn't going to like the results of the Iraqi election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:36 PM
Original message
Huh, * isn't going to like the results of the Iraqi election
The Shites are way ahead....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Plenty of time for a recount
and boxes and boxes of undiscovered ballots showing up in a back room of Abu Ghraib.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Actually not Abu Ghraib, but yeah, boxes of ballots are showing up
and of course surpression didn't only happen in Ohio...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. How soon until
we get them their very own Diebold, ESS, Sequoia (who else am I forgetting) machines? Then we can be really certain they are choosing their own government. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Triad...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Of course!
*smacks self upside the head* Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. All they elected was a bunch of folks to supposedly write a Constitution.
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 08:42 PM by w4rma
The government isn't going to change for at least 11 months after they start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theresistance Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've made this point on other threads
There's still at least another year of occupation before even a government is created, but we are supposed to celebrate "sovereignty". These facts are conveniently not mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. It'll take more than a year, they'll time it for the 2006 elections...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yes, but their Constitution is going to be their rule of law and
governmental set-up and they really didn't want a theocracy like Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NGU Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Guess they can't rig paper ballots too well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, since they're a majority of the country.
I'm not overly concerned even the clerical party wins. It's going to be a fairly Muslim-friendly state.

The questions they're giving the right answers to--or lipservice at least--are how well they'll play with others. Whether Sunni or Xian
(etc.), Arab or Kurd. Do they realize that democracies are inherently evil unless they're tempered by respect for minorities?

We'll see. But we always knew that we'd have to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, and it's the party backed by Sistani
The Ayotallah Sistani is WAY smarter than the Bush folks - guess who's going to be running the country, W? That's the problem with democracy.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. That's why Sistani asked for the elections...
of course * appointed Alawi (sp?) PM even though he came in 16th...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. If the election results in war...
Blivet** will do the antler dance naked in joy.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC