Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Edwards is for the "Little Guy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:00 PM
Original message
If Edwards is for the "Little Guy"
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 05:03 PM by HFishbine
why did he vote for a bill that makes it harder to declare bankruptcy while Kerry voted against it?

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00236#position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which bill? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry
Link added to original post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckeye1 Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ask him.
How would anyone here know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. For all the reasons we've discussed before:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=99819

mbali's post 17:

mbali  (598 posts)

Sun Jan-11-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #8

17. This was far more complicated - and less damning - than made to appear ...

Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 10:41 AM by mbali





Edwards voted for the Senate version of the bill, but there's more to the story.

Edwards joined most Democrats, including Kerry, Schumer, Wellstone, etc. in attaching an amendment, authored by Wellstone himself, that made the Senate version much harsher on the banking industry and easier on individual debtors. At that point, it became a judgment call whether to vote for the bill or against it since voting for it, with the amendment, would force the bill to conference and increase the likelihood that it would die in conference or that conference would produce a version more favorable to individuals than it otherwise would have been. The odds of this were excellent since Leahy, Kennedy, Feingold, Schumer, Durbin were among the Democratic conferees. The banking industry and corporate interests hated this version, by the way.

And, yes, Kerry, Wellstone and 14 other Democrats voted against final passage. But all of the other Democrats, including Clinton, Cleland and Edwards, voted for final passage, largely because they knew that the version the Dems had forced would probably eventually scuttle the bill. And it has. The bill died at the end of the 107th Congress.

It's important to know all of the facts before condemning anyone for one particular vote. Senate procedure and strategy is extremely complicated and just looking at a yea or nay does not always tell the story. That's why it is sometimes misleading to try to characterize anyone's motives or views just by looking at one vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bottom line: Bush controls all branches of gov't and this bill isn't law
and the credit cards don't have the profit-protection bill Bush promised them. So whatever they did seems to have worked to protect Americans even though Dems' only power in government today is through the few procedural strategies they can exercise thanks to the fact that Republicans don't have a super-majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. This didn't pass?
I thought it was signed into law. What happened to it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I guess
Kerry, who voted against it (along with Kennedy, Fiengold and others) didn't see the wisdom of Edwards' approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah, Edwards helped write a bill they knew would never get of the Senate
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 05:26 PM by AP
and he votes for it (with the poison pills he helped put in it) because he doesn't want commercials running in NC telling the thousands of bank employees that he voted AGAINST YOUR JOBS, and that makes, who? Dean? a better candidate?

NC is going to be a tight state that Edwards could win. Get all Gore's states, loose FL, and win NC and you have a Dem president.

Bush is allowed to do stuff like this to win PA and OH, but we're going to try to convince people Edwards is bank whore over this?

Do you have ONE other piece of evidence to corrroborate the claim that he's a bank whore?

Like, does he say on the stump that he thinks more debt is GOOD for people (which is what Dean said with his education plan)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Why defend this shitty vote?
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 10:55 PM by flaminbats
It's bad enough when you have a health problem, and don't even have any money to pay your debts. But at least these people usually have the option of declaring bankruptcy!

But now Edwards wants to keep the ball and chain around the kidney dialysis patient or the cancer patient,"work ya cripple or else we'll take every fucking thing you earned in life!"

Ahhh yes, no health-care, no more protections under the bankruptcy laws..but loads of our tax dollars for the Iraqis and corporate America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because caring for "little people" is the oldest election ploy in the...
book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. ...and I have yet to see a SINGLE piece of evidence that Edwards
hasn't put the interests of people who work for a living first.

Pretending that he is a whore for the banks (a guy who doesn't take any PAC money, a guy whom NC bank lobbyists have said rarely answered their calls before 2002 and never answers them now, and a guy who attacks predatory ledning and outrageous debt loads on Americans) is just shooting yourself in the foot when it comes time to vote for someone who ACTUALLY is running on the promise to give you back the economic power Bush is stealing from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nazgul35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. good question.....
why not put it too the test.....

As discussed in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=160592

both Kerry and Edwards have the opportunity to lead the Dems in a filibuster against the spending bill that has the overtime changes attached as a rider.....

The news is reporting that the Dems are not going to be able to stop it.....

My qeustion is that if these two men want to lead this party, here is a perfect chance to show all of us just what kind of leadership they possess......get the Dems to stop it....

Get in Bush's face now and I guarantee you that the one who does will win the nomination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. umm...yeah...
...he's just pretending to care about people that grow up just like he did and he was just pretending to care about all those people he went to court for...

:eyes:

Thanks AP for the real answer.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=157849#157924
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. NC is a big banking state. He'd be serving his constituency, the employees
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 05:23 PM by blm
of those institutions, I imagine. There are lots of regular workers employed there. Jobs matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Or See #4 above.
That seems more likely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. you bet Jobs matter!
and people will spend every damned cent they saved just to defeat cancer or any other life-threatening disease.


Jobs matter..and to the businessman every cent taken from the dieing patient is worth a hell of alot more than morality. Yes...not a good way to be elected, but it still has some value..

Divide and conquer...what a great Carl Rove strategy, divide the uninsured and the unemployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's for renewable energy too!
And he's for the little guy!

Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very Good Dem Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Your repeated attacks on Edwards would have a lot more credibility
if they were accurate. However, your posts are very misleading.

You're very good at telling half of the story when the whole story presents an entirely different picture.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC