Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ridiculous. More fake studies to justify the vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
2diagnosis Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:30 PM
Original message
Ridiculous. More fake studies to justify the vote
Kerry is Catholic!
This study from these guys- "Those are just a few of the insights to be gleaned from the Fourth National Survey of Religion and Politics, a project of the University of Akron that was underwritten by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life .."

"Among all evangelical Protestants, 78 percent voted for Bush, while 50 percent of all mainline Protestants voted for Bush. But among Hispanic Protestants, Bush garnered an amazing 63 percent of the vote. That’s 26 percentage points higher than the Republican Party identification (merely 37 percent) in that category. So Hispanics Protestants responded to the electoral choice more like Protestants than like Hispanics. Religion trumped ethnicity.

The same pattern was generally true for Hispanic Catholics. Although only 15 percent of Hispanic Catholics are Republican, 31 percent of them voted for Bush, doubling the GOP base." ...
http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/Pollsters/DavidHill/030905.html
"By breaking out non-Hispanic Catholics into a separate category, it is clear that Democrats are in more trouble with Catholics than some have suspected. Overall, 41 percent of non-Hispanic Catholics are Republicans and 44 are Democrats. But on Election Day, Bush beat Kerry 53 to 47 percent among those voters, doubtless picking up the lion’s share of independent white Catholics.

As we saw with Hispanics, Bush’s success among non-Hispanic Catholics derives from more than social issues. Only 39 percent of the non-Hispanic Catholic category described abortion and gay marriage as “very important” and just 19 percent said those social issues are more important than foreign policy or economic issues. So the appeal of Bush and Republicans to non-Hispanic Catholics, as well as to Hispanics, is broader and deeper than many have speculated." ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. The media keeps repeating that people who care about values vote for Bush.
Edited on Wed Mar-09-05 01:38 PM by blm
They have been pounding that meme for 6 years now.

That shorthand version of the entire issue is what most people have been fed by the GOPcontrolled media.

Unfortunately most of the public has no idea they are being spun and indoctrinated by the rightwing propagandists in the media. Regular folks tend to trust what they hear every day from the so-called "news" networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. bu$h has no values
That is were the media fails.
The are talking about nonexistent values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2diagnosis Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. media may be failing, but Hispanics are being
targeted for major propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do say its ridiculous?
Something has to justify the vote, do you have any info that this would discredit this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because it presumes the official numbers describe reality
Whereas we know from a number of credible sources--the lead one being Steve Freeman's excellent peer-reviewed analysis--that those official results are not credible. The anomalies they display cannot be explained in terms of random or methodological error, and Mitofsky's attempt at exculpatory 'explanation' is contradicted by his own data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. OK
So if this is not credible why do YOU think Democrats lose elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. "why do YOU think Democrats lose elections?"
You're assuming your conclusion. You haven't demonstrated yet that the 'losses' have been real/legitimate. I'm sure some have been, but, as Freeman et al. have shown, others (e.g. Bush's 'win') have not been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2diagnosis Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. If this is true, we need a strategy of getting people
to put religion out of the voting booth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BL611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I find that a reasonable assesment....
Far better then just calling something ridiculous because it is unpleasing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2diagnosis Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks, your validation is important to me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Get the undigested version here:
http://pewforum.org/docs/index.php?DocID=64 It's pdfed.

You can get the exact same thing from the Bliss Institute, which conducted the survey.
http://www.uakron.edu/bliss/research.php

Error is +/- 2% overall, but has to be higher for many subcategories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yep, Pew is on the giant conspiracy too!
Is that a black helicopter I see over there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC