of the primaries.
He came in late, when activists and many pols had already lined up behind a candidate. It's hard to walk away from a candidate that you may have invested money, time and research on.
Also remember that Clark doesn't have as strong a support base out there because the media has consistenly refused to cover him in a fair and honest way. They preferred writing smears and such during the primaries, because I don't believe it was in the corporate media's interest to have Bush run against like Clark, who in my mind would have been a harder candidate for Bush to beat.
There is no doubt about Clark inciting passion, both from those who know him, and from those consider him a threat to their guy/gal. From those who have admired his stands (when others were sitting), and those who distrust anything military. Dems have, to a great degree, been conditioned to be idealists or pragmatist. The beauty about Clark is that he offers both.
Bottomline is that Clark presents potential unlike many of the other choices. He offers a possibility for real change in this country, something that although many want, many fear.
I just re-read a thread in where Clark supporters detail why they support him. Tom posted it elsewhere, and I just happen to click on it. I made one of my very first post in that thread.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... The substance posted in the thread is key.