Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo's Pincus:Blair Was Told of WH Resolve to Use Military Against Hussein

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:41 AM
Original message
WaPo's Pincus:Blair Was Told of WH Resolve to Use Military Against Hussein
Edited on Fri May-13-05 07:48 AM by flpoljunkie
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201857.html

British Intelligence Warned Blair of War
Prime Minister Was Told of White House's Resolve to Use Military Against Hussein

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 13, 2005; A18

Seven months before the invasion of Iraq, the head of British foreign intelligence reported to Prime Minister Tony Blair that President Bush wanted to topple Saddam Hussein by military action and warned that in Washington intelligence was "being fixed around the policy," according to notes of a July 23, 2002, meeting with Blair at No. 10 Downing Street.

"Military action was now seen as inevitable," said the notes, summarizing a report by Richard Dearlove, then head of MI6, British intelligence, who had just returned from consultations in Washington along with other senior British officials. Dearlove went on, "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD . But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

"The case was thin," summarized the notes taken by a British national security aide at the meeting. "Saddam was not threatening his neighbours and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran."

The notes were first disclosed last week by the Sunday Times of London, triggering criticism of Blair on the eve of the May 5 British parliamentary elections that he had decided to support an invasion of Iraq well before informing the public of his views.

much more...worth reading in its entirety, including a revelation about Condi's "impatience with the U.N. route."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Massive parsing of...
....'fixed' going on.

Defenders of Chimpy McCokespoon claim that all it means is 'solidified', not 'ginned up out of thin air'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did you read the article, Davis_X_Machina. I suggest you do so. The man
Edited on Fri May-13-05 07:51 AM by flpoljunkie
is a long-time and great investigative reporter for the Washington Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. there is a thread in LBN about the wash post article

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing new here: invasion of Iraq & winning the 2004 election were moral
certainties anyone could have gleaned by carefully listening to what W said said in the months leading up to these events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC