Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why You Can't Catch Kerry in a Lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dreissig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:39 PM
Original message
Why You Can't Catch Kerry in a Lie
One of the geniuses at those brainy Massachusetts colleges must have figured it out for him. There's no way to catch John Kerry in a lie. He can tailor his presentation to any audience, and everything he says will be truthful. It's amazing.

The math is a bit tricky, so pay attention. Every Kerry action has two outcomes, the record and the report. For example, Kerry voted for the IWR, but his statements describing that vote are different from the record. Each mathematical "tree" has two branches, and each branch has two more branches, etc. If you are computer literate, you can see where this is headed. Each branch increases the number of outcomes by a power of two. Thus, sixteen Kerry actions can be interpreted a staggering number of ways. Don't look it up! Two to the 16th is a pretty big number - 20,000,000,000,000,000.

Kerry can get up in front of little old ladies and tell one story, then appear before the American Legion with a completely different story. And every one of these stories is true! This is a man who pays attention to his constituents. They wanted him to oppose the IWR, and he totally dissed it. He talked it down unmercifully! Don't nitpick that he actually voted for it, shame on you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I figured it was because
by the time he says two words, I'm asleep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreissig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Two Words, One Outcome
You must be using some data compression algorithm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why you can't catch Kerry on election day.
Because he's the real deal, the voters recognize that, and they want to vote for someone who leads by inspiring them, not by making them angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bingo, I look for Kerry/Clark style INSPIRATION, not....
Vermont Governor style anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. But, hey, just because people VOTE for Kerry, it doesn't mean
that they really wanted Kerry to BE the nominee!! Maybe they were just saying that they wanted him to be the nominee in order to pressure the UN into invading Iraq! I think we're going to have to listen a bit more closely to what the voters really want...they can be very nuanced, you know. These primaries are very complicated issues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sly Kal Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Touche`
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. You got that right!
I was sitting in a sales office yesterday afternoon. People were discussing HD. I have no idea what their party affiliation is - but the one thing they all agreed upon was that HD acted "like a crazy man" in Iowa. Most of them commented what a scarey idea it would be to have him president. Some said that they were embarrassed FOR him.

Voters don't typically pay attention until January and it's January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soj Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. If by '20,000,000,000,000,000'...
You mean '65,536'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreissig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exponentiation Operator
I assumed the exponentiation operator in MS Excel is a double asterisk, like it is elsewhere. Instead, it's a caret. 2^16 = 65,536.

Now I'm puzzled by what this 2**16 is. I should have gotten an error message.

I was about to draw a Pascal's Triangle of Kerry's positions but I was daunted by the huge number of possibilities. Maybe it's still possible to trap Kerry in a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ** = Mantissa Representation
First number = Mantissa
Second number = Exponent

So 2 ** 16 = 2 * 10^16

By the way, the caret is the standard way of representing exponentiation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. 65,536 ways is much more manageable, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Hi Soj!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well ......I guess he's caught on to the "SpinSpinSpin," and if it worked
in the past and it's worked for Chimp ....then wthe hell! Go For It!

Can't say as I blame him...depends on what you believe. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. ding ding ding
we have a winner!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. LOL...and this is Our Leader...? give me a break
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Ehmm, 2 to the 16 is 65536. What are you talking about ?
>>
look it up! Two to the 16th is a pretty big number - 20,000,000,000,000,000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACPS65 Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sounds Like Bush's Fuzzy Math
Kerry won Iowa.

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. link?
Please provide a link for the claim, "they wanted him to oppose the IWR, and he totally dissed it."

When and where did he do this, I missed it, exactly how did he dis the IWR?

Thanks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC