Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I think the AWOL issue is a HUGE issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:42 PM
Original message
Why I think the AWOL issue is a HUGE issue


bush* went AWOL from the Texas National Guard during time of war....
bush* covered this up, refusing to release his military records, and because of his wealth and connections, was able to continue his life as though he was some kind of American patriot, rather than a 'deserter to the United States of America in time of war".....


------------------------------
TODAY, bush* has ordered up the National Guard during time of war, and he has 'drafted' them, against their contracts, and terms of duty...forcing them to REMAIN in the National Guard on 'stop' orders for years...they cannot leave and rejoin their families...many of those being blown to pieces everyday are National Guard...

many of OUR drafted National Guard have suffered horribly...they had to leave their jobs to serve, making much much lower wages... without jobs to return to, their homes repoed, their wives divorce them...they are not well-trained like active duty and their equipment is second-rate cast-offs from the real military....how would like NOT to see your young child or newborn for MORE THAN A YEAR?

those who have left or refused to return to bush*s unjust war, have been dealt with severely by bush*, which is sickeningly hypocritical and calloused....

many will view the bush* desertion in the context of their own National Guard service TODAY, which bush* is commanding and cooked up as his very own failed policy....the horror that shrub has brutally imposed on TODAY's National Guard is coming back to haunt him...a blast-from-the-past whose time has come, to seek justice from a "deserter to the United States of America in time of war"... and IMO, bush* deserves it and we have an obligation to 'bring 'em on"...the time has come...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention that he is invoking
stop loss provisions to keep people from ending their normal periods of enlistment to feed his war machine. It was fine for him to skip out without finishing his obligation but today's soldier is help captive in active duty against their will!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. And if John Kerry or Wes Clark are the nomminees then we....
can make an issue out of it. If Dean is then forget it. He said that he did not want to go to war, got a deferment, and then went skiing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Kerry has already said he won't nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Medical deferments are completely legal. Desertion is a crime.
So there's absolutely no reason why Dean couldn't mention it. Junior "volunteered" for National Guard duty, and then he walked away for over a year. Even Mush Limpdick with his ass pimple deferment would have every reason to call Junior out on this crime (not that he would, of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for posting this
there are many newbie naysayers that are poo-pooing this issue. Thanks for posting an opposing view!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush Never Had to Work a Day In His Life
I'd call that a sissy.

I don't vote for sissies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Right on.
Guard deployments are very "of the moment" and on topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes and the only one who can't mention it is Dean
Because he got a back excuse and then went off to ski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shanty Oilish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good luck nailing the C in C on military attendance
That slate was washed white long ago. Probably in 41's day. Otherwise it would have been headlines 3 years ago.
IMO it's an issue that can only backfire on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. three years ago, bush* wasn't trying to win TWO wars on the backs
of the National Guard...the same military units that he deserted in time of war.....

three years ago, National Guard guys were just week-end warriers having boy scout fun in woods, using cast off military stuff....just the guys getting together for a little fun....BIG heros in their communities when floods, heavy snows, and other natural events occurred....it was a great way to add a little money to the household income....


TODAY, bush* decided to 'draft' the National Guard to shoulder the burden of his first TWO wars....we didn't have any National Guard left in Virginia during our last hurricane and heavy rains...

it is bush* who has put this HEAVY BURDEN directly on the National Guard, due to his very own failed policies and planning....TODAY, thousands of OUR National Guard have been permanently injured, arms, legs, eyes, hearing totally destroyed....hundreds more are DEAD....

this is all bush*'s fault...and that is the context TODAY, in which bush* must answer for his own failures to serve, and his desertion from the United States military in time of war....it bodes ill for the deserter...it was so much easier to blow it off three years ago, when National Guard was pretty low profile stuff...but today, it will NOT be easy to blow off his desertion from the NG....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it's not a huge issue now, it better start becoming one.
I was talking to a fellow political observer this evening at the karate school, and she says it's a big deal with all her friends (many of whom happen to be big Clark supporters). We NEED to bring this up again and again and again. He has NEVER fully answered or explained it. And he may well have to face one of two guys who actually went out and bled on a battlefield while his pansy-ass was hiding out on champagne-and-powder-puffs duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Another interesting discussion and related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Every issue is huge. We can't let any chance go by.
This is why Kerry's reluctance to nail Bush today is so disheartening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metrix Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Calling Bush on this is better left to others
Kerry deftly deflected the trap Novak set for him with the question and said instead that after his generation got back from Viet Nam they avoided making an issue of the choices made by others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. so now no one can make an issue of it
ya might as well skip over the issue...because the media won't cover it on their own, which means the American people won't know about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metrix Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Somebody like Bob Kerrey can get air time and talk about it endlessly
That is an example of what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC